For the offended

What is this?

Monday, February 24, 2025

The New Yorker marks 100 years of excellence



     Chicago owes a lot to New York. We don't like to admit it, but it's true. This place was pretty much started by New York land speculators. Our first mayor, William B. Ogden, was a New York lawyer sent to check on his brother's real estate holdings. He stuck around and put his bets on the new railroad, while St. Louis was doubling down on riverboats.
     We still use nicknames that New Yorkers gave us, like "Windy City," describing, not the winter gales, but our blasts of ballyhoo trying to snag the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition.
     And "Second City" — the title of a three-part backhand A. J. Liebling published in The New Yorker in 1952, a gleeful vivisection of Chicago as a dreary cultural backwater, with bad plays, lousy water and erratic garbage service. Not a proper metropolis at all, but "a theater backdrop with a city painted on it." The Loop "like Times Square and Radio City set down in the middle of a vast Canarsie."
     Chicago rolled with the criticisms. One of the many ambitious improv comedy groups that sprouted here in the 1950s took "Second City" as its proud moniker, the way gays coopted the insult "queer." And to far less renown I took an angry line scribbled on a postcard to Liebling, "You were never in Chicago," and used it as the title of my city memoir a dozen years ago.
     The New Yorker celebrates its 100th anniversary this month, and while it is off-brand for a Chicago metro columnist to note the occasion, who cares? We defy parochialism. Credit where due. What started as an arch romp for Manhattan sophisticates turned into an engine driving liberal American culture, from John Hersey's "Hiroshima" — the whole Oct. 31, 1946 issue given over to a sympathetic portrayal of a people who, months before, were being displayed solely as loathsome buck-toothed caricatures. To Ronan Farrow helping spark the Me Too movement with his 2017 expose on Harvey Weinstein.
     Too many to cite. Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" comes to mind. Busloads of masterful writers: Joseph Mitchell. J.D. Salinger. Humorists from Robert Benchley and Woody Allen to Ian Frazier and Simon Rich. Before he was on the radio, Garrison Keillor wrote for The New Yorker. Genius artists — from Saul Steinberg, no relation, alas, to Charles Addams, Bruce McCall and Roz Chast.
     The New Yorker certainly was a polestar for me — I've lived in a house that subscribed to the magazine for my entire life. My father, a proud product of the Bronx, subscribed. As a teen, I wanted to be James Thurber, and modeled myself on him so much that as college ended I didn't bother applying for a job. Somebody would introduce me to my E.B. White and I'd be on my way. As a career strategy, that worked about as well as you'd expect.
     Writing my first book, a history of college pranks, the question arose whether to write the chapter on Caltech's Ditch Day using the mass of information already written about it, or spend a chunk of my advance getting to Pasadena for the day of pranks. "What would John McPhee do?" I asked myself, then booked a flight.
     At least that got published. Battering myself against the barred door of The New Yorker was the same futile effort for me that it was for most writers who miss the mark. Except for one short story, "Mascots Reign at Fall Show," a parody of the trade shows I covered at McCormick Place. The British quarterly Granta accepted, then rejected it. Which emboldened me to dare send it to The New Yorker.
     An editor, Dan Menaker called me at home. I remember where I was standing when I got the call. The story, he said, is terrific — it reminded him of Donald Barthelme. I hung up the phone and let out a scream. We worked together on it for a few weeks. But in the end Tina Brown didn't like it. I kept sending in new work, not realizing I'd already had my Moonlight Graham moment. The rest of the submissions got increasingly formal rejections. But that one story, for one moment. "It was like coming this close to your dreams, then having them brush past you, like a stranger in a crowd," Burt Lancaster says in 'Field of Dreams." "I thought 'They'll be other days' I didn't realize, that was the only day."

To continue reading, click here.

24 comments:

  1. I used to think that "Second City" was referring to Chicago being behind New York in some way, then a guide on an architecture tour said it was actually referring to the the city being rebuilt after the fire and I liked that interpretation much better. Looking it up now, it seem both explanations are sort of correct, but the fire restoration one is older, so I'm going to stick to that one. Screw those NYC snobs, they can't even get their garbage organized and have to dump it on the street. :)
    https://theskydeck.com/chicago-facts/why-is-chicago-called-the-second-city/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have a more impressive and beautiful lake view-New York is hemmed in with tall buildings and little chance to see the rivers or sky. And we hide our garbage!

      Delete
    2. We have a beautiful big lake-NY has a couple of rivers

      Delete
    3. And a couple of rivers too, I should have mentioned.

      Delete
  2. And don’t forget RogerAngell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or John Cheever, Philip Roth, John Updike, and Irwin Shaw...

      Delete
    2. I could have gone on and on, and probably should have. "The Girls in Their Summer Dresses" is one of my favorite short stories.

      Delete
    3. I'm re-reading "The Young Lions again. First read it in high school. My all-time favorite WWII novel. Own a first-edition hard cover copy from 1948, and a first-edition paperback copy from 1958, when the movie with Brando and Dean Martin and Montgomery Clift was released.

