Sunday, October 26, 2025

Erie Canal, the ditch that made Chicago great, marks its 200th birthday

 


     The Erie Canal is one of those historical topics that traditionally make eyes roll up. It's so pre-industrial, and mule-centric. But as a student of the origins of Chicago, I knew that there is a fascinating tale there, one not only key to the development of the city, but also important today in this time of rapid technological change. I was so certain that last November, when we drove to Cooperstown for Thanksgiving, I detoured 45 minutes to Lockport, New York, to eyeball the thing, and take the above photograph. I'm glad that the paper recognized that I'd found something worthwhile, and splashed the story across the front page, and hope you agree.

     What was the most significant event in the history of Chicago?
     The Great Chicago Fire? Wrong. The 1893 World's Fair? Wrong. The Cubs winning the World Series in 2016? Tempting ... but no.
     Those don't count. Because Chicago was already a dynamic city when they occurred. What happened to create a major metropolis here in the first place?
     Time's up! The most important thing to ever happen in the history of Chicago — for starters, it's the reason Chicago is not a city in Wisconsin — isn't well known here because it didn't happen here, but 500 miles east, exactly 200 years ago Sunday: the opening of the Erie Canal, a 363-mile waterway, 40 feet across and four feet deep, from Albany, on the Hudson River, west to Buffalo on the northeast tip of Lake Erie.  
     The opening was announced by a cannon firing in Buffalo at 9 a.m. Oct. 26, 1825, with the news echoed across the state, all the way to Sandy Hook, New Jersey, by guns placed within earshot of each other.
     As that cannonade reverberated, kicking off eight days of celebration, Chicago was a swampy nowhere, a log stockade fort and, maybe, 100 residents. St. Louis, "the Rome of the West," had 100 times the population. There were more enslaved miners digging for lead in Galena than there were residents of Chicago.
     So how did the Erie Canal push Chicago to the forefront?
     The canal meant a ship could sail across the Atlantic Ocean, pass New York City, travel 150 miles up the Hudson and transfer cargo to flatboats at Albany. Those boats would transverse the state via canal, load goods and passengers back onto schooners at Buffalo to range across Lake Erie, up the Detroit River, across Lake St. Clair and the St. Clair River, up Lake Huron following the contours of Michigan, through the Straits of Mackinac down choppy Lake Michigan, to be deposited on its southernmost point, at Chicago, which on an 1825 French map in the Newberry Library was the name of the portage where Native-Americans carried their canoes from the Chicago to the Des Plaines rivers.
     If that sounds arduous, it was easy compared to the previous system — ox cart — unchanged since ancient Greece. Considered an engineering marvel on par with the pyramids, the Erie Canal cut shipping costs by 90%.
     Not everyone got it. President Thomas Jefferson, in a rare moment of short-sightedness, withheld federal funds, calling the canal idea "a little short of madness." New York Gov. DeWitt Clinton made it his personal project. Work on the canal began July 4, 1817, three days after Clinton took office.
     Some called it "Clinton's folly." Others immediately saw the canal's implications, including Nathaniel Pope, the Illinois territory's delegate to the House of Representatives.
     The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 set the northern border of Illinois as a continuation of Indiana's northern border, cutting Illinois off from access to Lake Michigan.
     Pope pressed Congress, already rattled by storms that would lead to the Civil War, arguing that being connected to the Great Lakes and the East, via the nascent Erie Canal, would tie Illinois to the Union.
     Without lake access, Illinois's proximity to the Mississippi might draw it into the camp of the restive South. Congress agreed and pushed the state's border 60 miles north.
     That's why Chicago is in Illinois rather than Wisconsin. What got it going as a city was the prospect of the goods of the world landing at the sand bar blocking the mouth of the Chicago River. Where would they go from there? What would be loaded for the return trip? The soldiers at Fort Dearborn got busy excavating the mouth of the river, while the federal government began developing the port of Chicago.
     Meanwhile, a dream that began when Joliet and Marquette visited Native Americans here in 1673 — a canal leading to the Mississippi — was put into motion: The Des Plaines River wasn't good for much beyond canoe traffic. But If a canal could be dug from the Chicago River, 96 miles south to the Illinois River at LaSalle. Then boats could continue into the Mississippi and down to New Orleans. The Erie Canal dropped Europe on Chicago's doorstep; the I & M Canal would invite South America, too.
     Such A canal cost money. had to be paid for. There was one readily available resource here: land. Chicago was surveyed and platted up so lots could be sold to finance a canal, plus land along the canal route.
      If you look at the original James Thompson Chicago map of August 1830, you'll recognize Loop streets — Wells, La Salle, Clark. And west of the river are two street names that hint why this is being done: Clinton, for the Erie-building governor of New York, and Canal, which kind of gives the game away.

To continue reading, click here.

