For the offended

▼

What is this?

▼

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Flashback 2000: Flying without the greatest of ease

Jon Weiss does his job (photo courtesy of ABC News)


     Labor Day is this Monday, and I've been thinking about jobs, and the meaning of work, and what makes an occupation interesting. Which, strangely, made me remember this column.

     The Human Cannonball hasn't called yet.
     He was supposed to phone at 1 p.m. Now it's 1:30. Another professional milestone: waiting by the phone for the Human Cannonball.
     Excuse me: "Clown 'n Ball." Jon Weiss, the "Human Clown 'n Ball." He's with the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus, which pulls into town next week.
     I will admit I am a sucker for the circus. I would go every day. I think that's the problem with days like today: a heightened sense of circuslessness.
     I did not ask to talk to the Human Cannonball — excuse me, Clown 'n Ball — because he blasts 65 miles an hour, reaching 5 Gs of force as he leaves the 9,000-pound device.
     I wanted to talk because of the Supreme Court case.
     What, you don't remember Zacchini vs. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company? It's one of my favorite cases. The right to privacy is not guaranteed in the Constitution, but was cobbled together through court cases, and it is one of the minor glories of America that a landmark of privacy law developed from a man being shot out of a cannon at a state fair.
     Hugo Zacchini's act consisted of being shot out of a cannon into a net 200 feet away.
     In the fall of 1972, Zacchini was performing at a county fair in Ohio. A reporter from a local TV station showed up with a camera, and Zacchini asked him not to film his act. The reporter didn't but, pressured by his boss, returned the next day and secretly shot Zacchini being shot out of a cannon. The 15-second act was broadcast that night on the 11 p.m. news.
     Zacchini sued, claiming "unlawful appropriation" of his "professional property." He won, then lost on appeal. After only five years the case wound its way to the Supreme Court. Justices White, Burger, Stewart, Blackmun and Rehnquist sided with the human cannonball.
     "The broadcast . . . goes to the heart of petitioner's ability to earn a living as an entertainer," wrote White, ruling for Zacchini, a decision which, in my layman's eyes, seems to touch upon this whole Napster mess.
     Just now the phone rang. Jon Weiss, the Human, er, Clown 'n Ball, calling from Cleveland.
     "I've always admired the cannon act," said Weiss, who joined the circus as a clown in 1982, then shifted to the cannon. "In 1987, one of the double-barreled cannonballers decided he'd had enough — it's very stressful. You have to have a lot of confidence in your ability to do it. Once you lose that confidence, that's it."
     So how do they shoot a man out of a cannon?
     "We try to keep it a trade secret," he said. "It's almost like a magic trick; everyone wants to know how it's done, but we try to keep it within the circus industry. It's very dangerous."
     He hadn't heard of the Supreme Court case, but he was familiar with Zacchini.
     "He's from a very famous family," Weiss said. "Mariel, Hugo, there's a bunch of them. They invented the repeating cannon — it shot one person, then a second person."
     Weiss told me he has been shot out of a cannon nearly 5,000 times. Does it, I wondered, ever get dull?
     "It's never the same," he said. "I try not to make it dull. You always try to improve what you're doing, trying to fly further or straighter or land different."
     Weiss has three young children — Jonny, 5, Nicole, 3, and Max, 8 months. How does being shot out of a cannon — which Weiss likened to being in a car wreck or getting punched in the kidneys_compare to raising small children?
     "What I do for a living is not work," he said. "Work is raising kids. It is a lot easier being shot out of a cannon than raising kids."
     Sure, but how many stay-at-home dads could fill the Allstate Arena? Not that they'd want to. They'd probably get stuck having to clean up afterward.

     — Originally published in the Sun-Times, Oct. 26, 2000

14 comments:

  1. Ah, the days of decent Supreme Court Justices.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've always assumed there is a giant air powered piston that pushed them up & out of the cannon. I doubt it uses any explosives, as he would be deaf from it then.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well Clark Street I guess you never seen it. There are definitely explosives that are part of the presentation. That may well not be what propels him out of the barrel but explosives go off when the spring or the air pressure launch him.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Will never forget watching the '92 Winter Games, being held in France, at one of the bars near Wrigley. Next to me was a woman I knew slightly, from the bleachers. She was pretty buzzed, and it seemed like she just couldn't stop knocking her boyfriend.

    "He's a real clown" was what she kept telling me. Said it at least three times.
    And not only was he a clown, but he traveled a lot. He was in Florida at the moment.

    Eventually, she pulled out a snapshot of the guy. He was in face paint.
    He was wearing a polka-dot suit. He was at the Ringling Bros. winter quarters.

    And, yes, her boyfriend WAS a real clown..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That story didn't end as I thought it would. Very funny Grizz. She was setting you up for the punch line.

      I do the same sometimes about my wife. I tell people I question my wife's judgement. Yes, since the day she married me!

      Delete
    2. Yeah, it turned out to be a laff riot. A good joke. She wasn't hitting on me, and I had no interest in her. Made it sound that way on purpose. Setting the reader up for the punchline. Just clowning around.

      Did not know her well, but it was pretty obvious that she had quite a problem with alcohol, and I didn't want to deal with anyone like that.

      Was going through a divorce at the time. Already had enough troubles of my own. A one-night stand with a drinker would have only been a brief diversion.

      Delete
    3. That should have read: "She had quite a problem with alcohol, and I didn't want to deal with that." She was not the problem...her addiction was. Sorry about that.

      Delete
    4. Towards the end of WWII my dad established a package liquor store and bar on West 63rd Street, west of Western Avenue. He'd open about 10 AM and sit in the back, between customers, eating his breakfast of yogurt and saltines, while reading a Chicago newspaper. I would sit with him, also reading, and one day I read that Ringling Brothers was coming town. Any Chicago child could attend the circus by entering a letter writing contest and winning a ticket. So, unbeknownst to my parents I entered a letter. My dad was furious when I won, saying, "We're not poor, You took another child's ticket. etc, etc." And my response was, "It said ANY child." Well, Dad drove me down to the meeting point, where he left me off, by myself, with no family adult, and I saw the circus. To this day (I'm now 85) I have no memory of how I got home.

      Delete
  5. "Work is raising kids. It is a lot easier being shot out of a cannon than raising kids."

    Words to live by.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "A decision which, in my layman's eyes, seems to touch upon this whole Napster mess."
    What is "Napster"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Napster was a file sharing application, primarily associated with the distribution of digital audio files. It was launched in June 1999.. Due to lawsuits alleging copyright infringement, Napster was shut down in July 2001 and filed for bankruptcy in June 2002.

      Delete
  7. Napster is intellectual property theft commonly known as peer-to-peer music sharing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never understood why Naptster was intellectual property theft but VHS, Betamax, and Casset tapes were not.

      Delete
    2. Because they could trace Napster trades, but couldn't know how someone was using a (blank) videotape or audio cassette. If they set up a questionnaire before buying one, you could always say "it's for recording my kid's birthday party."

      Of course it was IP theft, but they couldn't *prove* it.

      Delete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.