‘The community stood behind us.'

     Ross Cosmetics was closed for Independence Day on July 4, 2022.
     But, as any business owner knows, being closed to the public doesn’t mean there still isn’t work to be done. So Earl Edelcup, who owned the Highland Park variety store with his wife, Arden, thought he’d go in to the small, windowless office tucked behind a gray curtain in the back of the store and get some paperwork done.
     About the same time that Edelcup was driving from his home in Highwood, authorities say Bobby Crimo, 22, later told them he was taking up his position on the roof of one-story Ross Cosmetics.
     News accounts described what Crimo went up as a fire-escape ladder. But it really is a sturdy, steel-and-concrete stairway to the second-floor apartments around the back of the buildings at Second Street and Central Avenue. The police say he was carrying a Smith & Wesson M&P15 semiautomatic rifle, one of five guns he owned, and three 30-round magazine clips.
     The Highland Park 4th of July parade began at 10 a.m., half an hour after the children’s and pet parade. The police say Crimo started shooting at parade goers from above Ross Cosmetics at 10:14 a.m., firing 83 shots in quick bursts, leaving five dead, two dying and dozens wounded.
     Just after the shooting stopped and the man who fired on the crowd descended the stairs, Earl Edelcup showed up.

Earl Edelcup

     Routine can put blinders on anybody, and Edelcup, 59, had worked at Ross since he was 12. He didn’t hear any shots or sirens or take note of the eerily empty street, cluttered with baby strollers. He didn’t see the bodies.
     He had no idea anything unusual had happened until he stood at the front door and began to insert his key.
     “What are you doing?” someone, running past him, shouted.
     “I’m just going in to work,” Edelcup replied, puzzled.
    The person kept running.
     That gave him pause. Edelcup turned, looked around and saw a police officer who asked him if he owned this business. Earl said he did.
     “Is this safe?” Edelcup asked. “Should I be here?”
     But the cop was gone.
     Edelcup didn’t go in. He got back in his car and called his wife.

To continue reading, click here.

Ten years after

 

The Thompson Center and City Hall, July 1, 2013

    Friday morning was more eventful than is usual. But things quieted down about 5:30 a.m., and I had some time to myself. So I thought about my blog post for today, Saturday — I like to get them out of the way early, so I don't have to worry about them later — and looked at my camera roll, for inspiration, settling on a photo I took of a big cucumber from my garden.
     Soon I was lost in the etymology of the word "cucumber," reading the Oxford English Dictionary and various niche dictionaries, the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the index in Mencken's "The American Language," plus "Gulliver's Travels" and the Bible. I learned a lot.
     When I was done, about 6:15 a.m., I realized that if the cucumber exegesis was posted today, it would run on the 10th anniversary of the creation of this blog. An idea I liked, to mark the day without comment beyond a dissection of cucumbers. No need to crow. "Self-praise is self-condemnation," as Cervantes writes. 
     But another consideration came to play — that's what writing is, weighing one factor against another. I really liked my cucumber reflection, so much that I thought it might make an out-of-left field early July treat in the newspaper. So I held it for ... not Monday, that's already written. Wednesday then. 
     Which leaves today open. And I am sort of glad. A man writes a blog every day for a decade,  3,652 days — the two extra days for the leap years of 2016 and 2020 — without fail, and he should ... what? 
     Take a bow? There is a desperate, Daffy Duck quality to that. Falling to one knee, spreading my arms at the Hollywood Bowl. Almost begging for the chorus of crickets. Most people don't read the blog and don't care. I read it. I write it. I care. What's there to say?
     Give thanks? That's better. I really, really enjoyed writing this blog these past 10 years. Sure, I'd have liked it to send shock waves through the media world. But it didn't. Everygoddamnday.com does not bestride the city like a colossus. I rarely ever meet anyone who reads it. Doesn't matter. As I once said, "and my garden isn't ConAgra either, but I plant tomatoes every spring." Why? I like doing it, and enjoy the result, especially the scenes from my family, preserved in amber, like this, about my older boy, or this, about the younger.  They're priceless to me. The boys don't seem to know or care.
     At five years, the anniversary was noted by media columnist Robert Feder. He's enjoying a well-deserved retirement, but our mutual friend, Eric Zorn, mentioned the 10 year anniversary on his fine Picayune Sentinel, mostly allowing me to reflect on the experience.

