Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Flashback 2011: One quarter of the country has gone crazy

Generated by Dall-E.
     The good news is that the vise grip that Donald Trump has on the Republican Party seems to be slacking. The bad news is that they don't need him to continue the carnival of crazy. As I've been saying for years about Trump: he didn't create the environment he thrived in. Not a cause, but a symptom. In case this isn't clear, I offer as evidence this column from 2011 that tills the loamy soil that Trumpism, and other fact-free totalitarian causes, bloom in. Trump cut his political teeth as a proponent of birtherism, but didn't even merit mention here.

     The expression "my jaw dropped," is usually metaphorical, the writer reaching for some oomph beyond "I was really surprised."
     But reading the New York Times/CBS poll released last week that 25 percent of all Americans — and 45 percent of Republicans — believe President Obama was born outside the United States, I could feel the muscles in my jaw go slack and my chin dip.
     Why is this so amazing?
     Well, first, let’s review the evidence that Obama was born someplace other than Kapi’olani hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961:
     There isn’t any.
     None, nada, nothing. A slop bucket of rumors and lies. As opposed to the overwhelming hard proof that Obama was born exactly where he said he was born — a state birth certificate, not to mention two local newspapers printing birth announcements.
     So why does a considerable and growing chunk of the country — one in four, the same percentage of Americans who are men over the age of 37 — embrace this fallacy?
     The short answer is they believe it because they want to believe it. Belief and fact have almost no relationship to each other — we should know that by now. There is no situation so clear-cut that it cannot be twisted into a hall of mirrors. The 9/11 attacks were the most documented crime ever. Did that stop the conspiracy theories? No way.
     That said, why do 25 percent of us want to believe Obama was born in foreign soil?
     It’s obvious when you ask yourself what happened in November 2008. The nation elected its first African-American president, a Democrat. Of course that would inspire some to say, "Whoa, wait a second, this isn’t happening. This guy can’t be president!"
     He can’t? Why not? Well, umm, because he wasn’t born here. Yeah, that’s the ticket!
     Conspiracy theories flourish among those who find the truth too uncomfortable to tolerate. America being the victim of terrorist attacks made the nation sympathetic — better, in some minds, to view the United States as the perpetrator. The same dynamic inspires Holocaust denial. People don’t deny the Holocaust because of lack of evidence — those Germans, sticklers for bookkeeping. Rather, the Holocaust is uncomfortable, inconvenient to those wishing for the next one, and thus nutjobs like Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad find it easier to just grin and insist it never happened.
     Obama being president of the United States is uncomfortable, inconvenient, for a lot of people, and rather than acknowledge that a majority of Americans elected him to an office he is entitled to hold, it’s easier to declare the whole thing a sham.
     Just as Holocaust denial is, on its face, anti-Semitism, so the birther movement is clearly racism. I’m reluctant to say that because racism has become such a frayed charge in recent years, thanks to professional wolf criers like the Rev. Jesse Jackson or Carol Moseley Braun. But just because some overplay the race card doesn’t mean that racism ceases to exist. Electing a black president might have been a milestone, but it did not make the bigots automatically wink out of existence, unfortunately. Where did they all go?
     To me, the sort of people who in 1961 would say, "Obama can’t be president because he’s a n-----," now, 50 years later, are saying "Obama can’t be president because he’s not an American." Progress!
     Although I refuse to believe that haters constitute a full quarter of the country. My hunch — or perhaps just hope — is that the birther mania is fueled by a hard core, say 2.5 percent, the full-time bigots, psychos and partisan operatives who come up with these lunatic theories and weave loose threads into this elaborate tapestry of delusion. Then the other 22.5 percent look at the "issue," feel it resonate in their guts, let out a few moos to tell a pollster that it all makes sense to them, then drop their muzzles back into the silage.
     You know what? I’m going to start a movement right now, insisting that Obama can’t be president because he isn’t 35, as the constitution requires. Barack Obama is only 32 — he was born in 1979. There, you read it in a newspaper. That this claim is false, contradicted by all evidence and common sense might be seen as a stumbling block, but not judging from the success of the birthers. People will believe anything that scratches their itch, and would much rather change the facts of the world than alter their opinions.
      Twenty-five percent. The jaw drops, the eyes pop, the mind reels, the heart breaks.
        —Originally published in the Sun-Times, April 24, 2011

19 comments:

  1. What's even stranger, is that his first opponent, John McCain actually was born outside of the US.
    His father was a naval officer stationed in the Panama Canal Zone & he took his wife there with him. When she became pregnant & was due to deliver, none of the US military hospitals in the Canal Zone had a maternity ward, so she was sent to a Panamanian hospital in Panama City, Panama & she gave birth to him there.
    Wikipedia says he was born on August 29, 1936, at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone, but I remember the news articles from 2008 that said otherwise.
    But no one questioned his location of birth, as that was because his father was stationed overseas & than made him as legally allowed to be president as anyone born in the USA!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Obama were born today he would have been a US citizen even if born outside the US . When Obama was born (to a US citizen) there was a “physical presence” requirement for the parent in order to trigger automatic citizenship that his mother was too young to possibly meet. While being on a US Military base was considered physical presence I don’t think McCain ended that since his mother didn’t even marry ( and perhaps leave the country for a base) until she was 21. One needed at that time to have been physically present in the US for five years after age 14 to make one’s offspring US citizens automatically no matter where they were born amd Roberta Mc Cain met this requirement.

      Delete
  2. Donald Trump dabbled in politics as early as 1987. His first official run for president was in 2000.

