Monday, February 2, 2026

'Code of silence' no big secret in Chicago, where every cop is well-versed


     How disappointed are you that former Mayor Rahm Emanuel won't be testifying about the Chicago Police Department's notorious "code of silence" in federal court? At least not during a civil trial that starts Monday, stemming from cops bursting into the wrong home in 2018 and driving a woman, her four children and half-naked grandmother outside at gunpoint?
     Yeah, me neither.
     God bless Rahm — his tenure looks better every day. Emanuel didn't give away big chunks of city infrastructure in spectacularly disastrous deals that cost Chicago billions, like his mentor, Rich Daley. Nor did he flounder around in endless paroxysms of maddening, can't-anyone-work-this-crazy-contraption confusion, like his two successors. He should take his eyes off the White House and settle for the consolation prize of being mayor of Chicago, again. All is forgiven.
     But spilling the beans on the CPD code of silence in a speech in 2015 doesn't make him privy to some big state secret. Any cop stuck on the stand could say the same thing, in theory.
     Heck, they could subpoena me. I'd tell 'em. A week after Emanuel revealed the cop “tendency to ignore, deny or, in some cases, cover up the bad actions of a colleague,” I tapped Craig B. Futterman, a law professor at the University of Chicago, a national expert in police ethics and the guy whose legal clinic got a tip about the existence of dashcam video showing Jason Van Dyke pumping 16 shots into Laquan McDonald.
     Futterman didn't mince words.
     "Chicago is the capital of the code of silence," he said. "If you break with that code, you get crushed."
     Cops will claim they must have each other's backs because no one else will. Thin blue line, yadda yadda, cue the heroic music. You have to count on your partner in that dark alley; your life depends on it. If the public only understood how incredibly difficult being a police officer is, they'd overlook any innocent, in-the-heat-of-the-moment mistake, or years of unchecked sadistic and racist abuse.
     The results speak for themselves. Chicago police shoot more citizens than almost any other department in the U.S., some years grabbing the No. 1 spot, and payouts for wrongful death lawsuits are staggering in a city circling the financial drain: $1.11 billion from 2008 to 2024, according to the Chicago Reporter, with another $300 million piled on in 2025.
     Not only are they expensive, but bad apples make police work harder — solving crimes takes the cooperation of neighborhood residents, who tend to become skittish and quiet if their only experience with police is being abused by them.
     I have to admit my bias here. Forty years of trying to pry anything out the department yap has taught me: The CPD doesn't just have a code of silence about misdeeds. It has a code of silence about everything.

To continue reading, click here.

Sunday, February 1, 2026

"Make it be spring"

Natasha

     Margaret Atwood didn't just write "The Handmaid's Tale," you know. She's also a poet — 18 volumes published, as many collections of poetry as she has novels. So today being the 1st of February, I feel permitted to dig out her poem "February," which begins:

Winter. Time to eat fat
and watch hockey. In the pewter mornings, the cat,
a black fur sausage with yellow
Houdini eyes, jumps up on the bed
    We'll leave the watching hockey to her — Atwood is Canadian, after all, she doesn't have much choice in the matter. The poem — I can't print it in full, but you can read it here, on the Poetry Foundation site — is mostly about the cat, on its surface. Lounging in bed, on her chest,"breathing his breath/of burped-up meat and musty sofas."
    Perfect, right? But of course the poem is much more than that. The cat is a metaphor — plainly stated — for the male aggressiveness that is such a leitmotif through Atwood's writing. 
It’s all about sex and territory,
which are what will finish us off
in the long run.
     Can't argue that, not with President Grab-'Em-By-the-Pussy turning impotent geriatric rage into the driver of American policy, foreign and domestic. 
     The poem made me miss our Natasha, who we lost in June, an absence deeply felt — she was 16, and to this day I'll hear a purr-like-sound, or a certain kind of rustle, and look up, expectant, then disappointed. It was the very end, and mercy demanded we put her down. But also a sort of foreshadowing that would look trite in literature, but life has no problem grinding in your face. Natasha's parting was so quickly replaced by other, greater losses — my mother died two days later — that I never even bothered to write about it here before. "My cat died and then my mother and then my cousin Harry and a couple cherished friends" seems straying into bathos. We all got woes. Suck it up, buttercup.
    Atwood ends by beautifully capturing a situation very familiar to all cat owners, though none of us would think to express it so beautifully, or at all, followed by a directive I plan to repeat daily until April.
Cat, enough of your greedy whining
and your small pink bumhole.
Off my face! You’re the life principle,
more or less, so get going
on a little optimism around here.
Get rid of death. Celebrate increase. Make it be spring.


Atop blog: "February," by Hendrik Meijer (Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Quite beautiful


     So Friday morning, busy with research, emails and even a quick nip out to the Bean Bar for coffee with a colleague, slowed toward lunchtime.
     And I thought, "Something for Saturday..."
    At that precise moment, I looked up from my computer screen, at the snow just cascading down, the sky filled with big fat falling flakes. 
    Wonderstruck, I stood up, went downstairs, and walked outside, to take a few pictures on the front porch. 
    "Have you looked outside?" I asked my wife. "It's quite beautiful."
    "Oh my God!" she cried, looking up from her computer, noticing it for the first time. 
     Then I went to the back porch, shot more photos — none seemed to capture the magnificence of the sky, filled with slow. Maybe you needed the motion, or the shockingly cold air, despite which, I had the presence of mind to tip my head back and catch a few snowflakes on my tongue. I'd hate to let a winter pass and not do that. 
     The magic of nature is, it resets us. Snow squalled majestically from the sky for 100 million years before people showed up and deemed it majestic. It cares nothing for our social media or our would-be king. It will fall long after we are done making a hash of things, and go to our final resting places. A good thing to notice it, and appreciate it, while we can, before then.



Friday, January 30, 2026

Minneapolis ICE killings the latest shocks in a haystack of last straws

Still four rings to go. Virgil and Dante being rowed across the River Styx (Gustave Dore)

