For the offended

What is this?

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Talk about anxiety

 

"The Scream," by Edvard Munch

     Anxiety. The fight-or-flight instinct hardwired into our brains by 100,000 years of evolution gets short-circuited by our complex modern world. You can't stay and can't go, but sit frozen, scoured by whatever the hell is the matter. Or you flee and are chased by it. You both sit and run, mentally, as the problem harries you in a circle, from pillar to post. The car alarm shrieks and shrieks and you can't shut it off and you can't ignore it so you try to do both at the same time and do neither. You are torn apart.
     The fallout from the recent presidential debate disaster is a textbook example of anxiety disorder. After the first two minutes of the debate, when President Joe Biden's face appeared on the screen, vacant, stricken, his mouth an open rictus, his eyes gazing down and to the right, as if crushed in shame, the damage was done. Self-immolation, defeat. At that point, he could have grabbed a straw hat and bamboo cane tossed to him from off camera and started refuting Trump in a Gilbert & Sullivan patter song while tap dancing rings around him, and it would not have mattered.  He was cooked, finished. The shock rippled across the world.
     The immediate thought among t
hose who would protect the United States from four more years being molested by Donald Trump and his gang of revanchist stooges was: Biden must go. We can't run that man on the screen, gaping in senile infirmity while Trump rages and lies. If we do, the American voters will take the critical judgment they can't direct at Trump and use it to dismiss Biden. Fair? No. But stop the presses. Life ain't fair and politics is double unfair. Ask Howard Dean. 
      So the Democrats need a more dynamic candidate, like Hillary Clinton ... whoops, she lost. Like Gavin Newsom then ... but isn't he a Californian?  Or Pete Buttigieg (gay). Or Gretchen Whitmer (a woman, like Hillary). Kamala Harris then (a woman, Black and the vice-president). How many Trump voters will these candidates lure over to the light?
      Not enough, perhaps. Pollsters suggest all those options might do worse than Biden. At least now, though that could change. Unless it doesn't change. Unless Biden is the best we've got. The best hope for America.
     "He must go" quickly morphed into "He must stay." First, because Biden isn't about to go. He's the president. He powered himself to his plum job and he isn't about to step aside just because he can't arrange his features in a look of intelligence for five minutes when his job depends on it. A fairly low bar. So we stay with Biden. Yay! We're ridin' with Biden!
     Although the events he staged trying to wipe away memory of the event he just royally botched also fell flat. Crap yourself on live TV, and there isn't much interest in how precisely you clean up. And even the clean-up was messy. When George Stephanopoulos asked him on ABC how he'll feel if Nov. 5 comes and Trump crushes him, Biden said that so long as he tried his best, then that will be okay. Oh my God. That's worse than any gaffe. Not what you want your would-be hero to say. "Well George, in the end, it doesn't matter if I get that baby out of the burning building or not. What matters is I tried..." Actually it does matter. To the mom anyway. A lot. We don't care if Joe Biden feels good about himself. We want the baby not to burn.
     "Let's all try our best so we'll take our loss philosophically" is not a banner Dems will flock to. That's the white flag of defeat. As is denouncing those still pointing at the debate performance saying, "You know, that's really worrisome..."  Issuing demands for loyalty, to ignore the evidence of your eyes and shrug off unfitness — don't we already have one candidate doing that aplenty?
     Does all of this mean Trump wins? That providence, which has rolled a red carpet in front of Donald Trump literally since the day he was born, is ushering him back to the White House? Like all good nightmares, we thrash against our fate, but we're being tumbled in a torrent, over the falls. Trump was ahead in the polls before the debate. A relative phoned me to ask why, why, why the media is harping on Biden's decrepitude and not Trump's latest misdeeds, which seem to include showing up all over a truckload of newly released Jeffrey Epstein material. The man is literally accused of raping children. I remember a time when that would matter in presidential politics.
     Why why why? my relative cried.
     Do you want me to answer the question? I kept saying.
     "Why?" he wondered, never letting me speak. "Why?"
     Had he allowed me to respond, I would have said that Biden revealing himself to be as out-of-it as Republicans claim is now news, to the Democrats anyway, while Trump being a liar and a rapist and a fraud and a traitor, well, we've been showered with that daily for nearly a decade. Focusing on any particular Trump fib or fantasy has a so-what-else-is-new, and-Napoleon-escaped-from-Elba quality at this point.
     What to do? Anyone lashed by anxiety knows that the only thing to do is let it happen. Lean into your intrusive thoughts. Close your eyes and power forward, head down, legs churning. "If you find yourself going through hell," Winston Churchill said, "keep going."
     I wish I could say if only Biden would resign, then our problems would end. They wouldn't. We'd immediately be flung into a spiked pit of a new set of problems. The moment a candidate is identified the targeting systems lock in and blast away. Kamala Harris has been failing to meet expectations for four years. The process of selecting someone else would be messy and time consuming while Trump offers himself as the golden calf/savior he is already considered to be by 43 percent of the country. There seems to be no solution because there is no solution. November is coming and the only hope is that so many people cast a ballot for Not Trump that we move from the election phase to the beating back whatever Second Insurrection Trump has got planned phase. Talk about anxiety. 