    I know more about the legitimacy of the moon landing that I do about anyone's birth certificate. Birthplace parents nationality or religion.
    Because I watched it on television along with millions of other people.

    There are still nut cases that believe it was a hoax.
    Why is anybody surprised by this and why do we even acknowledge these people?

    Fact free totalitarianism is basically the governmental system that we live under now.
    How did congressman Santos get elected without people discovering it? He was completely full of shit?
    We fool ourselves about freedom. It's limited at fast and we fool ourselves about our effect on government policy and action. We play a very small part in how our government functions. And they do whatever benefits the people who have money. Lots of money so maybe we're not totalitarianism, but we're definitely an oligarchy.
    Whether it's the Democrats or the Republicans Trump or Biden the government chugs along
    Without much consideration for the average citizen.
    I'll give you a Trump was much worse. Much much worse than pretty much any president we've ever had, but Biden? Dear God!
    What an ineffectual leader

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll bet there are a lot of Ukranians who might disagree with you.

      Delete
    2. You are undoubtedly correct. Yet Russia invaded and annexed Crimea during the Obama administration. The current Russian effort to retake Ukraine happened with Biden as president.

      Ukraine may yet lose that war and it's sovereignty and if they do it will probably be because we didn't come to their aid with military force.

      It's a tough situation and I don't think I have a good idea on how to solve it and I'm all for bashing Donald Trump in any way possible, but Biden is not a good leader.

      Delete
    3. A lot of Ukrainians and a lot of Americans, too. So our buddy Franco thinks Lightfoot's performance warrants a second term, but finds Biden ineffectual, despite the evidence to the contrary. Let's all have some of whatever he's been smoking! ; ) Portraying "fact free totalitarianism" as a both-sides issue is pretty surprising given what's transpired in this country, particularly for the past 3 years.

      Delete
    4. Biden is the leader we've got. I wish he were younger, but when he opens his mouth, the right words come out, generally. I'm not sure who said it, but you have to fight with the army you've got.

      Delete
    5. Donald Rumsfeld said that, IIRC.

      So in 2011, we were only worrying about 25% of the population? We were so innocent then.

      Delete
    6. I thought the same thing, Coey, about the 25% figure. While the twice-impeached guy "didn't create the environment he thrived in," he certainly normalized a lot of nonsense and brought a lot of previously reticent flakes out into the open.

      From "25 percent of all Americans" believing "President Obama was born outside the United States" in 2011, to 46.1% of voters going for the orange charlatan in 2016 to, incredibly, 46.8% witnessing the 4-year train wreck that ensued and still backing him in 2020.

      Disturbing.

      Delete
    7. Yes, that was good news, Franco, which definitely goes on the positive side of the ledger for the mayor. I'll try to bear it in mind as I fume about the sweetheart deal she gave NASCAR so that they can get a foothold in the North, at the expense of a chunk of Grant Park being off-limits for a month-and-a-half during our brief summer. Nothing says we're concerned about Climate Change quite like having a bunch of race-cars doing loops around our front yard for the benefit of folks who don't live here.

      Delete
  3. As I have mentioned before a couple of times , The Patriot Act is the most oppressive piece of legislation foisted upon the American people if not ever at least this century. Biden claims to have written it. Read it. Read legislation and white papers. That's policy and statutes.
    Read Lori's crime initiative and invest southwest it's on the cities web site. She's not looking to imprison most of a race . See Clinton crime bill from the 90s you folks call yourselves progressives. ok boomer

    What politicians say doesn't amount to much more than foder for the media. what they do ends up in writing. That dictates how we are governed.

    Laugh if you must but read . There are things to be learned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Biden is not a good leader." Oh. Then that makes his ability to defeat the Biggest Loser, help hold onto the Senate in the midterms, and the number of things he's managed to sign into law in 2 years despite having to deal with Manchin and Sinema even more impressive.

      "what they do ends up in writing." Indeed, the things that Lightfoot has done to alienate so many of the people who voted for her have been written about in the newspapers.

      Delete
  4. At the risk of stating the thuddingly obvious, despite whatever Biden's shortcomings might be regarding the US support for the war in Ukraine (I don't really see many, though the Republicans may be more of a hindrance in future), if Trump was in office, Putin's invasion would have ended in triumph long ago.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My mother, who was 88 at the time, favored Biden over Obama in the '88 primaries. She knew who Joe was, but to her, Obama was still an unknown quantity (she was no longer living in Illinois). I worked for Obama twice and voted for him twice.

    After I read the 2014 New Yorker profile of Biden, I knew that he was the man to succeed Obama. He probably would have done so, if not for his son's death. Not everybody wanted...or liked...Hillary.

    Which means...what? That I've been ridin' with Biden for quite a while now. He has not disappointed me...and I will vote for him again. Me love you long time, Joe!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OOPS...make that the '08 primaries...not '88 (although Joe was...briefly...a candidate for the '88 nomination). Nobody pointed out the mistake. Which might mean that nobody even bothered to read it. I hope I'm wrong.

      Delete
    2. I read it, Grizz. It was a simple typo, clearly, repeating the age of your mother as the year of the Obama / Biden primaries. No big deal. I gotta say, though, that the later in the day one comments, the fewer the number of people who read it. As for a comment the next day, or later, it seems like you've only got nuts like us noticing. : )

      Delete
    3. And if you wait two days, like I'm doing right now, it's a lot like a stinking pile of...fish. Fish that's been left lying on the dock, in the sun, for that long. Nobody wants to go near it.

      Delete
  6. OOPS...make that last comment FOUR days old, not two. Stinko!

    ReplyDelete

Please feel free to comment on my Facebook page.