     Oh honey.
     You think this is going to be easy?
     That's so cute. Have a seat. Let's talk.
     Yes, President Donald Trump had a bad couple of weeks. Two of the courageous Minnesotans confronting masked ICE thugs were shot dead. On video. From several angles. A 5-year-old in a blue bunny hat was photographed, rigid with terror, being hauled away. ("The worst of the worst..." they said). He's being held at a detention center in Texas now.
     Some portion of the American public, which has been — what? Distracted over the past decade? In a coma for 11 years? — stirred. Suddenly Democratic leaders are talking about shutting down the government until... wait for it... a few more rules are put in place for ICE. They must wear body cameras! And uncover their faces!
     Oh sweetie ... we have rules already. They're called "laws." Once upon a time these laws applied to everyone. Now they're mere tinder used by Trump to set American traditions on fire. Rules and laws don't help if they aren't being enforced. Asking for more is like rushing into a burning house and installing smoke detectors in the blazing rooms.
     Put it this way: the two ICE agents who shot Alex Pretti, they're still not charged with any crime, right? Because last time I checked, murdering a man in cold blood because he's recording you with his iPhone is already a crime. Even if you're a member of a paramilitary goon squad.
     Save the high fives for when that day comes.
     Until then, yes, positive signs. These latest abuses were so blatant that even the Lord of the Lies, rather than doubling down, seemed to pause, go all soft focus. He said something dismissive about guns. Greg Bovino, he of the Peaky Blinders haircut and gruppenfuhrer great coat, was dispatched back to whatever banality-of-evil clerk post he occupied before fate gave him a stage to strut upon.
     The liberal sigh of relief rolled across the land like a spring zephyr. Social media crackled with talk of corners turned. Bless our bleeding hearts, we see the sun rise and imagine the world born anew.
     It's so tempting to speculate: could killing Renee Good and Alex Pretti be the last straw?
     Spoiler alert: no, it's not.
     To believe otherwise, you have to ignore a giant haystack of previous last straws.
     Let's work backward.
     Insisting we must invade Greenland in an opera buffa aping of Vladimir Putin, alienating our closest allies, wasn't the last straw. Tearing down the East Wing of the White House without telling anybody wasn't the last straw. Selling the nation's personal data to Elon Musk wasn't the last straw.
     Do I have to walk you all the way back to "Gulf of America"? And beyond. We watched an insurrection. Live on television. A mob, goaded by the president, storming the Capitol, searching for the vice president to hang, assaulting police officers. Jan. 6 wasn't the last straw. We re-elected him anyway. We bought this. Sending it back is no simple task. Totalitarianism isn't an Amazon sweatshirt you can decide doesn't fit. A little snug around the neck. You can't just stop by Kohl's and return the fascism you rashly bought. Nor is this a one-time purchase; it's a subscription.

To continue reading, click here.

Thursday, January 29, 2026

My top ten

 

The Sun-Times took this shot for some kind of promotional campaign that never happened. Yes, I
worried it was affected to take it at the Newberry Library. But one of my rules is: "Be who you are."

     I've written nine books. None of them is a collection of columns. A disappointment to me since, having assembled this list, such a volume would be fun (and easy) to put together. Heck, readers might even enjoy it. But whenever the subject is brought up (always by me) my agent, or whatever editor or publishing type I'm afflicting with my ideas, looks grim, shakes their head, and says the same thing: "Column collections don't sell." Particularly when they're never published. That was true when titans like Mike Royko and Steve Neal walked the earth. It's true now, I suppose. I don't know. I've never had one.
    Oh well, here online, we can do as we please. To mark my 30th anniversary (and yes, this has gone on — well, indulge me. There won't be a 40th) I've put together 10 of my all-time favorite columns over the years. It should really be 30 columns, given the 30th anniversary. But that would be a lot of work, and I can't imagine anyone actually looking at 30. Honestly, I can't imagine anyone looking at 20. Or 10. Or five. Or three. But I do hope you grab one and read it. Such as the one about Eugene O'Neill. My personal pipe dream, that prods me to perhaps work a little harder on these than the average newspaper fodder, is the hope that they might bear re-reading down the line. I like to think I'm right. Though I might be deluded. Like everybody else. Anyway, if you're new to the column, and want to see what pieces I'm most proud of, over the years, these stand out:

1. A great trumpet is 'a thing of beauty, an extension of you' — This is my favorite kind of story, where I pull a thread and see where it leads. In this case, I was visiting my son in Phoenix, and we went to the Museum of Musical Instruments. A fabulous place; think, the Louvre, but for instruments. I went back two more times, eventually noticing that a lot of brass instruments were made in Elkhart, Indiana. Home Conn Selmer. Only 90 miles away. It could have just been a factory visit, but I thought: this story should really begin with somebody playing a trumpet. And who should that person be, ideally? The Chicago Symphony Orchestra's Esteban Batallan. Facts make a story, and the fact about a silver bridge from the mouth of previous lead CSO trumpeter Bud Herseth becoming a plate affixed to the bottom of his horn's bell, well, when he told me, I actually turned to look for the studio audience so I could gesture in his direction, raise my eyebrows, and say, "Can you believe that?"

2. ‘Code yellow: Trauma in the emergency room’ Even before I was a columnist, I was interested in medical stories. I remember seeing the photo of a little boy kicking a balloon at a picnic for transplant recipients and thinking, "How do they transplant those kidneys?" I would watch a kidney transplant, heart transplant, lung transplant. Watch autopsies at the morgue and faces being rebuilt. I'm still at it — right now I'm slated to watch brain surgery because, really, how often do you get the chance? Such stories were never dull. Like any other aspect of this job, contacts are important, and for this story, I had to force my way in. Mount Sinai's initial response when I approached was, in essence. "No. No. HIPAA. No. Again no." But I persisted. By the time I was done with them, their CEO was asking me to be her interlocutor at the City Club. And when COVID struck the next year, Ashlee and I could hit the ground running at Mount Sinai because the door had already been kicked open.

3. You can lead a girl to slaw, but you can't make her eat: The story you set out after isn't always the story you write, and it's important to be ready to turn on a dime, scrap your expectations, and go with something else.  Top chef Sarah Stegner, whom I'd been writing about since she headed the Ritz Carlton dining room, is one of the most socially-conscious people I know, and she views coleslaw as an entry drug for salad, and was going to go to my kid's junior high school and teach the cooks there how to make it properly.
      I went expecting a culture clash between the Polish lunch ladies and the James-Beard-award-winning chef. What I didn't realize was a) they'd worked together before and b) I'd meet Lily Jaeger and her friends, the sort of real life that seldom gets into the newspapers. I was so nervous, falling out of the sky to capture quite intimate moments, that I did something I never do — I called her mother, after the fact, to get her permission to run the column. I didn't want her feeling wronged, and wrecking the joy I felt writing it. She went along. My only regret is not assigning a photographer, though, if I had, I might have been fussing over a picture of some sorts, and missed the details caught in this column. 

4. "A wild roller coaster ride through a dark tunnel" — Asking a question, then acting on it are two key skills to being a columnist. Plus thinking of people other than yourself. Three qualities that went into this column, after I sealed up a Cologuard colon cancer detection kit, containing, well, you know, and then had this thought: "Who opens the jar?" Answering the question involved lots of calls and driving 300 miles to Madison and back. But everyone at the paper instantly got what I was doing, and they gave it great play. 

5. "Abandoning our kids, then and now" — Being on the night shift for seven years meant I was working when most of the staff was not, and I became expert at, for instance, rifling through the library and the morgue, where the old newspaper clippings were kept, a place most reporters seldom entered. This column came from a manilla envelope I glimpsed while flipping through the As, "ABANDONED BABIES, 1940s." How could you not look at that? And notice how it isn't just a deep dive into the past — what's the point? — but I bring it up to date, using the past to illuminate the present. Which is what it's for.

6. "Crawl across the floor to me." This column was one of those experiences that gets branded into memory, so to speak. From first hearing about this dominatrix at a family Thanksgiving dinner, and saying, "Now there's a profession you just don't see in the paper much," to standing in front of her dungeon door on Lake Street, hesitating before going in, wondering whether this would break my fragile bond of connection with readers. I decided that I wasn't doing anything I was ashamed of, and if I wrote it correctly, that would be conveyed. I later heard afterward that Lilith felt ill-used, somehow, and I'm sorry for that, as I felt I treated her openly and honestly. I did quiz her mother — an extra step I was proud to take. Maybe she was mad about that.