30 comments:

  1. We’ve been through many dire situations as a nation and are still here. I agree with Winston.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we are still here, but we are diminished. And we must do as Winston said, completely agree.

      Delete
  2. The easiest path would be for Biden to step down from the presidency and then President Harris takes over his delegates and campaign funds before the convention. Why do people consider her so toxic?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe has to resign, or else Harris does not get either the delegates or the moolah. If he merely steps aside and drops out of the race, and merely endorses her as the best candidate to replace him, all that is up for grabs.

      The Democratic convention becomes an open convention. Whoever is nominated in Chicago in August then has to not only have to get on the ballot in every state, all over again, but raise the billion dollars that Joe accumulated in his campaign chest. over the course of four years. All in a matter of days, because there are legal deadlines.

      Worse still, everybody who did not get what they wanted, whether that be Joe or Harris or somebody else, is going to be pissed off at the result. And a pissed-off and fractured party, at war with itself, is burnt toast unless it somehow unites before going into battle. The last time all this happened, after RFK bought it in '68, we got the Veep--Hubert Humphrey--and blood in the streets, and...inevitably...Nixon. Oh, they came together eventually, after Chicago, but it was too little...and much too late.

      When I read all this, in a re-post on Facebook, it blew me away. And it made me completely realize, now more than ever, that like it or not, we gotta leave the dance with the one who brought us...Handsome Joe. There's really no choice. The sand has almost run out of the hourglass. We're like Dorothy in the Witch's castle.

      I'm not pulling this out of my posterior orifice, either. Somebody who knows a helluva lot more than i do just wrote about all this, and explained it all in detail. Someone in the higher echelons of the party.

      She laid it all out on the table, point by point, three days after the debate, and somebody re-posted all of it on Facebook, and I have been looking for it for a whole f'king week now, so that I can read it again, and understand it better, and most importantly of all, keep on re-posting it so that people understand that it's gotta be Joe. Or else Mr. Tangerine Man wins by default. And then we're seriously f'ked. No, make that totally f'ked.

      So if anybody else happened to see and read what I'm talking about, then throw me a name. Last name I tried was Janet Sanders. No dice. Help me out here, if you can. Somebody? Anybody?

      Delete
    2. actually, in the vast majority of states, there is a slot reserved for the nominee of the democratic and republic parties. it is the fringe parties and candidates thatt have to jump through hoops. i spent a lifetime in pollitics and unions (and mor politics). ballot access is NOT the biggest problem.

