For the offended

What is this?

Sunday, July 12, 2026

"Bagel" and "Biden" have the same number of letters — could they make it any clearer?

     My faith in humanity is such, that I can have trouble with extreme stupidity. I think: "They must be joking, right? This can't be serious."
      Take the meme to the right. What they're saying is, here is this 1967 medal, showing a plane flying into the Twin Towers. It's all part of a Jewish plot.
     Now look closely at the medal, and the supposed World Trade Center. See the little nubs on top? See the writing. It's a torah. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out. All you have to do is look closely.
     Why am I writing about this?
     Good question. I guess Saturday was busy — working on Monday's column (AND Wednesday's column. AND preparing a string of posts to run after some upcoming surgery. AND working on the book — news about that soon. And visiting the Lincoln Park Zoo. And dinner on Wells Street, at Topo Gigio).
     So I needed to write about something. And this meme...
     I write about what interests me. Mostly. Sometimes I write about something suggested by an editor, or a reader, but I suppose that's still about something I find interesting, with a helping hand.
     Occasionally that thing that caught my fancy will resonate with readers — such as the article on Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham, which pinballed across the country — so much so that an editor mentioned it to me, which seldom happens. But I knew I'd grabbed the brass ring, because John Williams asked me to talk about it with him on WGN. To me, that means I've snatched the brass ring.
     During our conversation, I said something to the effect that, if I made a practice of writing about stupid stuff found online, it's all I'd ever do. That's true. Low-hanging fruit. A duck in a bucket. Too easy.
     However, sometimes something is just, well, too good to pass up. Like this meme.
     A reminder that conspiracy theories are history for stupid people. They prefer airy fictions to actual facts, I suppose, because the latter require thought, and reading, and a base of knowledge, while the former you can grab one fact — or, in this case, mis-perception — and run with it.
     When I look through Instagram (I don't do TikTok or Threads. Instagram is plenty) and consider how much political opinion is formed by that, and how little is formed by essays such as this, well, one wants to abandon all hope. But that doesn't strike me as a success strategy either.

1 comment:

  1. "Conspiracy theories are history for stupid people." I like that.

    Sorry to hear about the surgery in your future.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are posted at the discretion of the proprietor, so do not go up immediately. Please try to post under a name of some sort, so that other readers can differentiate between commenters.