7. Non-Native-American Guide — Imagine having a skilled journalist and storyteller documenting your kids' lives, from birth. How great would that be? Another columnist would ignore his family completely — not newsworthy — but sharing news was never my goal. Telling a story was.  Though news had a way of creeping in. Notice how this column on my older son's participation in Indian Guide's also captures a moment when the YMCA scrapped the "Indian Guides" name. They're now called the "Adventure Guides."

8. Why restrict child porn but not guns? "The trouble with you Len," Paddy Bauler once said to Hyde Park do-gooder Leon Despres, "is that you think it's on the up-and-up." In a sense, that's my problem too — I think I'm crafting reasoned arguments for reasonable people, not throwing chunks of raw chum into a seething mass of piranha. Which is more or less what I'm doing. This was written as a calm argument about gun control based on the First and Second Amendments. The headline, which I wrote, blandly restates the premise of the piece. What I didn't realize was that a) putting the word "child porn" in your headline makes the algorithms go crazy. b) to people for whom it is impossible to even conceptualize any sort of rational restriction of guns, it's easy to invert that thought into an argument for legalizing child porn. It became one of my most ... I almost said, "read" but that overstates the case ... reacted to columns, by legions of people who never bothered to read it, or anything else, as far as I can tell. 

9. O'Neill's 'Palace of Pipe Dreams'  A newspaper column is a literary form, like Haiku, that demands certain qualities. An element of personality — I write a lot of obituaries, for instance, but they're not about me. My picture isn't generally on them Because they're not columns. A column also should be a certain length — say 500 to 1,000 words. Over the years I've managed to play with the form, now and then. I've written columns in the form of poems, or dialogues, or transcripts. This one I'm particularly proud of — it's an interview with actor Brian Dennehy, written in the form of a play that is also a parody of Eugene O'Neill. 

10. Girl X's mute testimony speaks to heart of agony: Here is another example of playing with the form — in this case, using assistant state's attorney Anita Alvarez reciting. the alphabet as a way to structure the column. If you read it, you'll notice I posted it for my anniversary joining the staff of the paper — anniversaries are big in the journalism world, a peg to hang information that otherwise might seem out-of-left field, and pointless. Which I hope this exercise in nostalgia doesn't seem. Tomorrow we got back to the daily grind of reacting to headlines, assuming they print the column I turned in. I know I've done my job when I worry they won't.

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Coping with the grief of a loved one lost to COVID

Sandra Wittman

     A black-and-white cat paused in the doorway, giving me the once-over.
     "There's Oscar," said Sandra Wittman, sitting on a bentwood rocking chair in her Carpentersville home. "When he hears a male voice, he comes. Just in case it's Norm, his daddy."
     It's not, and never will be, as Wittman outlined in an email:
     "You wrote a column about my husband, Norm Kopp, who died of Covid five years ago today. That article meant a lot to me and put a face on the more than a million Covid victims in our country. I am 82 now. It has been a difficult five years and, since we never had children, I am alone with my cat Oscar and sometimes lonely. I miss him every day. I am still living in the home we shared which is filled with memories."
     Is it ever. Art from trips to Venice and Spain. Sculptures of cats. Grief is not easily told or understood. But given how completely the 1 million victims of COVID and their millions of immediate survivors have been swept under the rug, I felt obligated to try.
     Wittman had a photo waiting on the coffee table.
     "That was our 15th anniversary of living in sin," she said. "You know, we were never married. I call him my husband. What else should I call him? 'My boyfriend?' We were 70-something years old."
     They met over 40 years ago, in a singles bar in Schaumburg.
     "He was so bright, so funny," she said. "I learned to eat Mexican. We really enhanced each other's lives. We did exciting things together. We didn't have a lot in common at the beginning. At the end, I didn't think we were joined at the hip ..."
     She paused, as if realizing anew.
     "Yeah. We were."
     Becoming unjoined was excruciating.
     "I have to tell you how he died," she said. "We were so careful, all those months. Then in December, it was announced, they were going to release the vaccine. His doctor said he would be on the list for high risk. Then the Trump administration cut the vaccine numbers to Illinois because we're a blue state. So he didn't get the vaccine."
     Instead he got COVID. From her, she believes.
     "I hurt my foot and had to go for an MRI. ... I'm pretty sure that's where I got it. There was 
horrendous guilt that I brought it home."
     They Zoomed, so he could see Oscar. "You need to come home," she said.

     Instead, Kopp got worse in mid-January.  
     "The nurse said, if he makes it through the night you can come over here and be with him when he dies. Which was a real gift, because most people didn't get to do that. I watched him die through glass. It took three minutes. I don't even remember how I got home. I was completely alone. Nobody was here."
     Alone took getting used to.
     "What are the five years like?" she mused. "I hardly remember the first two. I kept hitting my head. When you're grieving, you lose connection with your body. You're not yourself. You've lost control, and this horrible thing has happened. I was constantly banging my head on something, or falling down."

To continue reading, click here.


Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Flashback 1992: High voltage

On the west communications mast of the John Hancock Building in 1992. (Photo by Robert A. Davis)

     Wednesday is the 30th anniversary of my regular column first appearing in the Sun-Times, and I prepared a list of all-time favorite columns to post today. Looking for something to illustrate it, I came across this photo — from before I was a columnist, true, but reflecting a certain spirit. And I realized, much as I like to paint the years beforehand as being spent slumped in the corner of a late night newsroom, waiting for something to burn down, that wasn't entirely the situation. There was fun and adventure too, such as this story — which I somehow never posted before. The list can wait until Thursday.

     A hundred and thirty floors above downtown Chicago, the city is utterly quiet. No car horns, no grinding truck gears, no sirens. Only the endless howling of the wind.
     And, of course, the voices of the workmen, as they scramble over the twin communications masts of the John Hancock Building, which are receiving a rare refurbishing after years of exposure to the brutal elements.
     To hear the workmen's voices, before the wind carries their words away, you must climb up onto the masts, higher than most people care to go.
     "We don't get many visitors," says a paint-spattered Greg Teeters, coming down from a night spent on the towers.
     They work mostly at night because the television and radio antennas lining the masts have power going through them. Those antennas could cook somebody. But shutting off the power is not always easy. During ratings sweeps week, one TV station refused to cut transmission and work had to be suspended.
     The antennas are shaped strangely — a pair of interlocking, curved sausages; a batwing grill; several giant snare drums; a few clusters of boxes. Some stick out at right angles. They act like vocal cords for the wind.
     "You hear it singing," said Phil Elliot, one of the workmen on the site. "Boy, it's pretty wild."
     About two dozen workers are taking part in some aspect of the project. Most are ironworkers, familiar with working where a misstep means instant death. All say that focusing your attention on safety and work, and ignoring the height and danger, is key.
     "You don't think about it, that's the thing. You just do it," said William "Bud" Mudd. "You start thinking about it, you screw up."
     The work, which began in early August, was divided into three stages. First, the red beacons atop the masts were replaced. The 2 1/2 foot-tall aviation beacons, 1,455 feet, 6 inches above the street, had been untouched since the building was dedicated in July, 1968. They had not burned out, but 24 years of weather faded their glow and corroded their circuits.
     Next, the tops of the towers were painted, for the first time in 14 years, by workers wearing lifelines, with plastic half-gallon jugs of paint hanging off their belts. This was the phase where winds caused delays. The project was to have wrapped up about now, but will continue for several more weeks.
      The last phase of work is being done now on scaffolding at the base of the masts. The bases are more accessible than the tops, so have been painted several times. Old layers of paint are scraped off before the new can be applied.
     Here came more delay, as the scaffolding crews, unused to the height and the winds, stopped work under conditions ironworkers didn't blink at.
     For a layman setting out to climb the towers, the journey is both fearsome and incredible. The Hancock elevator makes its final stop at the 98th floor, which is jammed with pumps and wild electrical gear, such as 3,000-amp fuses the size of tomato juice cans. Their elements are packed in sand to reduce the damage when they blow up.
     A stairway to the 99th floor reveals television equipment — big steel cases, marked with network logos. Another stair leads to the 100th floor — the roof — where air-conditioner steam floats out of giant, 10-foot-wide horizontal fans, slowly turning. Atop the boxlike "penthouse," a grove of white pole antennas, faintly visible from the ground, waves like bamboo in the strong wind.
     To go further, you must climb. Hand over hand, up a ladder, about 400 feet from the roof to the top beacon. At first you are inside a roomy metal cylinder — the white solid base of the mast, as seen from the ground. Inside, it is hot, and you are surrounded by conduits and naked copper pipes.
     After about 100 feet, you clear the cylinder, exit a hatch, and are outside, surrounded by the triangular structure of the middle section of the tower. Even in summer, the metal chills your hands.
     The climb through the triangular structure seems frightening only until the final ascent: a free-climb scramble up a narrow set of metal pegs jutting out of the thin pipe that tops each mast. It is not for the faint at heart.
     "Tower people have to be a unique kind of person," says Seth Elliot, president of Communications Site Management, the company overseeing the project. "Not totally insane — if you got crazy people, you've got a problem. They need to be calm, cool and collected, but with a certain degree of bravado. It's hard to find people to do that kind of thing."