     I asked myself if there are any new features I'd like to add, and I've begun a box, "10 YEARS AGO ON EGD," tucked on the upper left side of my blog page. I don't plan to change the post every day — not every post is worth a second read, so once a week seems ideal — but it'll spotlight essays from a decade ago that I believe retain their currency. Today I feature the very first, explaining what I'm trying to do here.
     I want to thank my wife, Edie, who stopped urging me to just abandon the quotidian aspect of this blog several years ago, and doesn't mind my regular trips to the office to bat something out. She accepts it, and I appreciate that. Thanks as well to the owner of the superlative Chicago icon, Eli's Cheesecake, Marc Schulman — he has been my sole advertiser since the beginning, paying good money for the privilege — some of his cash is in my wallet now. I can't imagine it is a sound business strategy for him, though perhaps he values the unhinged panegyrics to cheesecake that I write every year to welcome his holiday advertisement. I sure do. 
     Eric Zorn has been a consistent booster of the blog, as has John Williams on WGN. Charlie Meyerson of Chicago Public Square convinced me to send out an email every morning with a link to today's post, and that seems to have goosed my numbers. The blog toted up more than 140,000 hits in June, which strikes me as a lot, even if a suspicious number of those occurred in Singapore. 

     Timothy Mennel, an executive editor at the University of Chicago Press, asked me to write a book based on this blog, "Every Goddamn Day: A Highly Selective, Definitely Opinionated, and Alternatingly Heartbreaking and Humorous Historical Tour of Chicago." Like the blog that inspired it, the book did not set the world on fire when it came out last October. But I loved doing it, and appreciate those on the Chicago scene who supported it, particularly Rich Melman, Shermann Dilla Thomas, Bill Savage, Don and Terese Schmidt, Christie Hefner, Joyce Winnecke, and everyone else who showed up at a signing or bought a copy. 

    Speaking of which, why don't you buy one now? You won't regret it.
     Who else? Thanks to all those who acted as copy editors and fact checkers, and who added their trenchant remarks afterward  — Tate and Grizz and Bitter Scribe and the rest.  I'm proud to have such thoughtful readers.

     Thanks to Caren Jeskey, who wrote on Saturdays for nearly three years, first from Austin, Texas, then here. I enjoyed sharing her unique perspectives, and was proud of myself that even though I didn't always agree with what she was saying, I was able to step back and let her speak. Thanks to the writer friends who gave it a try after she stepped away, such as Jonathan Eig and Gene Weingarten.

    Letting others have their say struck me as a step toward humility, which has been an elusive quarry in my life. "The only wisdom we can hope to acquire/Is the wisdom of humility," T.S.Eliot writes in "East Coker." "Humility is endless."
     As is this blog. Oh, it'll end someday, through some circumstance — I'll be hit by a bus — but the blog will float onward down the lazy river of the Internet, I hope, forever. "A kind of rump immortality" is how I described it to Robert Feder. I like to think of it like one of those interactive computer game worlds, like Myst, where readers at some future point can find it and poke around and learn things and derive meaning and pleasure from life that otherwise might elude them. Long after I'm gone, somebody will read something and like it and be enriched and comforted. That's a lot.
     Or maybe some circuit will pop and the whole thing wink out. Just as well. Nothing lasts forever, and the key is to like what you're doing while you're doing it. Be glad while you are alive. I enjoyed writing the thing, and am gratified that an undefined, constantly changing group of people enjoyed reading it. Thank you.

Colleges can still grab that trombonist

     The United States Supreme Court is wrong in its ruling Thursday that affirmative action is unconstitutional. The easiest way to understand why is to consider what, if not race, colleges can still consider when evaluating students for admission.
     Can they use athletic ability as a guide? Sure! How are the Big Ten supposed to field competitive football teams otherwise?
     Can they give special consideration to legacy applicants — the children of grateful alumni? Of course. If the college goes broke it can’t admit anybody, and multi-generational bonds bring home the bucks.
     Foreign students paying full freight? Check. Hollywood stars stepping back from the limelight? Double check.
     As anyone knows who has ever taken a prospective freshman tour, led by a perky sophomore fiercely proud of her ability to walk backwards while delivering paean of praise to alma mater, colleges consider all sorts of qualifications. If they need someone from Idaho so they can say they enroll students from all 50 states, the bar is nudged downward for an Idaho applicant. If the band is short on trombones, then this is the lucky day for rising seniors who list “trombone” as their passion.

     But being Black or Asian, apparently, doesn’t affect one’s life the way, oh, being captain of the high school chess team does. Not according to the Supreme Court. Ruling in two lawsuits, against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, it decreed that their efforts to ensure an integrated college violated the 14th Amendment guaranteeing “equal protection under the law.”
     Or in Chief Justice John Roberts’ words: “The student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race. Many universities have for too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”

To continue reading, click here.

