![]() |
Photo by Jaclyn Nash, courtesy of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History |
We remember feminism of the 1970s without also recalling exactly what women were being militant about: their voices being muffled, their power minimized, their issues ignored.
Pagan Kennedy's new book, "The Secret History of the Rape Kit: A True Crime Story," is a disturbing journey back to the bad old days of Chicago a half century ago. And maybe, the way we're going, a glimpse into our future, too.
The book begins with the sexual abuse of the author, trauma both specific and universal. "The warnings of sexual assault carried inside them an even more demoralizing and insidious message: This world is not for you."
Then Kennedy settles into the story of Chicagoan Martha "Marty" Goddard, whose life changes after volunteering at a phone hotline for homeless teenagers.
"I was just beside myself when I found the extent of the problem," Goddard said. "The runaways were pregnant, homeless, suicidal, strung out."
She realized she had "stumbled upon a dark and terrible underworld."
Police would arrest young women, for solicitation or vagrancy. The abuse that had sent them fleeing into the streets wasn't considered. "No one talked about the crimes that had driven those girls out of their homes."
It was "a culture in which cops played pranks on victims, making them the butt of sick jokes. At least one officer persuaded a woman to strip naked, so that he could photograph her wounds as evidence. He then passed the photos around to his buddies, as if they were porn."
Mayor Richard J. Daley deployed a taunt when the subject of corruption arose — "Where's your proof?" — that served double for rape victims. It was her word against his, and everybody knew who was trustworthy, who unreliable.
The solution was to collect evidence immediately after these crimes, which led to the rape kit, a box filled with swabs, combs and other equipment designed to collect evidence after a woman — or man; 9% of rape victims are men — was assaulted.
Goddard championed the kit for both its practical and ideological value: "It's true power came from a new set of ideas," Kennedy writes. Ideas starting with: What happens to women matters.
The kit was named, not for Goddard, but for a Chicago police sergeant, Louis Vitullo, and unpacking that fact brings us back — and maybe forward — to a world where women carry less authority than men. Having a man's name made the kit more acceptable to law enforcement that, frankly, couldn't be bothered investigating sexual assault.
To continue reading, click here.
Ever watch PBS Finding Your Roots? Notice how often Professor Gates, upon discovering an "alternative" paternity, assumes the "liaison" was consensual? Especially if within close proximity? Gets a kind of a smirk face. Isn't there too much in recorded history, and experience, to make that the default assumption?
ReplyDeleteI always find Finding Your Roots fascinating. There is much you have to read that falls between the lines.
DeleteHow would you prefer that Gates phrased it? "Well, it turns out that your great grandmother was not fathered by Wilbur as she had been lead to believe, but by a man named Lewis Powell who worked as a blacksmith in nearby Walnut Grove. He probably raped her, but we can't be too sure".
DeleteProfessor Gates should simply state the verified DNA information, any other factual information his staff has accrued, and nothing else other than "have your relatives ever spoken of this?" If the celebrity wants to speculate on camera that's their choice.
Delete1 in 5 US women are sexually assaulted (rape or attempted rape) and that's just those reported now that we're "woke". Fewer than 7% of reported rapes are prosecuted. Less than 4% of prosecuted rapes are convicted. Again, that's now that we're "woke".
Upsetting. Thank you Neil.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDeleteI find that 9% figure for men who have been raped to be suspect. It seems awfully high I googled around and found a couple of studies that put it at one and a half percent of rape victims are men rape being one of the most extreme forms of sexual assault but I don't mean to be splitting hairs it just seems way off.
ReplyDeleteThank you for keeping such an extremely important issue in the spotlight a national tragedy that mainly affects women and girls.
Very informative.
ReplyDeleteIt's articles like this that really strike fear deep in my heart.
ReplyDeleteSo much of what we have won as a society was paid for on the backs of people who get no credit, and still lost everything.
No one seems willing to stand up to a bully, even when they have everything now and it is crystal clear that they will lose it all.
When did the world become so filled with paper strong men. Endless funds built on nothing. Coattail riders who claim to be self made. Fools who take them at their words and don't even question it.
And the worst part, so many of those paper lines only care when its the rape kit of their kid.
I judge a person on how they treat the lowest member of society. When you have nothing to gain, how do you act, what do you do, that's who you are. That's who we are. and right now, a vast majority of the population don't deserve what they have.
And some wonder why rapes are often not reported. They didn't care then and who's to say if they care now.
ReplyDeleteYou wrote a column 20 years back, saying newspapers were going extinct. I emailed you saying you were crazy and you replied that gas attendants who used to fuel up your car were gone. I hope you won't be proven right.
ReplyDeleteThe 1 minute movie critic was awesome, I bought the Friday paper and immediately read the reviews.
Thanksgiving and Christmas editions with all the flyers and Black Friday deals were a tradition in my circle!
The high school football coverage was the best in Chicago. The rankings of the top 20 teams was bragging rights at the bars.
The editorials were excellent up until about 2007. The paper went a little too hard left for my liking. My friends too.
We bought the paper every day since we were freshman in high school.
You lost the working class who subscribed and bought from your advertisers.
You had Bill O'Reilly and a few other conservative columnists in the 2000s. I always loved Jesse Jackson's columns too! Mary Mitchell is a Chicago legend.
Maybe hire some MAGA columnists. I know your position on Trump but 50% of the country voted for Trump and you're running a business.
Keep the Left Wing editorials but give everyone a voice.
Run a campaign telling the city you're making a fresh start.
That 50k circulation will go back to where it was 20 years ago.
As much as I disagree with the paper in the last 15 years I want to buy it every day again.
The newspaper business is a business and frankly Liberals are cheap.
Conservatives support their content creators.
Throw us a bone @Neil and we'll come back.
MAGA has plenty of brass horns trumpeting day and night.
DeleteFrankly liberals are cheap? Have you looked at humanitarian MAGA spending personal and taxpayer money? On who and what again?