For the offended

What is this?

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Flashback 1992: High voltage

On the west communications mast of the John Hancock Building in 1992. (Photo by Robert A. Davis)

     Wednesday is the 30th anniversary of my regular column first appearing in the Sun-Times, and I prepared a list of all-time favorite columns to post today. Looking for something to illustrate it, I came across this photo — from before I was a columnist, true, but reflecting a certain spirit. And I realized, much as I like to paint the years beforehand as being spent slumped in the corner of a late night newsroom, waiting for something to burn down, that wasn't entirely the situation. There was fun and adventure too, such as this story — which I somehow never posted before. The list can wait until Thursday.

     A hundred and thirty floors above downtown Chicago, the city is utterly quiet. No car horns, no grinding truck gears, no sirens. Only the endless howling of the wind.
     And, of course, the voices of the workmen, as they scramble over the twin communications masts of the John Hancock Building, which are receiving a rare refurbishing after years of exposure to the brutal elements.
     To hear the workmen's voices, before the wind carries their words away, you must climb up onto the masts, higher than most people care to go.
     "We don't get many visitors," says a paint-spattered Greg Teeters, coming down from a night spent on the towers.
     They work mostly at night because the television and radio antennas lining the masts have power going through them. Those antennas could cook somebody. But shutting off the power is not always easy. During ratings sweeps week, one TV station refused to cut transmission and work had to be suspended.
     The antennas are shaped strangely — a pair of interlocking, curved sausages; a batwing grill; several giant snare drums; a few clusters of boxes. Some stick out at right angles. They act like vocal cords for the wind.
     "You hear it singing," said Phil Elliot, one of the workmen on the site. "Boy, it's pretty wild."
     About two dozen workers are taking part in some aspect of the project. Most are ironworkers, familiar with working where a misstep means instant death. All say that focusing your attention on safety and work, and ignoring the height and danger, is key.
     "You don't think about it, that's the thing. You just do it," said William "Bud" Mudd. "You start thinking about it, you screw up."
     The work, which began in early August, was divided into three stages. First, the red beacons atop the masts were replaced. The 2 1/2 foot-tall aviation beacons, 1,455 feet, 6 inches above the street, had been untouched since the building was dedicated in July, 1968. They had not burned out, but 24 years of weather faded their glow and corroded their circuits.
     Next, the tops of the towers were painted, for the first time in 14 years, by workers wearing lifelines, with plastic half-gallon jugs of paint hanging off their belts. This was the phase where winds caused delays. The project was to have wrapped up about now, but will continue for several more weeks.
      The last phase of work is being done now on scaffolding at the base of the masts. The bases are more accessible than the tops, so have been painted several times. Old layers of paint are scraped off before the new can be applied.
     Here came more delay, as the scaffolding crews, unused to the height and the winds, stopped work under conditions ironworkers didn't blink at.
     For a layman setting out to climb the towers, the journey is both fearsome and incredible. The Hancock elevator makes its final stop at the 98th floor, which is jammed with pumps and wild electrical gear, such as 3,000-amp fuses the size of tomato juice cans. Their elements are packed in sand to reduce the damage when they blow up.
     A stairway to the 99th floor reveals television equipment — big steel cases, marked with network logos. Another stair leads to the 100th floor — the roof — where air-conditioner steam floats out of giant, 10-foot-wide horizontal fans, slowly turning. Atop the boxlike "penthouse," a grove of white pole antennas, faintly visible from the ground, waves like bamboo in the strong wind.
     To go further, you must climb. Hand over hand, up a ladder, about 400 feet from the roof to the top beacon. At first you are inside a roomy metal cylinder — the white solid base of the mast, as seen from the ground. Inside, it is hot, and you are surrounded by conduits and naked copper pipes.
     After about 100 feet, you clear the cylinder, exit a hatch, and are outside, surrounded by the triangular structure of the middle section of the tower. Even in summer, the metal chills your hands.
     The climb through the triangular structure seems frightening only until the final ascent: a free-climb scramble up a narrow set of metal pegs jutting out of the thin pipe that tops each mast. It is not for the faint at heart.
     "Tower people have to be a unique kind of person," says Seth Elliot, president of Communications Site Management, the company overseeing the project. "Not totally insane — if you got crazy people, you've got a problem. They need to be calm, cool and collected, but with a certain degree of bravado. It's hard to find people to do that kind of thing."

            — Originally published in the Sun-Times, Oct. 4, 1992

  

29 comments:

  1. As one with an aversion to heights, I twinged with discomfort on occasion as I read this excellent piece. Having learned what it is like up there, I feel better about never having attained that elevation in person. I thank you for having done it instead!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Started hyperventilating just reading this

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vivid depiction. First thought, no thank you. Which brings us to Alex Honnold...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agree with the others, Don't do heights. Lived for several years on an upper floor of Marina Towers facing the river. Could NEVER come closer than three feet to the balcony railing. Had friends that would LEAN over the railing to admire our view. Nooooooooo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been to the 45th floor there & leaned over the railing. It was sure noisy up there, you could hear all sorts of car horns honking & general traffic noises.
      But climbing up the Hancock antennas, no way!

      Delete
  5. I'm getting the hebbie-jebbies just reading this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No mast climbing here, just the knowledge of what the roof of the Sears looks and feels like, thanks to a long-ago friend who worked for a company that had occasional roof access.

    And yes, the quiet is surprising.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mad respect Mr S.