The air hurts

  

     Chicago had the worst air quality in the world on Tuesday. The sky was smokey grey. Wednesday didn't seem much better. I was downtown both days, attending to business at Navy Pier.
     "If you go outside, wear a mask," my wife texted. Considerate as always. I didn't mention that I had tucked a cigar in my briefcase to smoke if I had any downtime downtown. I sorta liked the image of sitting the middle of some global air quality emergency, puffing on a stogie. It smacked of defiance, if not common sense. When the sun blows up, the last human being on earth will be standing tall, giving the supernova the finger.

    Nah, will have vanished billions of years earlier. We're on that path.

    More people were wearing masks downtown. I didn't, because the air didn't affect me much — maybe a little extra watering around the eyes at the end of the day. My wife suffered more. I defrosted some matzo ball soup to combat the ill effects of toxic air, a folk remedy so inadequate it seemed almost poignant, like treating an infection by singing to it.

    Blame wildfires in Canada. The numbers were staggering. This sentence leapt out of one report: "The amount of land burned so far is 4,000 percent of the average amount." Forty times times the usual. But that story was from a few weeks ago. Now it's 50 times. Tommy Skilling, trying to put the situation into graspable terms, observed that an area as large as West Virginia has burned.

    In case it isn't staggeringly obvious, the cause should be pointed out:

    “Climate change, including increased heat, extended drought, and a thirsty atmosphere, has been a key driver in increasing the risk and extent of wildfires in the western United States during the last two decades," the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration observed. "Wildfires require the alignment of a number of factors, including temperature, humidity, and the lack of moisture in fuels, such as trees, shrubs, grasses, and forest debris. All these factors have strong direct or indirect ties to climate variability and climate change.”

     Is there hope? Probably not. But we can grasp at anything. I went to RL Restaurant for lunch Wednesday, hopped on a bus at Navy Pier, and was surprised to see it was an electric — the CTA has run them, experimentally, for two and half years now. It pulled up under a large square box and an orange connector dropped down so the bus could charge while it sat there, waiting for passengers. Very high tech.

     I chatted with the driver — he said that unlike electric cars, the electric buses are slower. "Even the doors open slower," he said. Still, given the air quality, it was comforting, if you didn't think about it much, to see this wan attempt to combat the global emissions problem though, as is typical of human response to gradual ruin, too little, too late.

Nikki Haley’s search for lost times

     I try not to use fancy words. OK, stop laughing; it’s true. I did it just now — my fingers itched to type “recondite words” — meaning “obscure.” But I held back. Flaunting your vocabulary is showy and pretentious, and what’s the point of writing something that nobody understands?
     But sometimes a word is too perfect, sitting there, waving its little lettery arm in the air, serifs flapping, straining, going “Ooo, ooo, me me.” Eventually, you relent and use it.
     Like “revanchism.”
     The dictionary defines revanchism as “a policy of seeking to retaliate, especially to recover lost territory.” This can be figurative as well as literal. You want something back you once had, or think you had.
     Revanchism is the primary moving force today in the Republican Party, and understanding it explains much. The entire Trump monstrosity grew out of a promise to claw back what was lost. “Make America Great Again” implies it sure ain’t great now, not with all these immigrants and minorities strutting around as if they belong.
     To that end, the GOP is trying to grab the steering wheel and put the nation into a skidding U-turn. We hear that every time Ron DeSantis opens his mouth and wages his cruel two-front war on trans kids and Black history — we don’t want to see the people we once didn’t have to see.
     That includes even supposed moderates like Nikki Haley, who sent a three-sentence tweet that roiled Twitter like a cinder block tossed into a koi pond:
     “Do you remember when you were growing up? Do you remember how simple life was, how easy it felt? It was about faith, family and country. We can have that again, but to do that, we must vote Joe Biden out.”

To continue reading, click here.

"Fireballs of dissention"

     "Fireball" is one of those words that has a clear literal meaning — a ball of fire — but no obvious figurative uses. If I say someone is a "firecracker," it's obvious that I don't mean they're an exploding tube filled with gunpowder, but someone with a vivacious, sparkling personality.

     But who or what would a fireball be? The term does come up figuratively in baseball — pitchers with a very fast fastball as "fireballers." That's an exception, though.
     It isn't used very often. Myself, I only deploy the word in one setting, again very literally. We'll be on the highway, and a car will blow past us, weaving in and out. 

     "I'll drop back," I say to my wife, "and avoid the fireball."