      Delete
    3. I don't know why others consider her toxic, but it's her mixed record and hypocrisy on criminal justice issues while she was the attorney general of California, specifically prisoners who were going to be let go early during the pandemic continue to be held through action of her office because they were required in the firefighting efforts to control the wildfires in that state
      I just think that if someone is scheduled to be released from prison they should be released and not held because they're free or low paid labor is essential to the workings of the government.
      Still I would vote for her if she were the option.

      Delete
    4. It's not staunch Democratic voters such as myself and many others on this blog comment section that is going to win the election. It's independent and swing voters who I don't believe will be energized by her candidacy anymore than they are by biden's and they're just going to sit on the sidelines overall, making it a closer race than it should be. If Biden could get the turnout he got in 2020 he'd be golden. But now that people really know him, I don't think that they'll come out in those numbers

      Delete
    5. Paul O, If Biden drops out, he cannot just give his campaign chest to Harris. PAC money to the Democratic Party would be available, but she would have to raise funds herself, and fast.

      Delete
    6. Update, Forbes claims Harris could use the funds, being part of the campaign, but any other candidate could not. But in that case, Biden would have to close out his organization, pay all bills, then donate to a PAC.

      Delete
  3. what do you suggest we DO to affect this change that is required to increase our chances of holding the White House . I haven't seen anyone in the streets or on campuses and retirement communities protesting bidens candidacy. he will be nominated prior to the actual convention , virtually like everything else in our lives. so commenting on social media is our only option?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ever since I turned off the debate halfway through, I've been cringing inside a kind of shell, avoiding all forms of political news while knowing that eventually I will have to come out. This column was, for me, a much-needed first peek into the light outside the shell. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am as unenthusiastic as anyone about Kamala Harris, but I do think occasionally about Lyndon Johnson, who was treated as a joke as VP (“Can Lyndon come out and play?” said the First Family satire) but who turned into a very strong President, both for good and bad, when he was handed the job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People were horrified when "that Texan" took over after Kennedy was killed, but within less than a year he won 44 states and got 61.1% of the popular vote, the second-highest total ever up to that time (only FDR, in 1936, had done better).

      But Vietnam did him in, and so he bowed out, and we found ourselves in the same kind of mess we're in now. Actually, we're in a far worse mess. I'd take Nixon in a heartbeat.

      Nobody was really thrilled about the V-P (Humphrey) becoming the favorite, but Kamala Harris is no Hubert Humphrey. Truth be told, RFK would have won in Chicago, and probably in November, but I'll stop right there. No use beating a dead...horse.

      Delete
    2. Johnson didn't bow out because he was going to lose. It was probably due to declining health, but he would have beaten Nixon and saved us from that hell. And his resignation did nothing to stop the war. For the country, he made the wrong choice. I hope Biden is wiser.

      Delete
  6. You never vote for just a president. You vote for their party, their vision, their backing, and their abilities.

    There is no doubt President Biden is old. There is no doubt he has slowed. There is no doubt that he shuffles, or says the wrong thing at times, or looks tired, or stumbles, or...

    There is also no doubt that President Biden's record and achievements are impressive. He has done much of what he said he wanted to do. Republican's have prevented him from doing a lot of other stuff.

    This chaos, to me at least, is proof of two things.

    1: American's need to be a much more informed people. We need to read more reporting, find more fact based news, and understand the wider picture not our infinitesimally small selves and incessant need to "famous."

    2: American's are losing the war against disinformation, fake news, and propaganda. Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine and since then we've slowly slid into a world where reporting is telling a story and not reporting on the facts. Capitalism is anti truth and pro clicks (money). It is failing us and lying to us.

    I'm a blue dog democrat. And i get gruff for saying i will never vote for a republican. Given what i read and see and hear I see no world where any American could vote for a republican.

    Compare democrats and republicans. Compare what they say, how they vote, who and what they support, and a very clear picture is formed.

    There really isn't a choice.