      My aunt and mother confused it with the Disney documentary..."The African Lion"...and dumped me and my sister and my cousins at the Terminal theater on Lawrence Ave. for a Saturday matinee. Was about to turn eleven. That was the day I learned about the Holocaust.

      "The Girls in Their Summer Dresses" appeared in the New Yorker in the late Thirties, before it became the country's foremost magazine for serious short fiction. Shaw's early work helped change the magazine's direction.

      Love your shelf of New Yorker books, Mr. S. Only have a few. The 75th anniversary cartoon anthology, and a book of cat cartoons, and the volume of WWII pieces, and the New Yorker War Album, a rare 1942 collection of war-themed cartoons. Funny stuff, in a tragic time. Just what educated liberals enjoy.

      Delete
    4. I was also going to mention Roger Angell. I have no idea how I got turned on to him. It was well after 1962 when he wrote his first baseball article. I went back and read all of them. One of the best things I read was his story about Frank Viola and Ron Darling who pitched against each other in a college game in 1981. Both went on to have pretty good careers.

      Delete
  3. One of my favorite memories of being a kid in the 1950s was sneaking into the adult section of the local public library and gorging on New Yorker cartoon books. Part, maybe, of what led me to become a (now retired) public Librarian.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cheers to The New Yorker, and to its part in your own life-and-career journey. Love the "Eh. You know how it is." exchange. Something to ponder as we all reflect on our wishes and stations in life.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I spotted Joseph Mitchell's books in your photo. One of the best. Congratulations on getting two cartoon captions in. Harder than it looks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Writer Calvin Trillin, who spent some time at The New Yorker, says it took him a while to realize that they purposely printed some cartoons that were not at all funny so that readers would decide the magazine was even more sophisticated than they'd realized.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it’s my age (old) but I don’t think some of the cartoons these days are funny and some I don’t get at all.

      Delete
  7. Moonlight Graham Moment. That’s all I needed to know what you meant.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, Liebling and many other coastal types have disparaged Chicago as essentially just being a particular feature of flyover country. And, of course, there's the famous Saul Steinberg "View of the World from 9th Avenue" cover of The New Yorker showing the rest of the country past the Hudson River occupying less space than the western edge of Manhattan.

    But recently I was watching an interview with Fran Lebowitz on YouTube. As a famously sardonic New York resident, she's not one to offer unwarranted praise, to say the least. And for years, she's traveled all over giving speeches and answering folks' questions, so it's not like her opinion about cities is uninformed. She said something to the effect that there are only 2 real cities in the United States -- New York (obviously) and Chicago. I thought that was a swell observation, regardless of its accuracy.

    Fortunately, without realizing that this anniversary was coming up, we re-subscribed to The New Yorker in December. It's a great magazine, but it's pretty hard for us to keep up with the volume. Once a few dozen issues pile up unread, we have to let it lapse, or we'd be overrun! Obviously, that's an embarrassing admission, but "you know how it is." ; )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i saw the same interview a while ago. she's got it right and i laughed at this exchange right after she said that about chicago: "interviewer: 'what about san francisco?' Liberman:'[basically throwing it away] 'it's a village, chicago's a city' "
      the whole interview is a hoot, btw. Look, i'm a lifelong (Just shy of 79 years) resident of chicago except for the army and college. i love the city, but i also love ny- go there 2 or 3 times a year. people from chicago do really need to get over this ny thing-both great places, but just different.

      Delete
  9. The father of a girl I dated in high school subscribed and got me hooked. As soon as I could afford to, I started subscribing... over 50 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Neil, the Windy City monicker has been examined many times over and was well known by 1876. In a rivalry with Cincinnati, the braggarts from Chicago were considered windbags and, thus, were labeled as such well before the New York reference in the 1890s. Some historians attribute the fact that Chicago won the battle to host the World's Fair over New York for galvanizing that reputation.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I forgot to mention how much I enjoyed reading about your dreams of writing for the New Yorker. Although it might sound fatalistic, I've always liked a once encountered phrase: "We will always manage to bring ourselves to the place we are meant to be." As you said, "You know how it is."

    ReplyDelete
  12. The closest I ever came to New Yorker glory was riding in an Algonquin Hotel elevator with E. B. White. I just stood shyly in the corner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. White was Roger Angel's step father. Angel's mother was also a writer for the New Yorker

      Delete
  13. Didn't start reading the New Yorker until 1968.Every issue was a treasure. Devoured the Talk of the Town pieces, the columns on jazz and baseball, the short stories by renowned writers, the long pieces interspersed by ads for Jaguar and Chanel...and for crystal paperweights with coral in their centers. "Oh, wow, definitely gonna buy one of those!" I told myself. Until I saw the prices...around six grand. Ouch.

    For a little while, I even thought I could be New Yorker staff material. A private office, classical music on the radio, and that crystal paperweight on my big oak desk. Can anybody be that green and ignorant at 21? Oh, yeah. Me.


    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.