            — Originally published in the Sun-Times, Oct. 4, 1992

  

Monday, January 26, 2026

Chicago Restaurant Week, a time to enjoy good food, served well in nice places

 

     "Remind me," I told my wife, as a pair of luscious pork chops were slid under my nose at Psistaria Greek Taverna on Touhy, "Why do we go other places?"
     That moment, the only-restaurant-in-the-world flash, is a peak dining experience. You can eat food at home. But restaurants are a joy of life, each as awash with unique personality as a good stage play.
     Since Chicago Restaurant Week began Friday (and runs until Feb. 8; actually two weeks), when dining establishments across the city entice patrons with special deals, I thought I would explore what makes a restaurant shine.
     A great dining experience is a tripod, standing on three legs: food, service and atmosphere. I don't need to ponder at all to pinpoint the best meal I've eaten this past year — the grilled chicken in a garlic honey marinade with vegetables at 5 Rabanitos in Pilsen. It's such a massive plate of food, as I start in, I assume I'll take half home. But that would require me to stop eating at some point, and I always fail. The room is gorgeous, too, busy with art, reminding the National Museum of Mexican Art is a block away.
     The media loves to focus on recently opened restaurants. They're news, I suppose. But in my dotage, I prefer old favorites, though am glad when the boys, true foodies, steer us to unfamiliar places that prove worthwhile.
     We met the younger lad after work at a small Loop spot he'd found, Bereket Turkish Mediterranean Restaurant, 333 S. Franklin. An inviting room, with saffron walls. Delicious, juicy kabobs. But it was the warm service at the family-owned restaurant that really stood out.
     Something happened at dessert on our first visit I believe has never happened to me in a restaurant before. My wife and I ordered a square of flan and a chocolate baklava, to share, and the waitress brought the flan and three baklavas.
     Oh no, we protested, just the one. We just want to taste it. We tried to make her take the extra two back. That's OK, she said, they're on the house. We tried our baklava: fresh and fantastic — not too sweet. Guilt set in. I called the waitress over and insisted: we must pay for the three pieces — they were so good, we enjoyed them so much, it was a revelation.
     "No, it's impossible," she said. "The bill is already made up." We yielded; I tipped 30% and left wondering if that were enough. We returned next before a show at the Lyric — Bereket is the perfect pre-opera spot.
     Another problem with the mania for the new is that old standbys get overlooked. Every time I eat at Lou Mitchell's on Jackson, it's always crowded. But I still feel the century-old icon doesn't get enough attention. The food obviously — thick slices of Greek toast, gorgeous club sandwiches, all sorts of little free extras: donut holes, cups of ice cream. The skilled, honey-let-me-fill-that-up waitstaff. But the room — a pure, beating heart of Chicago vibe as befits a century-old restaurant, second only to Harry Caray's.
     The downside to Lou Mitchell's — and even the best restaurant has a downside — is enormous and must be emphasized: IT'S CLOSED MONDAYS AND TUESDAYS. It took me several disappointed visits, waiting in front of the locked doors to meet someone, for that to sink in. Their right, of course. Still. Tuesdays? C'mon guys, COVID's over.

To continue reading, click here.

Sunday, January 25, 2026

RIP, Jens Zorn

  

At the cemetery in Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania

     Readers sometimes mistake the obituaries that run in newspapers for the obituaries published by funeral homes. The former are news stories written by journalists summarizing the lives of notable persons for general readers.
     The latter are paid praise, usually generated with maximum emotion but little art by recently bereaved families, and of interest primarily to other loved ones and friends of the departed. (When those run in the newspaper, they're called "death notices," fine print funeral home obituaries considered paid advertising).
     Lately, grieving families fill out a form, and AI generates an obituary for them. My old college roommate Kier recently asked me to render one such effort, about his mother, into English. I was surprised — at this point I shouldn't be — by what a wordy, trite, exaggerated, godawful mess the funeral home considered acceptable. If this is the best AI can do, I'd say, time to protect your assets against the coming crash:
     "Jody's journey from her early years was marked by determination, passion, and an unwavering generosity that left an indelible impact on all those who knew her..."
     "A woman of many talents and interests... "
     "[Her] spirit will live on in the hearts of those she touched, forever remembered as a beacon of love, devotion, and warmth." 
     I cut it in half, losing lines of fluff that, being true for anyone, are true for no one, adding information I knew about her laudable life, allowing her the dignity of having "died" rather than "passed away," a euphemism that fools nobody. Death is what this is about.
     Sunday I read with interest the obituary of Jens Zorn, 94, published by the Nie Family Funeral Home of Ann Arbor, Michigan. For starters, because he was my friend Eric's father. Then because it was so well-written, by Eric I assume. Here's the first paragraph:
     "Jens C. Zorn, 94, was a physicist, an artist, a teacher, an administrator, a musician, a husband, a father and grandfather. He died at St. Joseph Hospital in the company of his son and daughter early on the morning of Jan. 5, 2026, of a cascading constellation of the maladies of age."

