It's so obvious, now — you splash hot sauce on chicken; you pour honey. But it never occurred to me to combine the two. That's why some men run growing $40 million companies — Mike's Hot Honey is on the menu in 3,000 restaurants and sold in 30,000 retail establishments nationwide — and some are wage slaves jammed onto the No. 36 bus going up State Street, excited at the prospect of free pizza.
If I asked you, what about that paragraph would prompt you to write in, aggrieved, I bet you would be hard-pressed to find the flaw to criticize. No so Chris S., who wrote:
Noticed in your writing you like to boast about yourself whether it’s how you used to get included at Gene & Georgetti’s political luncheon and now free pizza for this.
You should try some manual labor (ya know a real job where you actually produce something) and not just a bunch of hot air about a bunch of smorgasbord bullshit funded by a non for profit organization backed by JB Pritzker.
You’re one of the great hack writers of your era with little to no insight in Chicago newspapers. You’re legacy amounts to an article your colleagues will write that will be forgotten in tomorrows paper when the new headlines roll out.
Usually I'd shrug that kind of thing off without reply. But I felt extra generous. He was obviously a reader — the Gene & Georgetti reference was from a column on Jay Doherty that ran three months ago. Plus he was criticizing me over something for which I am actually proud. It was so vituperative, plus grammatically spotty ("you're legacy," "tomorrows paper") that getting angry didn't seem an option — he was mad enough for the both of us. So I read his remarks again, thought carefully, and replied this way:
Chris:No argument here. Thanks for writing.
NS
lol no problem. I’m just jealous
I did pause at the lol — "laughing out loud." Right wing haters are always laughing — trying to show their indifference and superiority, in a kind of "look at them Siegfrid, they're just ants" fashion. Anything that confuses them is deemed funny. It's a cover. I could have left it there, but I was on a roll, and replied to his reply:
No worries. I have a great life. A little jealousy is understandable.
Not something I ever actually come out and say much. But true, nevertheless.
I’m with you.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure what makes you think the LOL is a rightwing hater tell. I've noticed over the years that when you feel slighted or someone criticizes you, you assume they are trumpers, white supremacists , anti semitic or the Christian Right. There are plenty of liberal progressives that disagree with one another over a variety of issues as this comment section indicates.
ReplyDeleteI think you are an excellent columnist and blogger. You have a couple fine books and as far as a legacy raised two sons who seem to have turned out to be fine men. As for manual labor, its over rated. Writing, I'm sure is hard work and the pay aint that great.
Though I'm jealous too.
"Hurt people hurt people, but they coo at a touch."
ReplyDeleteUncommon wisdom. Poetry. Your column is a treasure.
A kind word turns away wrath. Thanks for the reminder.
ReplyDeleteI’m stuck at home due to a disability that makes it hard to get around. When I get out I feel surprised over and over at how nice people generally are. It think it’s because I’m alone and online all day, stuck in a world of assholes.
ReplyDeleteMy experience with thanking someone who has just insulted me is that they don’t thank me; they just get all fermisht and then get angry because, well, they got fermisht. Hmmmm. Must think about these things—or not.
ReplyDeleteIt's amazing how often I can resolve an argument by saying "I'm sure you're right." It doesn't mean I believe it, but it ends the fuss.
ReplyDeleteI marvel, seriously marvel, at your ability to remain so calm and rational in the face of such mean-spirited comments you sometimes receive. I'm passionate about people being able to express widely diverse beliefs and ideas, but I don't understand the scathing personal, demeaning attacks that are contained within some of those expressions. I'm sure you must have an explanation? And the "Hurt people hurt people" isn't an adequate one.
ReplyDeleteHow can anyone explain why some people are just jerks?
DeleteActually, why should they even try?
Okay... I'm with you fellas. (Delmar O'Donnell)
ReplyDeleteSnark deserves more and better snark. Could have counter-snarked with: "Manual labor? Wasn't he the president of Mexico?" Except that you can't use that old joke anymore. Witticisms of that sort are considered racist and bigoted and politically incorrect. Tough noogies. I like them anyway. And I use them.
ReplyDeleteMaybe that's why I get so many warnings and suspensions and disabled accounts and lifetime bans, and have a long rap sheet at Farcebook, as a repeat offender in their notorious jail. But here, I'm good. Mr. S doesn't put up with that shit. It doesn't see the light of day at EGD. Which is yet another reason why I love it so.
Grizz I believe the president of Mexico was : E. manual Labor
DeleteEduardo Manuel Labor? I stand corrected.
DeleteYou saw the high road and took it. Good for you. You both get a laugh. The world could use a little more.
ReplyDeleteThe lol reference reminded me of when I first started fumbling my way through email communications. I sent my two daughters a message and signed off with "lol, Dad," thinking it meant "lots of love." When corrected, I felt most uncool.
ReplyDeleteHow did you deduce that this guy was a “right wing hater”? Has he sent you other emails that suggest as much? All I’m seeing here is a guy that’s jealous of people that get free pizza
ReplyDeleteYou seem very wise Neil.
ReplyDeleteI can't let that pass unchallenged. I subscribe to T.S. Eliot's maxim that the only wisdom we can hope to achieve is the wisdom of humility. I often fail at that, of course. But that is the goal.
DeleteLOL is kind of like the "bless his heart" that some people use after reciting a litany of that person's perceived sins and character flaws.
ReplyDelete