    I' ve spent some time climbing both professionally and for recreation.

    Fear of heights is a healthy fear.

    You were a very handsome young man

    ReplyDelete
  8. Climbing that high without experience is impressive. I was a lineman for the electric company. We went a bit higher in increments during training to get used to it. Seemed that after about 50 feet, it was all the same.
    I liked to have a cigarette when I got into working position. Relax and savor the view.
    I remember those red safety belts in the picture. They were replaced by full body harnesses, with leg and chest straps, lanyard with a decelerating strap. If you fell wearing the red belt, the sudden stop could snap a spine. But you'd still be alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First off, I absolutely love the photo and hope its hanging on the wall of the Mr S's office. It says so much about Mr S, his job and his adopted city, Chicago.
      But after admiring the photo, I looked more closely at that red safety belt. I was hoping someone with "high altitude experience" would comment, and Terry qualifies.
      My question was, "is that belt supposed to be loose like that, and how is it supposed to work, exactly?". It didn't look very reassuring to me, especially when I imagined falling overboard while wearing it. Now that Terry has confirmed the belt had the potential to break your spine, I'm wondering if the looseness was meant to distribute the impact of deceleration. In any case, I'm very glad the safety mechanisms have improved over the years, and that Mr S didn't have to test the usefulness of that belt.

      Delete
    2. Yes Terry safety harnesses have come a long way over the years hell I remember when nobody wore them.

      I still encounter a cowboy now and then and you're damn right after 50 ft it doesn't really matter.

      Jill the elasticity of his gear was pretty much non-existent and certainly would have injured him whether it was broken ribs or spine it was just death they were trying to keep you from experiencing

      Nowadays people who climb for fun or work up high use dynamic ropes they have elasticity built into them and are made so that they absorb the energy of the Fall these ropes help you to not get injured along with the new harnesses and the helmet all the things that a person should wear while at work or at play

      Delete
    3. We'd say, cynically, that clean-up after a fall was easier.

      Delete
  9. I tried to visualize where you were standing. I searched for a picture of the towers that are painted red, but couldn't find it. The best I could find is here: https://c7.alamy.com/comp/G7TNX9/closeup-of-the-very-top-of-one-of-chicagos-most-noted-skyscrapers-G7TNX9.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you look at the photo you link to, there's a point where the solid towers — were you climb inside — give way to a lattice, where you're climbing inside the framework, but can see outside. The last third is like a telephone pole, with rungs, and for the record, I didn't proceed up that part.

      Delete
  10. I think I qualify as to the "calm, cool and collected" requirement; and perhaps with the "bravado," maybe even leaking over into "foolhardiness" at times, but to be honest, the "bravado" snuck away a few years ago, probably about the time Neil was daring the gods from the peak of their electronic fortress.

    tate

    ReplyDelete
  11. Even as a person relatively unbothered by heights, that last bit about climbing the pegs shook me. Hardest possible "nope."

    ReplyDelete
  12. As someone else with a fear of heights, I agree with the other replies - this was a hard read. Mr S., you are way braver than I.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Congratulations - I agree with the comments above being intensely afraid of heights ever since I stood paralyzed by fright on my way up to an observation deck at the Indiana Dunes. I recognize the symptoms and discreetly remove myself from the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. And let's also give props to photographer Bob Davis who was right there with you, and carrying at least some amount of equipment with him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. props indeed. like as, i think it was ann richards, said. ginger rogers did the same thing as fred astaire, but backwards, and wearing high heels.

      Delete
  15. WOW!!! I can't think of another word to better describe my feelings after reading this exceptional story. I loved the quote by Phil Elliot about the sound of the wind singing. Having visited the cocktail lounge on the 96th floor and seeing spiders outside the windows, I have to ask if you remember seeing any living critters when climbing the tower? The thought of race cars whizzing around an oval track at 250 mph is nothing compared to the courage (or insanity if you like) of the men doing that work. Then of course, an intrepid reporter hearing the words, "We don't get many visitors," also requires a certain sense of humor.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Only the endless howling of the wind." At that altitude, it's pretty constant. No friction from foliage or manmade structures. Same thing out on the Lakes. Hence the strength of onshore winds.

    Was wondering if you checked the weather forecast for the Chicago area that day, Mister S. What season was it? Early fall? A strong cold front could bring a visit from Gustav (as in Gustav Wind) while you were climbing. And then you would have been in a bit of a sticky wicket. Literally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aug. 29, 1992. My journal says: "Up B4 3 a.m., shower, drive down to Hancock for story on crews painting the masts — why do all the creepiest stories (i.e., the morgue) also involve waking up early? Perhaps it's a blessing — too tired to fully assess what's happening. Met Robert 4:15 ... after considerable hassle got to 99th floor & to roof. Climbed 1/2 way up western mast. I could have gone higher, but was worried about stamina failing me & being stranded at the top." It did rain later that day.

      Delete
    2. The journal entry makes the story even better!

      Delete
  17. So jealous! I've always wanted to experience being on the roof of a tall skyscraper. Your photo is even better than the pictures and video that Tom Skilling posted somewhat recently from the roof of the Sears Tower.

    In the '90s I worked for a law firm in what is now Chase Tower in Houston (75 stories). When I left that job to move back to Chicago, our office manager offered to ask building operations to let us tour the roof together....but, alas, he wasn't able to pull it off. I was extremely disappointed. Great story - thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor. Comments that are not submitted under a name of some sort run the risk of being deleted without being read.