Monday, June 3, 2019

Police forced to show courage legislators lack

     Virginia Beach is, to be honest, kind of a dump.
     “A tourist trap” is how I’ve described this unlovely coastal jumble of blockish ocean-facing hotels and pool-heavy motels, neon T-shirt and bicycle surrey rental stands, joints selling fried oysters and fish chowder, cramped stores hawking novelty shot glasses and Virginia is for Lovers beer cozies.
     We only visited because we were looking at southern colleges for the younger boy, and the grumpy dad doing all the driving insisted that he’d be damned if he was going to travel all the way from Chicago to the University of Richmond — lovely campus, great business school, they trust their kids with chunks of the endowment to invest, and the best mascot ever, the Spiders — without pushing 100 more miles and sticking his toes in the ocean for a few days.
     All things being equal, better to swim at Michigan City and save yourself a drive.
     There is, however, on the crowded and over-developed Virginia Beach boardwalk, a curious statue showing three figures, obscured up to their hips by a marble base, each with one hand interlocked, the other reaching down, as if offering passersby below a helping hand.
     It is the Virginia Beach Law Enforcement Officers Memorial. Dedicated in 2012, it’s inscribed with 14 names of local officers who died in the line of duty. The bronze larger-than-life figures represent the police, the sheriff’s office and federal agencies.
     I thought of the statue after what Virginia Beach police chief Jim Cervera called a “horrific event of unbelievable proportion” occurred Friday afternoon: a dozen people murdered at the Virginia Beach Municipal Center. Shot dead for ... well, whatever unknowable blend of petty grievance and flaring psychosis (and, never forget, easy access to automatic weaponry) causes a person to do such a thing.

To continue reading, click here.


  1. I almost skipped over the description of the University of Richmond as having a "...great business school, they trust their kids with chunks of the endowment to invest..." Seems like a real gutsy and appealing teaching strategy. Though I suppose the wins and losses cancel each other and the end result is that the endowment makes the same modest gains (or losses) that they would if they put it all their dough in a Vanguard account.


  2. One of the many, many things I can't stand about Trump is how, every time there's a mass shooting, he tweets about the "wonderful, fantastic" job done by the "first responders." It strikes a cheery, optimistic note that's even more annoying than "thoughts and prayers." This reached a peak after the Stoneman Douglas High School slaughter, where he posed with hospital personnel, grinning and giving a thumbs-up sign. I miss having a president who knew the difference between a massacre and a football game.

  3. I've been researching websites in an attempt to formulate a cognitive comment on this topic. I can no longer find useful information like good arguments supporting reasonable gun laws that used to exist on the NRA site. It is difficult to search because they have multiple domain names interlinking pages in a random fashion. What is visible consists primarily of hard core no regulation needed statements. In my opinion the NRA no longer serves the interests of their members. The legislation coming out of Springfield, like fingerprinting and raising the price of an Illinois FOID card by 1000%, will not end gun violence, just motivate people to arm themselves while they still can. In a more interesting note here is a thoughtful analysis of Presser v. The State of Illinois, by Mimi Cowan.


Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.