For the offended

What is this?

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Assembling the IKEA cabinet of happiness

 


 
     So I went to the opening plenary at the Organization of American Historians at the Sheraton Thursday. It was a brisk walk across the Loop from Madison Street to North Water and Columbus Drive, and it put me in, shall we say, maximum high spirits, seeing the people, the buildings parallaxing by.
     I got there about 4:10 p.m., checked in for my press credentials.
    "I'm from the Chicago Sun-Times," I said. "Or what's left of it."
     Which is very on-brand for me — acknowledge the elephant in the room, say the unsaid thing, spill more of my business than is purely necessary. Shutting up, as I often also say, is an art form I struggle to master. Still.
     There was 20 minutes before I was supposed to meet a reader who is a member of the organization — her email lured me there — and there was a concourse filled with booths from book publishers. Why not plunge in?
     Here I did an unthinking thing. Regular readers know that in 2009 I took a trip out west with the boys, then 12 and 13. When it was over, I wrote a book about it, pieces of which pop up here from time to time, like dead fish floating to the surface of a poisoned pond. It was supposed to be a keepsake for them, but for that to happen someone would have to publish the thing. So I'd have something tangible to hand them someday. Otherwise its a bunch of electrons that could wink out of existence with a hard drive crash. And look, here were these publishers, all around me.
     So I blundered up to one after another who might in theory be interested. There was the University of Illinois Press, which I'd actually sent the manuscript to, years ago. They rejected it with a sniff of "Not an Illinois book," ("But it begins in Illinois!" I'd objected. "And ends there! And involves three Illinoisans on an adventure!" No dice).   
      To my credit, I did try to browse the spreads of new books — but honestly, while the covers were well-designed and they were all in English, the subjects didn't interest me. If I'd been encouraged to take whatever volumes I wanted home with me, I don't think I'd have snagged one.  The subjects were obscure, rococo and uninviting. 
     The only book I actually flipped through was "Food Autonomy in Chicago" by Pancho McFarland, published by the University of Georgia Press. Years ago I'd been to the The 70th Street Farm in East Englewood with Sarah Stegner, then chef at the Ritz, to check on her tomato plants, and somehow imagined that a book with that title might connect me to similar stories related to food autonomy. Stuff I could put in the paper.
     But honestly, I couldn't make sense of the table of contents — the words slid off the page. I didn't take notes on the chapters, and the media at the University of Georgia Press didn't respond to a request for the table of contents. But two paragraphs describing the book from the publisher might give a sense of the thing:

     This examination of a sector of the food autonomy movement in Chicago provides important new ways of understanding race relations, gender, sexuality, spirituality, pedagogy, identity, and their importance to the dynamics of social movements. Additionally, the book explores how revolutionary culture, principles, and organization of American Indigenous, diasporan Africans, anarchist Mexicans and others have been adopted, adapted, or rejected in our food movement.
     In this autoethnography of the food movement, McFarland argues that at our best we work to establish a new society like that theorized and enacted by Indigenous and Black anarchists. However, the forces of Wetiko (colonialism, capitalism, heteropatriarchy, and white supremacy) make the work of BIPOC food warriors difficult. Wetiko’s conceptual categories—including race, gender, sexuality, and citizenship—influence our worldviews and affect our behaviors.
     Are you beginning to see what a book on three guys getting lost in Yellowstone Park might not find an eager publisher? I am. 
     Though not on the spot. I presented myself to several editors at several publishers, whose reaction could be best described as a sort of numb disinterest. Being with the Sun-Times meant nothing. Being a published author meant nothing.  I meant nothing.
     What did I expect? Them to leap up and embrace me. "Comrade!" 
     Eventually it came time to go upstairs for the talk — I plan to write about that Wednesday. Afterward, still not grasping the situation, I returned to the publishers' concourse to resume raking my fingers against the brick wall. 
     "We're looking for books about Native-Americans," said an editor at the University of Oklahoma Press, when I finally paused for breath and could register the plea in her eyes, which said, in essence, "Please go away now."
      Suddenly I saw myself as if from afar. A gray-haired man, spewing nonsense. Really, had I been a bum, whoops, unhoused person, living on Lower Wacker Drive, and wandered up, with my layers of jackets and shiny pants and red ruined face and went from booth to booth, asking for a chaw of tobacco, I don't think my reception would have been much different. 
     Feeling quite eviscerated I collected what little remained of my pride the way a person who had actually been slashed across the abdomen by the razor of book publishing circa 2025 might collect his guts in both hands, and waddled out the door, trying not to step on his dragging entrails.
     I rode the train home, grim, and came home. grim, my mouth set, my wife's attempts to boost the mood water off a duck's ass. I grimly made myself  a plain dinner. Cashews. Cheese. A simple salad. Stuff that wouldn't boost my blood sugar. 
     Sometimes the only thing to do is go to bed and hope it makes sense in the morning. 
     And you know what? It did make sense in the morning. I blinked into the world, had one taste of stale grimness, a kind of mental drymouth, spat that out, and starting thinking, belatedly. 
     Looking back on the night before, I realized my mistake. Not right away. For maybe an hour I puzzled over it, like a guy trying to assemble an IKEA cabinet, holding a sheet of instructions in one hand and pawing through an unpromising mess of shiny metal screws and wooden dowels and plastic spacers in the other.
     But eventually an idea took shape, an that idea was this:
     It was my fault. 
     I should have parked my ego at the door. Shut up about the damned book already. I should have asked each publisher what their favorite new book was. Should have asked them about their visit to Chicago. Asked them anything. It's not all about me, obviously. I went in there hot, talking about myself, and should have resisted that and done my damn job. I had set myself up, dropped my guard. 
     How many times have I quoted that damn T.S. Eliot line about humility? It doesn't mean jack shit if you are not yourself humble. Which I'm not. But can be. With work. I've done. On occasion. It takes effort. You can sure as hell try. Harder than I thought to try Wednesday night.
     Not just try, as Yoda says. Do.  There is no try.
     But no shame there either. Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you — that isn't T.S. Eliot, but also true. Realizing that it was my fault was very liberating, oddly. The world is the world. Every loser and headcase has a grievance. Certainly a better takeaway than, "You're a loser who can't get his books published." Today is a new chance, a bright shiny span of hours to use as I please. Learn from yesterday's sorrow then fling it away.
     There is an expression in Norwegian, "Du er din egen lykkesmed," which Google Translate puts into English as "You are the master of your own luck." Though my Norwegian friend Gry says it scans to locals as, "You are your own source of happiness." It's too easy, when something makes you unhappy to let it sit in your craw, festering, to accept it on face value, blame others — "Wah, those publishers were indifferent to me!" — when you can also spit it out, rinse, learn something. You have X days to live, and then you wink out forever. How many days, how many hours, are you willing to lose to unhappiness based on things beyond your control? Are you going to be happy? Or not? Your call. Don't look for outside validation. Your own happiness is always within you, though often hiding. You need to flush it out.