21 comments:

  1. Great stuff, thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That was great, Neil. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Enjoyed some history this morning with my coffee! Never sure what EGD will bring but never boring! Thank you NS for your work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wonderful! Absolutely wonderful, Neil! As was your Chicago Architecture River tour with Lee Bey.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Now I can't get the tune out of my head!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Clinton and Erie! Another great piece of Chicago history.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That's one for history books. I'd like to recommend the Chicago Maritime Museum in Bridgeport for a visit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fantastic piece! Wonderful, and fitting, that it got the front page.

    For anyone interested in more detail, and broader history on this (including how that efficiency also brought invasive species to Chicago), I can't recommend highly enough Dan Egan's book, "The Death and Life of the Great Lakes." It was not a topic I would ever have sought out on my own, but I found it a very compelling read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bought that book last year. Now all I have to do is read it. Your recommendation might be the push I needed.

      Delete
  9. What a great piece of our history! Thank you, Neil, for digging into it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Way more important than I ever knew. I just read that I&M canal boat tours permanently ended on September 28th. That is sad.

    ReplyDelete
  11. When Illinois residents sought statehood, they knew that access to Lake Michigan would be critical to the state's economy, because of the construction of the Erie Canal. Illinois sought a border adjustment that urged Congress to locate its border nearly sixty miles to the north. There were multiple reasons for this.

    First, Missouri was also about to become a state...a slave state. The drift toward civil war was already becoming a concern. A new state "connected" to New York (via the Lakes) would give "security" to the Union--and allow Illinois to channel goods and resources through the Lakes as an alternative to shipping them through the South, via the Mississippi.

    Secondly, the proposed canals that Illinois needed to divert commerce to Lake Michigan depended on access to the network of rivers (the Rock, the Fox, the Des Plaines, and even the Kishwaukee) that lie in the sixty miles of flat land between the Wisconsin hills and the proposed Illinois-Wisconsin border. Not having this access could have jeopardized the canal ventures, including the I. and M. Canal.

    Apparently, there were not yet enough Cheeseheads in the Wisconsin Territory to voice a serious objection. Wisconsin's population growth lagged far behind Illinois and the other states in what came to be called the "Middle West." The fact that it was the last of these states to acquire sufficient population for statehood significantly altered its borders, including its northern border with Michigan, which took the "Upper Peninsula" as compensation for the land it lost to Ohio in the "Toledo War" of 1835.

    Wisconsin strongly objected to the loss of the U.P.--but still lacked the political clout to prevent it--just as Michigan had lacked the clout to fend off the designs of Indiana and Ohio.

    All of the above is from a wonderful book called "How the States Got their Shapes" by Mark Stein. It's a fascinating read, with magnificent maps. You will learn a helluva lot. Years ago, the History Channel turned it into a two-hour show and ANIMATED the maps. Might still be available.

    How Michigan became two peninsulas was discussed at EGD on 9/18/18, at which time the above comment originally appeared. If it rang a bell, it's because it's been posted before. Seemed like a good time to repeat it. Happy Birthday, Erie Canal!

    ReplyDelete
  12. The canal also played a big roll in the population make-up of Illinois. Originally settled from the bottom up (think Abraham Lincoln's family who moved from Kentucky to Indiana to southern Illinois), the canal opened northern Illinois to an influx of people from New York and New England (think George Pullman and Potter Palmer, among others).

    ReplyDelete
  13. This column was a wonderful counterpoint to "all the rest of it" in today's newspaper. I have to mentally steel myself to read the paper these days, so was especially grateful to find such an interesting history lesson in the paper today. History is lost so quickly! I appreciate that the origin of the street names "Clinton" and "Canal" were explicitly provided- even with the history lesson, I didn't make those connections on my own.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great column! I'm always interested in the historical pieces. I've lived my entire life in Lemont, which is an I&M Canal town, so this literally hits home for me.

    I've ridden my bike along practically every inch of the I&M Canal from Willow Springs all the way to LaSalle. The canal was filled in going through Joliet, so don't look for it there. Some stretches no longer have water and there is a spot in Marseilles where it is no more than a swale with gardens planted in it. Mostly it still flows though, and there are restored aquaducts over the Fox River and over Aux Sable Creek. The remains of four locks in Lockport are interesting, but downstream in Channahon the locks are in better shape. A lot of history along that muddy ditch.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I lived a few blocks from the Illinois and Michigan canal for 3 decades. I biked the path and kayaked on the canal countless times. It is a beautiful linear park now that is a must visit. Wonderful article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I knew people in Lemont who were instrumental in lobbying for the creation of the Heritage Corridor. At the time I didn't understand what they were doing, but it turned out to be a wonderful thing. Something akin to creating a National Park. These people put a lot of time and energy into it.

      Delete
  16. Good read. Very interesting books on canals and more in the Chicago area by Richard Lanyon, former executive director of the MWRDGC. https://www.dicklanyon.com/

    ReplyDelete
  17. There's good birding down by the I&M Canal Trail in Channahon. Thanks for this great read!

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor. Comments that are not submitted under a name of some sort run the risk of being deleted without being read.