    Dead or alive. staring aghast into the camera or defecating himself on live tv. in a coma or dark Brandon. Joe Biden and the democrats get my vote. But so does mayor Pete, or Vice President Harris, or Hillary Clinton, or Gavin Newsom, Or JB Pritzker. Because they believe in America. They believe in American people. they believe in democracy, taxation, public health.

    Be more French, the Atlantic said. While the article was flawed, it does say what needs to be said; find the center left and vote for everyone left of it. from the top of the ballot to the bottom. Don't let a group of elephants take the blue out of our country and replace it with black.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never cast a vote for a republican presidential candidate, but I am on the fence about '92.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. I agree except "never" vote for a Republican. There have been and will continue to be excellent Republican politicians. Since our system divvies up everybody into 2 labels I think we all need to be open to choosing the candidate we like best....regardless of party label.

      Delete
    2. I almost voted for Ford? Why? Because I liked him. (M-O-U-S-E).
      He seemed to be a decent and honest man. Just a Republican, that's all.
      But I didn't, because he pardoned Nixon. I was young in '76, and foolish.

      Delete
    3. @Brunan. I understand your sentiment. Though if the last 30 years has taught me anything, it is that no matter what a republican candidate says, their voting record and actions speak the truth. You can count on one hand the republicans who voted to convict Donald Trump; in fact i think you can vote on a single finger. Despite all their hooting and holloring about Obama or Clinton's actions while in office. They are frauds and their actions are the proof. I would love to see some arguments (with actual factual proof) to refute my position, but i have been unable to find any.

      Let's also not forget how republicans officials vote, en mass. no questions. one or two are allowed to "descent" when the numbers do not matter. And what do they do when they announce they are leaving their post? The bemoan the state of the party, the leadership, the people. "its not right." "MAGA is bad." "this isn't the party i joined." and yet, while they were in office they said nothing, they did nothing, they rubber stamped the republican agenda and never did anything when it actually mattered.

      Lastly, republicans don't vote in the best interest of their constituents. Good policy or public funding that goes to the people of their states and districts is voted down without abandon. Then they turn around and praise the jobs it created, the bridges it fixed, the good it does in the community. They are frauds.

      There is no longer a "good" republican. that is a myth. Until they prove otherwise, they don't deserve to serve our country or its people.

      Delete
  8. WOW that Churchill quote is a killer--I had totally forgotten it, but then, unlike Neil, I don't have the full set of Churchill's works lined up in the office to page through of an evening.

    I'll push back on the idea that there's no solution though. Let's go with that other quote--is it Voltaire? Not sure but here goes: To paraphrase, let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Or goodest. Of course there's a solution. It just isn't a the big comfy blanket some Democrats would like to hold and suck their thumbs with. It's a democratic process that would be work. So get to work, people.

    A blitz primary to let the delegates choose a replacement at the convention would be a whirlwind, but why is it that being painted as a bad thing? That's democracy, baby--or don't the Democrats want a democratic process? The party and Biden campaign made sure the primary wasn't, and look where that got them. Dean Phillips is looking pretty good right about now, but Biden managed to keep him off the ballot in many places and keep most media from ever interviewing him. Choosing a new candidate now would draw publicity you can't buy, and totally energize the general election campaign afterward--which is plenty of time.

    But if they anoint Kamala Harris without making her earn it in the fair open primary they denied voters this past year, that's the surest way to waste everybody's time and probably lose to Trump again. Her numbers are worse than Biden's, she was a lousy campaigner in the 2020 primaries, and she has only proven she can win in California, a deep blue state. She and Gavin Newsome are both unlikely to be winners. They need somebody who can win the undecideds in purple swing states. And let anybody tell you it's racist or sexist to make Kamala run against some others. Every single VP who has *ever* run for president has had challengers--even some presidents. Ask Harry Truman.

    Biden's replacement may lose. But Biden WILL lose. I know if *I* were in a burning building, I would jump out the window and break a leg rather than get burned alive. But that's just me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Our current VP would I think make a very capable President;but I find her speech patterns come across as whiny, ironic w Mr T being the biggest baby ever in the White House.....she'd still get my vote in a heart beat... nevertheless...I have several progressive firends who feel the same..perhaps petty but not certain she's electable..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Petty? I'm guessing you meant pretty. I feel the same way.