40 comments:

  1. Ah, a moment of enlightenment. You are learning, grasshopper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No wonder so many books that are published today don't sell & end up at dollar stores with the covers ripped off!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hope we get to read that book someday, no doubt it is as enchanting as all the others. Keep trying!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, we will buy copies of whatever you write. Your work is always wry, often wise. Please keep at it!

      Delete
  4. Gosh, why don’t you self-publish? Lots of people do nowadays. I would certainly buy a few copies and so would many of your other readers/fans. That way you would also absolutely have two books for the boys plus a few extra for all future grandkids. Think about that! BMP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because self-published books always look like shit.

      Delete
    2. But you don't mean my books?

      Delete
    3. No worries, Mr. Clark. I’ve purchased, read, and enjoyed Nobody’s Angel, Dancing on Graves, and Hack Writing & other stories, with the last two being self-published. The self-published versions were as easy to read as Nobody’s Angel. Keep on writing and self-publishing. And, thanks to Mr. Steinberg for bringing your writing to my attention.

      Delete
    4. Thanks. That's good to hear. I just self published another private detective novel Nickel Dime Town. Checkout the cover if you get a chance. I think it's really cool.

      Delete
    5. C'mon Jack. I was speaking generally. You know how supportive I am of you.

      Delete
    6. And I was kidding. I appreciate your support. Thanks.

      Delete
  5. Thanks Neil. Sorta needed that today.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There’s always indie publishing. The freedom of publishing what you want to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you, well put!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'd like to hear more about the trip out west.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Plug "Quest for Pie" into the search bar and various vignettes I've posted over the years will come up. Like this: https://www.everygoddamnday.com/2018/01/be-strong-be-clean.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh those Norwegians!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Humans are wired to create narratives out of experience - ex post facto, after the fact. We create the story of our lives every day with this unavoidable mechanism. Those who are honest and talented and industrious work magic with the narratives they create. You sir, are the best of the best at this human imperative. A corollary to the wisdom you share today is this: Never punish yourself because someone else is an ass. Good on you for making something beautiful out the indifference of others.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Reading the manifesto for Pancho McFarland's book brought Michael Pollan's dictum to mind: "Never eat anything that has more than 5 ingredients."

    john

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's a wonderful book, worthy of publication. Someday, under unforseen circumstances, it will drop into a publishers lap, and finally see the light of day. It will be billed as "Neil Steinberg's lost travelogue!"

    ReplyDelete
  14. Over my lifetime I've had at least a dozen people tell me that they were writing a book, a novel to be particular I can't say that a single one of them ever got a single thing published but you've had more than one book published. I don't know if that happened because you directly approached people who publish books or if you have an agent and they somehow managed to go through the proper channels to get your manuscript onto the desk of people who make these kinds of decisions.
    You should shout from the rooftops with joy at your accomplishment

    ReplyDelete
  15. I wonder if most of those University Press books just get sold to other schools and become required reading for various Social Science courses. That’s fine but I doubt they would sell many copies on the open market.

    Those young people should have shown a little respect to someone who has had books published that people wanted to read on their own time. It’s good to self reflect and ask what you could have done differently. They may still have been dismissive but at least you can walk away knowing you tried.

