![]() |
| "Physiologie du Flaneur," by Louis Huart (Metropolitan Museum of Art) |
I try not to admire Lee Bey too much. Out loud, in public, that is. Because the Sun-Times architecture critic is a modest man, and it's unseemly to have a colleague, particularly one as sketchy as myself, always gushing on about you.
Beside, the truth is obvious, and I try not to traffick in the obvious — Lee embroiders and enlivens the paper with an endless stream of fascinating columns about the rich architectural heritage of Chicago. Someone should give him a Pulitzer Prize, right away, and the fact they haven't yet, is one of the many indictments of that particular award (or heck, maybe I blame them unfairly. Maybe he's never been submitted — he is, as I said, humble. I've never submitted my stuff, because my time is precious, and chasing awards is not worth it. I wouldn't be surprised if Lee feels the same).
Privately admiration is another matter. I regularly look up from one of his columns, briskly gesture to it with a snap of the hand, and mentally address an unseen audience: "This! This is how you do it!"
I can't recall ever abandoning a Lee Bey column halfway and stopping — he grabs you by the nose, drags you through whatever subject is at hand, even if its some obscure building you never previously heard of or could imagine yourself caring about until you hit that first sentence.
Last week Lee did something which is, well, very rare, at least for me. He was writing about a massive, Frank Gehry-designed desk in the lobby of the Inland Steel Building that is going up for auction. And he unleashes this. See if what stopped me will stop you too:
Privately admiration is another matter. I regularly look up from one of his columns, briskly gesture to it with a snap of the hand, and mentally address an unseen audience: "This! This is how you do it!"
I can't recall ever abandoning a Lee Bey column halfway and stopping — he grabs you by the nose, drags you through whatever subject is at hand, even if its some obscure building you never previously heard of or could imagine yourself caring about until you hit that first sentence.
Last week Lee did something which is, well, very rare, at least for me. He was writing about a massive, Frank Gehry-designed desk in the lobby of the Inland Steel Building that is going up for auction. And he unleashes this. See if what stopped me will stop you too:
"Widely read Chicago flâneur and architecture-watcher Lynn Becker brought attention to the auction last week on social media.""Flâneur"? I'd never read that word in my life. I sometimes deploy words that puzzle readers, but rarely encounter one that puzzles me. It's a treat.
See, this is the bond Lee and I have — we are not only interested in a wide variety of stuff, but we assume our readers are also interested in a wide variety of stuff and, in addition, are not stupid. (When stupid people do write in, violently objecting to some piece of sense I've presented them with, I sometimes reply, with genuine astonishment, "But I didn't write it for you...")
So Lee can deploy flâneur and assume that either readers already know it or if they don't, can quickly look it the fuck up. Which I did: "A flâneur (from the French verb flâner, meaning to stroll or saunter) is a 19th-century French term for an urban wanderer who casually explores a city without a set destination, observing society with a detached but deeply engaged eye."
At the risk of putting on airs: that's me. Well, not the "without a set destination" part. Typically I'm heading to some restaurant for lunch, or up to the Newberry Library to raid their stacks. But I give myself plenty of time, and walk, mentally twirling a cane and assessing the landscape. You can't imagine how many columns I've found that way.
It's not an obscure term. Baudelaire waxes poetic about what he called the "passionate spectator."
I was curious as to where Lee picked up " flâneur" so decided to do that reportorial trick and ask.
"That's a great word," said Lee. "I think I learned it my first go round as architecture critic," (Lee left the paper for a while, to our horror, to work for Skidmore, Owings and Merrill and help Richard Daley's administration not mess up architecture as badly as they messed up everything else, as well as teach and half a dozen other projects before returning, thank merciful God, to us). "I can't remember where I picked it up, some odd place like Mad magazine or National Lampoon. I thought, 'I like that word.'"
So Lee can deploy flâneur and assume that either readers already know it or if they don't, can quickly look it the fuck up. Which I did: "A flâneur (from the French verb flâner, meaning to stroll or saunter) is a 19th-century French term for an urban wanderer who casually explores a city without a set destination, observing society with a detached but deeply engaged eye."
At the risk of putting on airs: that's me. Well, not the "without a set destination" part. Typically I'm heading to some restaurant for lunch, or up to the Newberry Library to raid their stacks. But I give myself plenty of time, and walk, mentally twirling a cane and assessing the landscape. You can't imagine how many columns I've found that way.
It's not an obscure term. Baudelaire waxes poetic about what he called the "passionate spectator."
I was curious as to where Lee picked up " flâneur" so decided to do that reportorial trick and ask.
"That's a great word," said Lee. "I think I learned it my first go round as architecture critic," (Lee left the paper for a while, to our horror, to work for Skidmore, Owings and Merrill and help Richard Daley's administration not mess up architecture as badly as they messed up everything else, as well as teach and half a dozen other projects before returning, thank merciful God, to us). "I can't remember where I picked it up, some odd place like Mad magazine or National Lampoon. I thought, 'I like that word.'"
See? Before I let this go, I have to point out the comfortable-in-one's-skin quality reflected in Lee's speculating on where he got the word. Mad magazine. Or National Lampoon. Not exactly Architecture Digest or Domus or any of those high hat trade publications. I can't imagine Paul Goldberger saying, "Yeah, it's something I glommed from a Bugs Bunny cartoon..." One of the many benefits of being a Chicago journalist working for a Chicago publication with Chicago colleagues for Chicago readers in Chicago. We get to be both flâneurs, when we choose, and normal people too.