      Delete
  10. "Kamala Harris has been failing to meet expectations for four years." i really don't know how you can say that about her, or for that matter, most any veep. there only job is to support the president and not step on their (in this case metaphorical) dick when given an assignment, which she has done on both counts. there's really no reason to freak out if she ends up being the replacement.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We cannot predict the future, but we must continue forward as you write. I think you’ve captured the situation succinctly.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If I understood you correctly, you're suggesting that folk in the media operate on the assumption that there's no reason to mention the fact that Trump continues to lie over and over again. Why? Because it isn't "newsworthy." Some of us might think it was in fact newsworthy for Trump to say everyone wanted Roe v. Wade overturned, Such a statement is so far detached from "the truth" that some might wonder if Trump might now be delusional, but the media didn't consider it worth mentioning. And blaming Nancy Pelosi for not calling on the National Guard to protect the Capitol on January 6th? Just another "little lie"! Maybe it's time for folk in the media to look at themselves and ask why they've learned nothing about how to cope with Trump in the course of the last nine years.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am late to this conversation. I just finished watching Biden's lengthy news conference, following the NATO summit.
    I have been a reliable (but not guaranteed) Democratic vote since I earned the right to vote. The first schism with my parents I can recall involved my support of a Democratic candidate. My father went ballistic. He told me I could AFFORD to vote Democrat because i was doing so on HIS Republican dollar! (our conflict persisted for many election cycles until my father finally conceded that "trickle-down economics" did not work, and he finally joined me, rather than canceling out my vote).
    Yet I am someone who is insulted by the option of a straight-party ticket. I do not vote on the basis of party. I vote for the best candidate. (hint-hint... Rob Blagojevich did NOT deserve my vote!).
    so here we are.... Anything miraculous in Joe Biden's performance tonight merely forestalls the inevitable. The majority of Dems want a line-up change.
    My first response was an instinctive sense of protection.... stop the divisiveness! NOW is the time for party unity!
    That time seems to have passed. Joe Biden is a damaged party candidate.
    My reaction tonight (and hence the anonymity) is a bit radical..... we NEED TO DEFEAT Donald Trump. That is our immediate goal. I would support a moderate Republican at this point, over a damaged Democrat or a Far-Right Republican. It may be our only option. I would gladly vote for a moderate Republican for the next 4 years vs Donald Trump. Larry Hogan, Mike DeWine...whatever it takes. The Democrats have been wooing Republicans for the past 2 yrs. Now the tide has turned. To stop DJT, the country needs to embrace a moderate Republican. Let Trump be held accountable for his actions. Deal with it for 4 years, and present a different Democratic slate in 2028.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Interesting article about RFK and if he could have won the election. Basically no way of knowing. It would have been tough just winning the nomination. Even if he had won the nomination he would have had to gotten some votes fro voted for Wallace. Even if he won the popular vote he still would have lost the electoral college. Even if won the states Wallace won. Wallace got 46 votes. Nixon had 301, Humphry had 191. He would have been in the same boat if he had won the popular vote. It is hard to believe that in 4 years things could have changed so much. Nixon won the vote in California. How ever if Humphrey got Wallace's votes he would have won. There were a couple of states like that. Kennedy probably wouldn't have taken the southern states as Goldwater won them in 64. He did not win Florida. Florida had only 14 electeral college votes then. Johnson won Florida in 64 but Nixon won it in 68 Same with California, Illinois and a lot of other states. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/06/05/rfk-bobby-kennedy-myth-legend-history-218593/

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am sure many of the readers of this blog also read Heather Cox Richardson's work. In case they do not, I recommend her July 9, 2024 piece.

    https://substack.com/home/post/p-146456398?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.