    I probably would have picked up Food Autonomy in Chicago, it is a subject that interests me. Although my definition would be to have a freezer full of venison, fish caught from local waters, hens for eggs, Apple and Pear trees, and a garden. Then share and barter with neighbors who do the same. I know all of that is not feasible in the inner city but would be interested in other points of view on the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Snarking about university presses featuring scholarly books at an academic conference is an interesting choice in the current political climate. Your folksy bewilderment at academic language made me think of a recent NPR interview about anti-intellectualism. I don't think I can include a link here, but it's the top result if you search "intellectuals vs. the internet NPR." You're aligning with some real sinister creeps here. And your wan attempt at self-deprecation after nobody fawned over you is pretty cringe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So because fascism is rising, I need to kiss the ass of all academics such as yourself? Noted. And rejected. I'm not aligning myself with anybody, just expressing myself honestly. The academic demand for uniformity of thought helped get us into this pickle, not me wishing I could get another book published.

      Delete
    2. Not an academic, just a little ol' BA in English who thinks the assault on higher ed is dangerous and anti-democratic (small d). "The academic demand for uniformity of thought"? The same university press that published you is famous for bringing us Milton Friedman and F.A. Hayek!

      Delete
    3. There is certainly an assault on higher education, but me being puzzled over one book isn't part of it. Honestly, there's no need for me to engage with you. Your remarks are what I consider "self-refuting." If you don't like my peaches, don't shake my tree.

      Delete
    4. I'm actually kind of amazed that you respond to ANY comments from Anonymous. Tthe book blurb you quoted made me chuckle.

      Delete
    5. Yeah, I shouldn't have. But he was the only one to bitch, and it got under my skin.

      Delete
    6. don't worry ns, the weasel deserved it

      Delete
  17. After attending the rally yesterday, I thought you were referring to a topic many protestors addressed: that IKEA cabinets were smarter than Trump’s. I was mistaken. Good column nonetheless.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Well I learned a new word today: Wetiko. Now I have to figure out how to casually drop it in a conversation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A regular reader can learn so much at EGD. First time I have ever come across that word. Anywhere. Maybe it's more common that I know. Not a foodie, let alone a food warrior. Just a meat and-potatoes and tuna casserole kind of guy.

      And reading about "the dynamics of social movements" and "establishing new societies" feels like an exercise in futility at this moment in history, what with fascism on the march and all. So it's no surprise that I never knew about the scourge of Wetiko...until now.

      Wetiko. Sounds like the brand name for those interlocking plastic squares that are placed on the decks around outdoor swimming pools, to prevent slips and falls. But it's actually a word that Native Americans use to describe the evil of human selfishness...and for those who do not give a damn about the well-being of others.

      Delete
  19. Academics leave grad school and pick apart their dissertations to create scholarly articles and books, in the pursuit of tenure. The result is usually not bedside reading, nor should it be the yardstick by which we measure success. I'm most impressed when academics successfully write for a general audience. Based on the publisher's description of Dr McFarland's book, it sounds like there is material that could potentially be embraced by a larger audience. But that book isn't it. I much preferable a writing style like Mr S's that is engaging and relational. A few days ago this blog covered the importance of connecting to others, whether it be a shared nod with a tugboat captain, or a catch-up with former colleagues. When the travel log gets published, I will read it!

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's absolutely none of my business, but your frequent rants against "rampant and egregious ageism" are somewhat disappointing to me, Grizz.

      I understand that, being old like I am, plodding along on the "wrong" side of life's timeline is a bitch and that many young people are not quick to empathize.

      But you (or me, for that matter) complaining about "snark" seems a bit much, since we each often traffic in the same. Older people complaining about the attitudes of younger people have been tiresome since the beginning of recorded history, IMHO.

      Members of ANY generation are individuals -- sure there are Gen Z "sofa kings." There are also those who will be the doctors, nurses, engineers, lawyers, etc. whom this country will be desperately needing in the Brave New World that we're being thrust into.

      Meanwhile, if one were to judge the "older generation" by the orange felon and the millions of supposedly mature adults who've supported his cause since 2015, it seems to me that cynicism and snark are well-warranted.

      Delete
    2. Here's a thought, Grizz: when apologizing, don't repeat the error.

      Delete
  21. At the risk of being too far out of context to comment wisely, and while recognizing that Pancho McFarland himself apparently did not write that two-paragraph blurb on his book that was quoted above, I had some brief thoughts:

    I'm sorry, but this is glop. You're writing for the guy who sat next to you in all the same Poli Sci classes you attended, instead of for the general public, or at least that readership whom you believe will be the eager recipients of your views.

    Put yourself in your reader's place. Look at your writing as if seeing it for the first time. Is it interesting? Does the reader require the same qualifications to read it as you did to write it? Does it make the reader want to turn the page, or close the book?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Wow. This got mean. I did read your book about you traveling around Italy with your father. Sorry, can't recall the title. Anyway, I don't understand the snark, here.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.