For the offended

What is this?

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

'Help me write'


     I read my email. Maybe that's old fashioned of me. I do so because a) I am old-fashioned; b) I'm also interested in what people have to say; b) some readers point out mistakes that I can then fix; c) others share interesting opinions, or situations I should be aware of.
     Then I answer my email, often. Because: a) it seems polite; b) sometimes, in crafting an answer, I coin phrases I like that can use later; c) it helps cement my bond with my audience, such as it is.
     Of late, artificial intelligence, as part of its general insertion of its enormous big money bazoo into our lives, has started offering email suggestions to me.
     For instance. Ken W. of Palatine writes:
     "Donald Trump has spent a lot of time lately calling all kinds of smart people 'stupid.' This is particularly rich coming from a guy who has an IQ of 72 and has the reading ability and temperament of the average 6th grader. He may want to be America’s Hitler, but happily he’s nowhere near smart enough despite his self assessment of being a 'stable genius.' He should have gotten the opinions of the other horses first."   
     While I considered a response, I hit "Reply" and my thought process was stalled by seeing a box filled with this hint, light gray, as if being whispered by some computer Cyrano de Bergerac:

     AI was putting words in my mouth, or trying to. And trite words at that — "a way with words" is a cliche, and not my voice. I tried to delete the suggestion, and instead it became regular print, ready for me to click on SEND. I defined and deleted it, then wrote my own answer:

Ken:

What's the truism about Trump? Every accusation is a confession. Thanks for writing.

NS

     My next step was to shut the damn AI email prompt thing off. I put the matter to AI, ironically enough, and got this instruction.

         Believe it or not, I made sense of that — went to the little gear icon, clicked it, and found my way to this.


     I shut the "Smart Reply" off and a few others for good measure, then returned to answering my email.  
     Not that AI gave up. When I go to reply, there is still two little glyphs — a tiny hypocycloid that seems as if it wandered off the old US Steel logo and a little pencil. Plus the plea, "Help me write," a phrase I've never uttered in my life.
     Now, there is no way I'm going to go with my gut and pronounce AI a bubble. I've seen too many dramatic social changes — heck, I remember pundits seriously explaining how restaurants will go out of business unless diners are allowed to smoke in them. Plus all those hundreds of billions of dollars being poured into it — they must know what they're doing, right? I mean, they can't be throwing their money away? Can they? That would be idiocy.
     Then again, put that way, maybe it is a bubble. There sure is a lot of idiocy going around.

     

24 comments:

  1. Oh AI is absolutely a bubble. Anyone wanting to know why should check out Ed Zitron’s blog (https://www.wheresyoured.at) where he talks about the unprecedented amount of money being poured into a technology with no path to profitability.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for mentioning Ed Zitron’s blog. Insane amounts of money have been spent on AI. The people and institutions propping up AI related companies can’t admit that there’s no clear path to AGI being profitable so they keep pouring more money in. It’s crazy. There are people like Ed Zitron who have pointed this out, but most stories are about how gee-whiz AI is or how the evil artificial intelligences will destroy us. Why aren’t more journalists reporting this? Is it lack of resources or laziness?

      Delete
    2. If I recall, that's exactly what they said about the internet. People are very good, given a little time, in figuring out how to make money at things.

      Delete
  2. I like AI more than most people.
    Not sure where to put the comma

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cory Doctorow had a terrific essay the other day on the AI bubble's impending burst. https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/econopocalypse/#subprime-intelligence

    "AI is the asbestos we are shoveling into the walls of our society and our descendants will be digging it out for generations." Great stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. great minds think a like. I was going to post that as well.

      Delete
  4. Having worked in tech for nearly 40 years, it is 100% a bubble right now and they will figure out that pesky profitability issue. Both can be true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kara Swisher's last two Pivot podcasts (with scott gallaway) have talked about the AI bubble. she compares it to 1998-1999 dot com bubble and points to a lot of examples.

      So glad we have competent leadership to... steer... us... ohgod

      Delete
  5. I get those helpful suggestions too, and I assiduously ignore them. I did not get a college degree and then a Master's degree and spend half my career as a librarian only to concede my thoughts to an algorithm created by some minimally educated post-adolescent tech-bro. My thoughts, and yours, are too significant to bow to the intrusion of AI. Bad enough dealing with auto-correct. Keep writing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Neil,
    I have been working on my family tree for decades. One program that I used-now is using some AI with the disclaimer-‘This information may contain errors’! And oh boy-does it ever.
    Trying to contact the program to correct obvious mistakes is like blowing in the wind. Ignored.
    How do I know I’m receiving some incorrect information about long-gone relatives?! Because I knew them (I’m old).
    Otherwise-had to double/triple check info to ascertain if it’s correct. Which is rule of thumb anyway.
    As a result, I stopped using that program.
    Also-am a Belfast Titanic Society member- one Zoom meeting was about AI and the fact that the Titanic had one smoke stack that was only for esthetic purpose. AI removed that smokestack! Numerous worldwide complaints apparently were ignored. So someone using AI-looking for a photo of the Titanic may see it incorrectly.
    Every day, find bits and pieces of info that are wrong-but ‘This information used AI and may contain errors’ absolves it of all responsibility!
    Why is anyone using it?!
    Thanks,
    Barb Tomko
    Edgewater
    bally10@aol.com




    .