     A less talented writer would have said his father "filled many roles" or some such thing, but Eric just laid them out, giving the same emphasis to his professional career — "physicist" — as he did to his hobbies "musician" and his family roles — "husband" etc. Itself a triumph of balance and humanity which readers of Eric's know is his forte.
     Did that cause of death jump out at you? "A cascading constellation of the maladies of age." Now I've read thousands of obituaries, and never encountered the cause of death described  with anywhere near that kind of poetry. Cause of death is a delicate moment in an obituary. Too vague and you risk implying something dire — particularly with young people, who kill themselves and have the fact vigorously ignored — too specific and you risk marring a long, productive life with a sticky end. At 94, no cause is needed — you're old, you died — but Eric coined a beautiful phrase that is also unique. No one has written that about anyone's death before in the history of ever. I checked.
     A phrase like that keeps a reader going, hungry for more, though actually it was the parallels between Prof. Zorn and my own father's life that kept striking me. Both married in 1954 — Prof . Zorn was a year older than my dad. Both were nuclear physicists. Both were artists later in life.
     Here they departed wildly. Even more
 striking, in the more literal sense of being beaten, is that Prof. Zorn was the center of a vast network of friends and associates, and I, being genetically self-absorbed,  couldn't help but contrast that to my own father: a solitary, friendless man who basically worked by himself in a corner of NASA — I used to joke he was his own division. The paragraph that sent me sulking like Saul in his tent was this:

     "Jens was a warm, generous, curious and humble man who was in touch with friends and relatives around the world. He had lively conversations around the dining table about politics, sports, technology, art and social issues until just days before he died."  
     What would I write about my own dad, when the time comes? "Steinberg was a cold, tightfisted, hidebound and vainglorious man who kept an iron focus on himself and his own matchbox jammed with obsessions, isolated, alienating everyone he knew, starting with his brother, his children and grandchildren whom he never could even feign an interest in...."
     There was more. Prof. Zorn's sculptures are displayed across North America. My father, while feverish about his watercolors, would never lower himself by attempting to put them in a gallery, or promote them beyond haranguing whoever happened to be in front of him. 
     Envy is an ugly emotion, and I immediately shook it off. We are all dealt our cards and play them, best we can. My father's father was described to me by one of his other grandchildren as "a monster" who beat his sons. My father was a considerable improvement over that, and I like to think I'm a vast improvement over him, and am certain that my sons are such a huge improvement on their father that the only valid emotion I am permitted to have toward my lot is gratitude, gratitude and more gratitude. 
     Life might be understood backwards, but it is lived forward. I finished Jens Zorn's obituary thinking that while it is a little late for me to learn a musical instrument, it is not too late to tend to my own tattered network of friends. For starters, I reached out to Eric, asked if this post would be too intrusive, and reminded him we're overdue for lunch.


Saturday, January 24, 2026

Works in progress: Charles Berg

  
Letter (Metropolitan Museum of Art)


     I have a soft spot for folks who write letters to newspapers. Passionate, opinionated, often making excellent points, they're like amateur, shambolic, unpaid columnists. I owe my Chicago memoir to a frequent newspaper letter writer, Bill Savage, who midwifed the process.
     This is from a regular reader, Charles Berg, of Hyde Park-Kenwood, complained that the Sun-Times editorial page took a pass on it. I read what he had to say, and it made sense to me, so I asked him if I could share it on my blog. He enthusiastically agreed. Its headline is: "Trump Administration Financial Accounting."

     Most organizations – including governments – have budgets: estimates of the expenses of operation and the expected revenues needed to meet those expenses. Related to this are ongoing accountings of funds received and distributed.
     During this past year, vast sums of new incomes have been declared by the Trump administration: money from tariffs, money extorted from law firms, etc. There have also been savings by the refusal of the administration to fund programs established by Congress. Further, there have been the revocations of hundreds of millions of dollars of grants made for medical and scientific research – and threats of withholding of funds allocated to cities and states that do not comply with Trump’s edicts. And then there are the “donations” made by entities seeking to curry Trump’s favor (or forestall his ire).
     In addition, the ad hoc “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) was supposed to be cutting expenditures via elimination of “waste and fraud.” Many of their initials claims of massive savings have been disproven; their main goals were not financial – but rather the destruction of entities (like the Department of Education and international organizations) that the administration disliked. “Waste and fraud” turns out to have been nothing more than a convenient justification: NO efforts were made to identify and correct systemic problems.
     Where have the accumulated billions gone – what accounting is there? And what have these monies been used for? Clearly not for services benefitting the American public (many of those have been undercut or abolished). Clearly not to assist local law enforcement (despite the administration’s charges of lawlessness in some cities, like Chicago). Clearly not to protect our nation’s natural resources. Clearly not to promote the development of American industries. Clearly not to bring down inflation and the price increases affecting most Americans.
     How much of these funds have been used to pay for judicial assaults on Trump’s “enemies”? To pay recruitment bonuses to enlist Border Patrol and ICE agents to pursue the administration’s anti-immigration policies? To pay for their deployment to round up immigrants (seldom the “worst of the worst,” as claimed – while assaulting citizens and causing fear in the process)? To pay for Kristi Noem’s anti-immigration ads on radio and TV? To pay for legal defense against the many state and local lawsuits filed against the administration’s policies? Have some of these monies ended up in Trump’s own coffers?
     And now it has just been announced that Trump has sold $500,000,000 of seized Venezuelan oil – and put the money, not in the US Treasury, but in a bank in Qatar!! This is staring to remind me of the song in “Evita,” which includes the lyrics “When the money keeps rolling …you don't keep books … accountants only slow things down.”
      The American public should demand a fiscal accounting from the Trump administration – which, of course, will use all means possible to prevent this (denials, delays, refusals to comply with judicial orders and congressional acts, etc.).




Friday, January 23, 2026

Uptown Poetry Slam founder faces the wilderness, live onstage

Marc Kelly Smith

     Shutting up is an art form that I struggle to master. A challenge for many of us older guys, from whom nobody wants to hear anything. We've had our say.
     Several times during the only Bears games I watched this season, the last two, the camera focused in on the "GSH" on the left arms of players' jerseys, and I had to stifle the impulse to explain to my wife, "George Stanley Halas, founder of the Bears."
     Which would have inevitably led to my sharing one of my favorite bits of sports trivia: In the 1920s, when Halas took over the team and moved it from Decatur to Chicago, the practice was to name a city's pro football team after its existing baseball team. Which is how you got New York Giants in both sports. But Halas, noting that players are bigger in football than in baseball, said they're too tough to be Cubs; they're Bears. The name stuck.
     Or so the story goes.
     I didn't say any of that. She enjoyed the game and said we might consider watching this football next year, an outcome not unrelated to my efforts to maintain a manly silence.
     Halas died in in 1983. Most key formative figures in Chicago sports — William Wrigley, Charles Comiskey, Bill Wirtz — are long gone.
     But one Chicago sports pioneer still walks among us. Marc Kelly Smith founded the Uptown Poetry Slam, first at the Get Me High Lounge, then 40 years ago this July, at the Green Mill Cocktail Lounge. And if you're thinking, "Poetry is not sports," then you haven't been to the Green Mill and witnessed the slam on the third Sunday of every month.
     As someone who has watched Michael Jordan dunk a basketball, shared an outfield with Minnie Minoso at a charity softball game and watched a Cubs game from inside the scoreboard at Wrigley Field, I can assure you that the poetry slam is as peak a Chicago competitive experience as they come. Poetry is like rugby — not that popular, but plenty tough.
     Smith is appearing in a one-man show this weekend at Chicago's 50-seat Kimball Arts Center, and I phoned to ask him why, at 76, he is still talking. Why bother?
     "That's a good question," Smith said. "When the COVID pandemic hit, I thought, 'Well, OK, the run at the Green Mill, 35 years, that's a pretty good run.' Time to back off the career."
     He'd bought a house in Savanna, Illinois, "a river rat town on the Mississippi," 2½ hours west of Chicago, as a fixer-upper project.
     "I've always been a city guy," Smith said. "But I drove through the area. It was just so cheap. I came back one day and got a house to restore."
     With events drying up post-COVID, he gave up his Chicago apartment and moved there full time. The plan was to write a novel, watch the river flow and the years pass. But he succumbed to that trap snaring so many aging writers: complaining about their shrinking worlds.