     So it was odd on Sunday to encounter the word, not once, but twice, in independent situations. My Ohio friends and I were strolling on the beach at Put-in-Bay, and I noticed a pile of Sprite cans, along with a scattering of little single serving empties of Fireball, a gross cinnamon whiskey drunk by youngsters, the gustatorily challenged and emotionally immature.
     There are other products that use the term — Atomic Fireball candy, made by Chicago's own Ferrara, a reminder that the mushroom cloud rising up from an atomic bomb was called a fireball. Both share an unsubtle cinnamon connection, and I suppose giving it the "Fireball" moniker is an attempt to cover up its harshness with intentionality: it's supposed to taste this searingly bad.
     I wouldn't have given the word a second thought. But later in the day, my friend and I had to pop into his old wooden barn, and we looked in on his 1947 Buick convertible, which normally we ride around the island in, the cynosure of all. The old beauty been acting up, lately, and is in need of repairs.
     "Do you want to see the engine?" he asked — I didn't recall ever seeing the engine in the car before, and I've been riding in it since I was 17.
     "Sure!" I said. (Now that I think of it, I bought a new car in January, without ever popping the hood to look at the engine, and have not done so once since. I can't think of any kind of defense other than I assume it has one).

     He opened the massive hood as I thought of the relevant lines from Bruce Springsteen — "big old Buick" —and there, for the second time in an hour, was the word "Fireball" (which, upon reflection, is not the best name for a part of the car receiving gasoline).
     Seeking other uses, I consulted Wentworth and Flexner's Dictionary of American Slang and found "fireball" defined as, "An ambitious efficient, and fast worker; a very active person."
     Online, I noticed that the American Meteor Society defines "fireball" as "another term for a very bright meteor" and encourages readers to report any sightings back to the AMS, including as many details as possible, such as brightness, color and duration, for inclusion in their Fireball Sightings Log.

     In 1907, there was a "Fireball" racehorse, and "fireball" was used to describe an orb-shaped gas light, which were sometimes erected on a cement stand "to safeguard the boulevards and compel motorists to be careful." They were common enough on Chicago streets to be described as "familiar" — there were several on Michigan Avenue — and motorists complained about them.  

      My Oxford English Dictionary has mostly literal meanings: "A ball of fire or flame; applied esp. to certain large luminous meteors, and to lightning in a globular form." It traces "fireball" back to 1555, noting that it also describes balls of coal dust used to kindle fire, and includes a few figurative uses, such as this, from 1718: "At this Time there were Fire-Balls of Dissention flung all over the Kingdom."  

     That's certain evocative of the incendiary nature of dissent. Though doesn't it seem that, lately, dissent is not the exception, but the rule? We've become a society of complainers, objecters, arguing forcefully for whatever private individual phantasm holds us in thrall. It's been a while since anybody worried about our being a nation of sheep and, in all candor, a bit of conformity in any realm would be met with gratitude and relief.  

Zealotry is never satisfied.

Julius Gari Melchers, "Mother and Child" (Art Institute of Chicago)

     Religion is supposed to be voluntary, right?

     I mean, imagine that a particular sect — say the Jews — found a way to force one of their idiosyncratic ritual practices on the general public. Let's say Kosher food laws.

     That wouldn't work well, would it?
     What if cheeseburgers were suddenly illegal in half the country, due to judicial decisions? Pork chops, banned in 20 states. 
     Even though it wouldn't be all that inconvenient. Yes, plain old burgers are never quite as good. But nobody's life is going to be severely altered. 

     And they'd have reasons: it's healthier! Morally superior! No risk of boiling calves in their mother's milk. Billboards along the highway would go up, showing plaintive calves, begging not to be boiled.
     Still, it just wouldn't fly. People would rebel.
    Because Jews are an extreme minority. And their rituals are unfamiliar. And not many people care much about cattle.

    So why ... why why why ... when it comes to arcane Christian practices — Christian sexual practices — is somehow forcing a particular religion on others is okay? Maybe because they struck upon a really good metaphor — not calves, but babies. Warm cute cootchie cootchie coo babies. And convinced themselves, and others, that these entities — in reality unborn fetuses — were babies, and had to be protected. Car seats. Fuzzy blankies. And an abortion ban. A ban that went into effect in half the country a year ago, on June 24, 2022, the day Roe v. Wade was reversed. 

    You know the story. Yet it doesn't seem to enrage you. Or anybody else. Women haven't risen up. Because some buy the fiction, and others are cowed, or complacent. Though what has happened is that American attitudes have shifted. Abortion, which is supposedly murder, is now more popular than ever — about two-thirds of the country think it should be legal in the first trimester. Where it is illegal, no women or doctors are finding themselves in jail (because the zealots behind it don't really think it's murder, generally. That's just words they say when imposing their religious practices on others by law). Plus, having finally got their way, zealots move to the next step in their dance back into the imaginary past, going after contraception. And gays. Because zealotry is never satisfied. Repression of unbelievers is the end, not the means. 

      Which is another reason the democratic system of voting and elective representation is under attack. It isn't just about worshipping Trump. He's a symptom, remember, not a cause. A symptom of an extreme minority trying to impose its will on the majority of non-believers. Welcome to America, 2023.