Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Barbie: You always hurt the ones you love

     Saturday we revisited comforting the Ken doll on his 50th birthday. So it seems somehow fitting to pivot to Barbie, and I happen to have this article Forbes assigned me in 2009 on Barbie mutilation, part of a Barbie 50th birthday package. Approaching a story such as this requires a plan: should I quiz female friends? Present myself at playgrounds and try to talk to girls? That seemed a bad idea. I scoured academic websites and posted a request on Facebook, and was surprised at women lining up to tell me about cutting up their Barbies. An early lesson in Facebook's value as a widely-flung net.

     A young girl bakes her Barbie doll in the oven. A San Francisco bar invites patrons to have at the dolls with knives. A New York artist drives nails into Barbie, calling it sculpture.  

     What's going on here? How did Barbie, history's most popular doll, celebrating her 50th year as a beloved plaything for girls worldwide, become an object that females of all ages cut, burn, bend, spindle and mutilate? And what does it all mean?
     Let's start with girls. Barbie is, after all, supposed to be a toy. In 2005, researchers at England's University of Bath, conducting a study of how children play, were surprised at what girls do to their Barbies.
     "The types of mutilation are varied and creative, and range from removing the hair to decapitation, burning, breaking and even microwaving," writes Dr. Agnes Nairn. "The girls we spoke to see Barbie torture as a legitimate play activity, and see the torture as a 'cool' activity in contrast to other forms of play with the doll."
     The study's conclusion--that the abuse means that Barbie is a "hate figure" among 7- to 11-year-old girls--sparked debate all over the world.
     Some felt that Barbie was merely getting her due as a poor role model; others argued that battering a Barbie is no different than, say, battering a red wagon--only with a cultural touchstone like Barbie, we notice.
     The study's conclusions "smack of academic overanalysis," Anastasia de Waal wrote in The Guardian, "of grown-ups getting too excited about the symbolism of child's play. ... Testing the versatility and robustness of one's toys is neither new nor sinister."
     While the study emphasized the hostility suggested by hacking something apart, the girls actually told researchers they didn't despise Barbie so much as feel they had outgrown her.
     "The most readily expressed reason for rejecting Barbie was that she was babyish and girls saw her as representing their younger childhood out of which they felt they had now grown," said Nairn.

To continue reading, click here.


  1. I never heard of mutilating Barbie Dolls. After some searching, it seems to be a popular pastime.

    1. Without EGD I would be hopelessly ignorant.


    2. Look at it this way -- tattoos and piercings are forms of self-mutilation. Nobody should be surprised by doll mutilation. Concerned, maybe.

    3. Any statistics on how many siblings "punish" their sister's Barbie dolls to get even for "squealing" on them? I did that when I was twelve. Luckily, my father found the doll before my 8-year-old sister did, or she might have been really traumatized. I wasn't as fortunate...and got a good whupping. Today, I would probably face a psychological evaluation by a battery of court-appointed shrinks. It was a kinder and gentler era. Better to face the music from a belt.

      The victim was an "Original Barbie" from 1959, in the zebra-striped outfit. Big Brother most likely ruined its resale value and collectability.

    4. Tony, one man's mutilation is another (wo)man's artistic self-expression, or simple decoratve choice. But just to be clear, I never mutilated Barbie. I thought she was boring.

    5. We're both right, Coey. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

  2. Mutilation is a strong word. Girls reversing Barbie’s arms likely want to see how the doll works. Changing heads is merely changing the look of the doll. Clipping the hair provides a new hairdo, but young girls couldn’t possibly have done a good job — the results may have looked like mutilation. I’d say over analysis is a good assessment.


Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.