To continue reading, click here.

Thursday, January 22, 2026

Thirty years a columnist


      
     You can be on the verge of success and not know it.
     "Mom called, depressed," I wrote in my Waterstone's Literary Diary on Sunday, Jan. 21, 1996. "Which is ironic, since I'm feeling pretty down too. Just tired of working hard & not getting anywhere."
     No exaggeration there. Almost nine years on the staff of the Chicago Sun-Times and still scrabbling on the lowest rung. A general assignment reporter, stuck on the night shift to keep me out of sight, which some days meant 7 p.m. to 3 a.m. I nicknamed my wife, "the gray oval" — an indistinct featureless face glimpsed in darkness. Our first son was born three months earlier, and I had taken the year-long, unpaid paternity leave permitted in the Chicago Newspaper Guild contract. Nobody did that —  I never heard of another guy taking a full year. I did so, because I had nothing to lose at the paper. And I had a book to work on, my third. That paid the bills, though even the book wasn't exactly crackling with promise either.
     "Nothing going on," I wrote the next day, a Monday. "No calls from Bill" — my editor at Doubleday —"or anybody. Went to gym & felt better." There I ran into an editor who was leaving the paper I was stuck at, Julia Wallace, off to greener fields in Atlanta. Then had coffee with John McKnight, who had just written his own book, "The Careless Society," reminding me:  books are a dime a dozen.
     Tuesday, Jan. 23, I phoned Games magazine and got an assignment. Freelance brought in both money and a sense of purpose. Phoned a Chicago magazine writer — and future food game show host — Ted Allen to "arrange lunch to discuss Chicago column." A column, anywhere, was what I wanted. Not having one, I used to say, was like being drowned. Not in a hazy abstract sense. But real, visceral. Like someone holding my face under water and killing me. I was 35 years old. Life had thundered past and was disappearing into the distance. While I was stuck at a job that involved random people yelling my name and demanding me to hurry to various addresses and figure out what's going on there, then write instantly forgettable stories about minor events. 
     And lately I wasn't even doing that, having swapped frantic insignificance for total obscurity, my life was a sleep-deprived rondo of changing soiled diapers and plugging bottles of formula into a little screaming mouth.
     We lived in the city, on Pine Grove Avenue. I went out to Great Harvest to pick up bread, When I returned, I found out I'd gotten a call from Nigel Wade, the new editor-in-chief of the Sun-Times, a great red-faced slab of New Zealand press lord, whom I'd met exactly once. The previous October, when he was still editor of the London Telegraph, but had come over to kick the tires of the paper. Most employees leap under a desk in such a situation. Reckless with ambition, I'd run to meet him,  and we went out for a drink. I gave him my latest book, "Complete & Utter Failure." 
     "Something for you to read on the plane to London," I said.
     "I called back. Nigel asked me if I would like to write a column for the Sunday paper. Astounding! He began by asking when my paternity leave was due to end."
     In my memory, the query went like this: "STEINBERG!!! This paternity leave ... how long is it supposed to last???"
     "I said, 'Nine months.' But after he offered the column, I said, 'I of course could return tomorrow.' I faxed him the NY Times piece."
     I'd been working on it for weeks, trying to sell a Chicago column to the Times. People act like success falls in your lap, but a lot of futile pushing is involved. I've spent my life jiggling the handles of locked doors.
     "Nigel sent back a note. 'This is it!'"
     Of course it wasn't "it." The next day was spent redoing the column I had written to wave under the nose of the Gray Lady, then trying something completely different. 
     "Wrote new column — first tried something on Oprah, then settled on State St. Mall. Wrote column and faxed it to the paper. Talked to Mark Jacob in the afternoon. I need to change the lede since it refers to my niece (no kids) and to make it funnier."
     The niece reference is ironic. Nigel had no children, so was puzzled about their possible appeal. My son became the one subject in my career I was formally forbidden from writing about, not that I listened. A key survival skill in journalism is knowing when to pay attention to your bosses, and when to just ignore them.
     Dealing with consequences is the difficult part of the job. Readers thunder their disapproval. Colleagues too. In the few days between when I spoke with Nigel and when the paper hit the streets, I didn't tell anybody the column was coming. To make my getting it a pleasant surprise for my colleagues? Nah, I didn't want to give anybody time to stab me in the back, to try and stop it. A smart move, as afterward another columnist, whom I considered a friend, went around telling anybody who would listen that the last thing the paper needs is another 35-year-old white guy writing a column. I forgave him, but am not sure that he ever forgave me for poaching on his personal preserve. 
     I used to say that writing the column, I do for free. It's the dealing with the consequences that demands a healthy salary.
     Not that the salary was particularly healthy, at the start. Because I was on unpaid leave, the paper paid me $250 a column. To my credit, I stayed out the rest of the year, writing from home. When I returned, I had one day a week to write the column. The other four, I was still a reporter. The column ran on Sundays — luring readers to the Sunday paper was a continual struggle for the Sun-Times, like the Russians quest for a warm water port.
     A dynamic I copied myself. My midweek column began after I convinced Nigel that if I could attract daily readers, I could shunt them toward the Sunday paper. Then in 1997, my second son was born, and I took only three months paternity leave. I thought they'd be happy, my logic being, three is much less than 12, I thought I was being considerate, but Nigel thought it was insane, and when I got back, I was made the environment reporter (writing two columns a week wasn't a full-time job either. The other three days I covered some sort of beat. For a while, I was the charities, foundations and private social services reporter).
     Covering the environment was so contrary to my nature — they wanted someone who cared about the environment, for starters, and could attend conferences and pick over reports, or who even liked being outside, none of which applied to me — that I quit on the spot, pausing only long enough to secure myself a job as features editor at Chicago Magazine.
     But the paper didn't let me go. Goodies were assembled: I would be given a third column and three days to write them, which could be spent at home. And the paper would promote me. And a raise. 
     Why am I recounting all this? Nostalgia, I suppose. Five years ago, when I hit 25 years as a columnist, I merely reprinted that first column here, and did not mention the anniversary in the paper. Because heads were rolling. I decided to keep a low profile, and not leap up crying "Here I am; fire me!"  Nor do I plan on remarking on the three decades in the paper because ... well, a lot is going on, dire doings at home and abroad, and there's enough self-indulgence in the world without my adding to it.
     But I do have to fill today somehow.  I figure, 30 years on, a person can pause to reflect. Heck, I might do something on the day itself, Jan. 28 — list 10 favorite columns maybe. Or might not. That sort of choice — being your own man, making your own calls — is the essence of column writing. They give you a regular hole to fill as you please. How you fill it is your affair. That's a great responsibility. And a joy. I've got nothing to regret. It was a good way to make a living, for many years, and still is, most days. The journey is nearly done, the coastline in sight, the safe harbor just around the bend. But not yet.
    Ten years ago, I also paused to reflect on this job. Cultivating gratitude, I thanked 14 colleagues on staff who made life at the paper enjoyable  for me. Of those 14, two remain.