    ReplyDelete
  7. In fairness to those silly pundits, Jack's on Touhy did go out of business because of the smoking ban.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what they claimed, but the facts are they were flat out lying about that! My guess is the owner was ready to retire & couldn't find anyone to take it over!

      Delete
  8. Who are "they" and why would we think that "they" are able to control their actions? Are "they" developing AI, or is AI already developing itself? And what are we going to do if HAL won't open the pod bay doors?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I saw a clip from one of Neil deGrasse Tyson many interviews and appearances where he was talking about how many kids complain about complaining to their math teachers about how they would never use calculus outside of school.

    After his brief pause he schools the interviewer by explaining that its not just about the calculus, its about learning and triangle your brain to learn. While you may never use calculus, you will benefit immensely just from trying to learn, understand, and practice it.

    Turns out the journey is more important than the destination...

    ReplyDelete
  10. We're busy dithering around with AI and cryptocurrency. We're reducing our military presence in NATO and other places so it can be used against our own citizens and nearby countries. We're a kleptocracy and a growing police state. Meanwhile, China is by far the world leader in clean energy production and inexpensive e-cars. The Pax Americana is over. When empires fall...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Don't know much technology. But word of the day is hypocycloid.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Computers used to be celebrated for their speed and accuracy, and for eliminating or at least minimizing human error. Artificial intelligence is only half accurate in its name, and somewhere between human and spellcheck in its intelligence. I doubt we will reach the singularity, where humans become subservient to machines. More like a duality, where both mankind and technology are lockstep in an unhealthy co-dependency, where each occasionally undermines the other. Somebody has to change the batteries or plug the damned things in, and how else can we access social media to brag or complain?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for the tip on how to get out of the awful suggested response. Done. I don't hate AI on principle, but I avoid it because it's such an energy hog. "Composing an email with an AI chatbot can take seven times as much energy as fully charging an iPhone 16, some researchers estimate." https://www.sciencenews.org/article/generative-ai-energy-environmental-cost
    I'll also pass on a way to get an ad- and AI-free Google search. https://www.no-ads.tech/
    i

    ReplyDelete
  14. The thing about bubbles, aside from not knowing when they're going to pop, is that we don't always recognize them in the first place. If we did, we could take a lot more precautions if not avoid the thing entirely, whatever it was, so that when it does pop, no one is harmed, and perhaps no one notices.

    The best I can say about AI so far is that it's very skilled at writing dry but grammatically-perfect text, which ironically is what makes it stand out so much as being more artificial than intelligent. In some discussion groups in which I participate, it's painfully obvious when someone is just pasting in AI text instead of writing thoughts themselves.

    Amazon seems to have a never-ending battle on its hands to yank listings of AI-written books with AI-generated illustrations. One memorable one spotted on Amazon by my vintage bicycling group a few months back was a biography of Major Taylor, the early-1900s cycling champion, cranked out by a computer. What gave it away was the cover illustration of Taylor purportedly riding furiously in a race on a bicycle with no pedals and no chain, but more significantly, no one had told the computer that Major Taylor was a Black man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If folks thought that humans couldn't make Farcebook any worse, they haven't seen anything yet. Trolls and overseas scammers and data-miners from India and Asia are invading the platform and using AI to supplement their limited English skills.

      These are usually fictional tales. fabricated with the assistance of AI bots, for inspirational purposes. Biographies, historical pieces, and Hollywood profiles of deceased celebrities. Not just as cautionary tales or uplifting vignettes, but probably for some type of monetary flim-flammery as well.
      The more hits and likes and comments, the more revenue generated.

      These stories are excessively long-winded and wordy...a hallmark of AI. Ten sentences when one will do. Ten paragraphs when three are sufficient. Probably time to ship out these people for good...on the ferry to Block Island. Farcebook is bad enough without fakers and charlatans writing too-perfect sob stories and morality plays. Add all the political mishgoss and It's getting almost unusable.

      The worst part? Hundreds and thousands of gullible chumps readily and almost eagerly accept these yarns as gospel truth. AI is really messing things up in these Untied Snakes. And fast.(SG)

      Delete
  15. I am happy to say that I finally figured out how to shut down Microsoft's (AI) CoPilot, which was determined to tell me what to write, or write it for me, even when I was recording things like my dreams or my medical history. If you have Microsoft 365, go to Word, Open "File", go down the column on the left to "Options", open it, and then turn CoPilot off.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Tulip bulbs, anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I get lots of ads for Adobe products. The ads for Adobe Acrobat, promoting AI-generated legal contracts, are downright frightening.There's no way I would rely on that, as either the contract "writer" or the contract signer. The last contract I signed had hypothetical stipulations that my husband and I found objectionable. The vendor said, "oh! But that NEVER happens!" And I replied, "then why is it in there?"
    I don't want AI putting words in my name, holding me to any commitments, or even doing research for me. Not yet, anyway. I will let AI remove unwanted background images from my photos, though.

    ReplyDelete
  18. “Some of us have a way with words and others…hmmm…don’t have way, I guess?” ~ Steve Martin

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor. Comments that are not submitted under a name of some sort run the risk of being deleted without being read.