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

President Trump's tantrum is no reason to invade Greenland


     He took it.
     Give Donald Trump credit. Truly a wonder. A continual marvel of what human beings are capable of doing: the Great Pyramid of Giza, Hoover Dam, and Donald J. Trump.
     I'm serious. Despite decades of his toddler pettiness being ground in our faces, daily if not hourly, the man still manages to surprise. How can that be? Maybe because we cling to our traditional values, and confronted with someone who is an utter moral void, untouched by conscience, self-awareness or humility, the mind just rebels and insists on assigning him a notional decency he actually doesn't possess. We rush to cover the naked madman with a blanket.
   Last week, Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader, gave the U.S. president her Nobel Peace Prize, the latest in a series of blatant buy-offs attempting to curry favor. The Swiss delivered a gold brick. Qatar gifted a plane. Machado handed over her Nobel.
    And he took it. The irony of a man who thunders against DEI as undercutting achievement through merit, then turning around and accepting a prize earned by a Latina, hardly needs to be pointed out.
     Maybe my mind boggles extra hard at this because I'm so averse to awards. Sour grapes, perhaps, since I seldom win one. But unlike the president, I don't go out of my way trying to win them either. I have never, for instance, applied for the highest award in journalism, the Pulitzer Prize, because A) applying seems a waste of time; B) I know how political the award process is, being familiar with Tribune panjandrums on the awards committee and C) I am too busy writing stuff.
     Not that I wouldn't take one. From the Pulitzer Prize Board at Columbia University. Not from any random past winner. Though it's fun to imagine a scenario similar to what played out last week in the surreal farce called Washington, D.C.
     "Hey buddy," Mark Konkol says, over the phone. "You know, I was reading another one of your hard-hitting columns and was struck, yet again, by how unfair it is that I was given the Pulitzer Prize while your high-caliber professional journalism is somehow always overlooked. So I'm going to hop on my motorcycle and blast up to Northbrook and give you mine, along with my heartiest congratulations."
     That would horrify me. I would beg Mark not to do it.
     Honors can curse as well as uplift. They're a monkey's paw. Even legitimately won prizes. I wasn't the paper's charities, foundations and private social services reporter for long, but managed to write a story on how the MacArthur Foundation's "genius" grants ruin people's lives. Recipients kill themselves, get divorced, have breakdowns, stop creating whatever it is that snagged the award in the first place. Not all winners, obviously. But enough for a story.
     The MacArthur Foundation didn't send out a press release tipping me off to this. I just knew it had to be so, and went looking. Because every rose comes with thorns. With honor, mitigation. In 2009, Barack Obama was abashed, almost horrified, when nine months into his first term he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He said he didn't deserve it. He was right.

To continue reading, click here.

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

One down, three to go.

    
Photo by Ashlee Rezin

     “And once the storm is over, you won’t remember how you made it through, how you managed to survive. You won’t even be sure, whether the storm is really over. But one thing is certain. When you come out of the storm, you won’t be the same person who walked in. That’s what this storm’s all about.”
                                                                  ― Haruki Murakami
    January 20. Whew. The optimist in me wants to point to one year, done and gone, as of today. The first year of Trump 2.0 in the bag! Yippee! We made it through. We're still here, sorta.
     Are we? Not everybody, of course. Renee Good is no longer here. Plus hundreds of thousands of people who were living among us, neighbors and colleagues and employees, bosses and friends and relatives, working, raising families, snatched off the street by masked men, dispatched to unknown fates outside the purview of law. No celebration for them. Or their loved ones. Or anybody who cares about things such as the Constitution. And the dignity of human beings. And decency.
     One year ago, he signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America" — that sweet spot of arbitrariness, insularity, isolationism and nationalism where he would dwell — and was off to the race. Two hundred and 24 executive orders followed, more than his entire first term. And the other two branches of government fell in line without a murmur. It's hard to grasp what happened last week, never mind tally the toll for the first year.
     Besides, even if we came off the first year, unscarred, or not all that scarred anyway, there are three more to go. How many children will die due to our secretary of health's delusional policies? A hundred? A thousand? More? 
     Based on the damage being done, the standards eroded, the precedents set, the reputation soiled, even then, even if there is an election, and someone not committed to imposing a cult of personality fascist state wins, the foundation is cracked, the rot exposed. Not to forget the growing legion of imitators, with their red ties, their collagen puffed lips. Many will weather vane into whatever new wind blows. But others will persevere, following their master, even when absent. It worked for him...
      The rich, always powerful, consolidated their stranglehold on our society, aided by the omnipresent social media that gave them their wealth. Government, once a counterbalance, became a hand maiden. That will not be easily undone. Elon Musk has all your most sensitive data on a hard drive.
      We will never be free of this. I am certain of that. We are changed or — to be negative — our true national self is revealed, undeniable. We can't be free, because we weren't before — as I've said many times before, Donald Trump is a symptom, not a cause, and his nationalism and malice, prejudice and self-regard, stupidity and violence were all there before, giving us the Vietnam War. Jim Crow. McCarthyism and the Red Scare. The internment of citizens of Japanese ancestry. The war against labor. Racism and sexism, cruelty, greed and indifference. Once you start looking for bad stuff in the American past, there's a lot waiting. Donald Trump didn't plant it; he harvested it.
     That isn't defeatism. The starry eyed look toward some transformative miracle, that will make everything right, justice and decency showing up at the last moment, like the officer in white at the end of "Lord of the Flies." That is a recipe for failure, and disappointment. No bucket of water is going to melt the Wicked Witch and inspire the castle guard to take a knee and all hail Dorothy. Only in the movies. In real life, the guards see their mistress melted, and hack Dorothy apart in a fury.
     If there is one — and I'm reluctant to use the word — lesson in all this, it is that there is a darkness and a hardness and a meanness in all people, just waiting for the right pied piper to play the right tune and draw it out. That was true before the arrival of the current administration. And it will be true long after it is gone, replaced by ... God knows what. How can good hope to prevail if it doesn't even recognize the game being played?
     That is not a recipe for surrender. There is also goodness and fairness and decency. We see that too. Americans did not look away when their neighbors were being hauled off. They did not cringe. They stood up, some of them, and fought the fight that has always be fought. Chicago repulsed the slave catchers in the 1850s and did no less now. It was a centuries-long struggle to arrive to the state that our current leader has ripped apart so easily. We rose up before, from worse. We can rise up again. But don't kid yourself. It won't be easy. It wasn't before, this struggle that started 10,000 years ago and never ends, never can end. 
     Not a truth that makes anybody feel good but, another lesson many Americans can't seem to stomach: the truth doesn't exist to make you feel good.



Monday, January 19, 2026

It was also against the law for a Black person to sit at a Woolworth's lunch counter

 


     In a time of madness, people lose sight of the basics. So it is worthwhile to review the facts.
     For instance.
     Monday is Martin Luther King Jr. Day. A day when our nation — well, some of us anyway — honors the slain leader. I will fly the flag, as befits a patriotic holiday. Put my hand over my heart, say the Pledge of Allegiance and feel good about our country.
     How can I? With so much bad going on?
     Let me explain, as simply as possible.
     Who was Dr. King? He was a civil rights leader. And what is civil rights? It was — is — the process where people who are excluded from guaranteed American rights struggle peacefully to gain access to those rights.
     People such as?
     Black people, for starters. For about 200 years, Blacks were kept as slaves. And what had Black people done to deserve slavery? The answer is hidden in the question. Their skin was darker than those who enslaved them. Lighter-skinned people somehow considered themselves better, based on nothing. Nobody says, "I have a great accountant; his skin is very light." Nevertheless, they'd hire the white applicant over the Black, for that very reason. It wasn't written down. You just did it.
     Though there were laws written down, designed to deny the humanity of Black people and so facilitate their oppression. When Black people, inspired by Dr. King, tried to rise up and enjoy the freedoms guaranteed as American citizens, they often broke the law.
     The year I was born, a University of Illinois student named Jesse Jackson couldn't find a book he needed in the shabby and inadequate one-room McBee Avenue Colored Branch of the Greenville Public Library in Greenville, South Carolina. So he went downtown to the main branch to look for the book — on patriotism, ironically — and was met by the police, and turned away. Instead of accepting this humiliation, he returned with friends and was arrested.
     "Groups of Negroes have invaded the quiet of the public library," the News and Courier reported.
     Tradition, backed by law, kept a Black teenager from checking out a book. On Martin Luther King Jr. Day in 2026, we ought to remember how unjust laws, brutally enforced, facilitate oppression. The Holocaust was legal. The Nazis kept meticulous records, never imagining humanity would return. Slavery was legal. A Black person eating at a Woolworth's lunch counter in 1960 was not.
     Now our government is acting as if stories like that somehow hurt white people. Biographies of Black heroes are whitewashed from military websites. The idea that we should live in a country where Black people can go to college is being criminalized. Colleges are being shaken down for money by the government for the crime of trying to create diverse campuses.
     Anyone who ever took a college tour knows how admissions work. There are academic standards, sure. But universities also let in a football team of students based on athletic prowess. And if the school band needs a trombonist, then a few trombonists are admitted. Plus someone from Alaska, so they can brag about having students from all 50 states. To suggest that also wanting a diverse campus that reflects our nation is somehow out of bounds is absurd.
     Then again, this is an absurd time. The harassment of dark-skinned Americans on the streets of Democratic-run cities — Los Angeles and Chicago last year, now Minneapolis — is absurd. Again, laws are invoked. Immigration violations — misdemeanors, paperwork issues — become enormous crimes that justify widespread brutality, the way the crucifixion of Christ was used to rationalize a millennium of killing Jews. Renee Good was a woman whose crime was sitting in a car that began to roll. She was shot in the face and the government denounced her as a terrorist, then went after her widow. It's cruel.

To continue reading, click here.





Sunday, January 18, 2026

Flashback 1999: On the allure of `Xena'

 Xena, played by Lucy Lawless, left, shared adventures in a vague heroic past with her particular friend, Gabrielle, played by Renee O'Connor (Photo: ©Universal Television / Everett Collection)

     Rick Garcia, a key figure in the Chicago gay community, died last week. I've known him for decades — he's the reason my memoir, "You Were Never in Chicago," ends at the Chicago Gay Pride Parade: he invited me to ride on the float for his new organization, Civil Rights Agenda. Riding a float in the pride parade on a fine day in June is one of those peak Chicago experiences that you are lucky to do once in your life, like reciting at the Uptown Poetry Slam or watching a Cubs game from inside the scoreboard at Wrigley Field, or climbing one of the television masts on the John Hancock Building, or going down the Deep Tunnel. 
     I spoke to Rick a few times over the summer. Like many, he was having a hard time after the death of Lori Cannon. I tried to help, but wish I'd done more. Rick was a big-hearted man, but even the largest of hearts can break, and give out from overuse.
     My colleague Mitch Dudek wrote a fine obituary for Rick, explaining how nuns helped crack calcified resistance against gay rights by Catholic aldermen. He also said how he "became the first person many news reporters would call for a quote on gay issues." I can vouch for that. Back in the 1990s, Rick served as a kind of Gay Everyman. He shows up in a number of columns of mine — this is from when the column appeared Sundays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, the latter two days being briefer, lighter efforts in the feature section. While the unapologetic male gaze in this might cause trouble today, we didn't think anything of it 26 years ago, and I believe I can repost it without getting in hot water. Besides, right about now people might appreciate reading a cheery trifle. I know I did. 

     Ever since "Northern Exposure" went off the air, I don't watch TV regularly anymore.
     Except when cleaning the kitchen. You need something to distract from the slop and the grind. This is easy in the evening, when you can count on something newsy.
     Weekends are different. Nothing's on. The choices are "Xena: Warrior Princess," auto racing or golf (who watches that? Anybody? I don't believe it. A whole round?).
     Of course I settle for "Xena." Not for the plots: tepid Dungeons & Dragons-type myth run through a food processor of squishy 1990s morality. But if you're going to look up from scouring the sink and see something, you might as well see a few heaving bosoms and battling babes.
     I have accidentally enamored our 3-year-old son with "Xena." Now it's his favorite show. I probably should be concerned because of the fighting. But I find it sweet.
     "Hey, your girlfriend Xena's on," I said Sunday afternoon, and he scampered upstairs. Wearying of the kitchen, I joined him, and the family, all camped out in front of "Xena."
     I must never have really paid attention to the show before, while cleaning, other than ogle whoever was on screen (it's like one of those Russ Meyer women's prison movies, but set in ancient times).
     About two minutes' worth of watching were enough to establish the, ummm, intense relationship between the Xena character and her petite blond sidekick, Gabrielle.
     "This makes `Ellen' seem like `Bonanza,'" I said to my wife.
     That raised a question.
     "It's huge among lesbians," said gay activist Rick Garcia. "I've only seen it a couple times, but that's all you need to catch the extremely heavy lesbian overtones. They talk about feelings. They're in tune to one another. It's almost a cliche."
     Rick put me in touch with a friend, who explained the appeal.
     "First of all, it's just a very feminist show," said Alicia Obando,* 35, a lesbian who is a legislative aide for Cook County Board Commissioner Mike Quigley. "She is a very strong person, physically, mentally, emotionally."
     I asked her if she thought the overtones were accidental, imposed on an innocent adventure show, or intentional.
     "They supposedly do it on purpose," said Obando. "She knows she has a strong lesbian following."
      Lucy Lawless, the New Zealand-born actress playing Xena, has admitted as much.
     "We are aware, and we're not afraid of it," she told a Scottish newspaper. "This is a love story between two people. What they do in their own time is none of our business."
     North Sider Melissa Stanley, 28, who dressed up as Xena for two of the past three Halloweens, pointed out that the implied relationship appeals to more than simply lesbians.
     "I'm not sure if it's for the women viewers or the men," she said.
     I wondered how, considering the big hoo-haw that erupted over "Ellen" two years ago, that "Xena," the most popular syndicated show on TV, could craft itself into a lesbian fantasy epic without public tumult. Stanley had an intriguing theory.
     "For one thing, they never made a political agenda out of it, like `Ellen' did," she said, pointing out that Ellen DeGeneres really is a lesbian, while Lawless merely plays one, maybe. "I think people have a better time with straight people playing gays than with gays playing gays."
     Now why would that be?
        — Originally published in the Sun-Times, April 13, 1999

* She would go on to become Ald. Tom Tunney's chief of staff in 2003, serving for almost five years.