Wednesday, May 21, 2025

NYC statue shows our limitations

"Grounded in the Stars," by Thomas J. Price (Photo courtesy of Times Square Alliance)

     At lunchtime Monday I walked a Rocky Patel cigar from the Iwan Ries cigar shop on Wabash to Gibsons on Rush, pausing to smile at the Irving Kupcinet statue south of Trump Tower.
     I knew Kup. He enjoyed a good cigar, and I considered walking over and blowing a puff in his direction, as a benediction. But time was short, so I kept going, wishing, once again, that his left hand, currently extended in a sort of "I give you the city" wave, could somehow be rearranged into a gesture more fitting to the namesake of the building that replaced his newspaper home.
     The Kup statue did not cause a lot of controversy, which is a shame because the Sun-Times columnist liked nothing more than to stir the pot. He loved to call out racists, and sprang out of the blocks early — in the 1940s he would catalog the snubs suffered by Black soldiers and entertainers, and scolded the Chicago Bar Association for refusing membership to Blacks, claiming to be a social club and not a professional organization. Kup pointed out that social club dues are not tax-deductible. Suddenly the CBA saw the light.
     He'd have a field day with the outcry after "Grounded in the Stars," the realistic statue of a 12-foot tall Black woman unveiled in Times Square April 29. The New York Times called the reaction a "roiling debate," though it's really part of the frenzied purge of Black people from American institutions, government and history. The howl of hurt over the statue, the work of London sculptor Thomas J. Price, is not a discussion, but the typical self-own that racists do when confronted with people unlike themselves doing otherwise ordinary activities — riding a bus, sitting a lunch counter, being represented as a statue — while in the process of being Black.
     “This is what they want us to aspire to be?” the Times quoted Jesse Watters, a Fox News host, gasping. “If you work hard you can be overweight and anonymous?” He called it, “a DEI statue."
The overweight crack is unjustified — I'd say she's of standard heft found in most people in this country and looks like she could snap Jesse Watters like a breadstick.
     As for anonymous, honoring symbolic women is something this country excels at, from the 19-foot "Statue of Freedom" atop the Capitol building that Watters' pals recently got off the hook for invading and defiling on Jan. 6, 2021, to a certain large gal in a spiked hat standing at the entrance of New York Harbor, given to the United States by France back in the day when we were smart enough to welcome people who want to be Americans.
     Chicago is peppered with statues of imaginary women, from the golden "Statue of the Republic" in Hyde Park to the way cool art deco Ceres atop the Board of Trade.
     The city has an anonymous woman at its heart — the Picasso sculpture at Daley Plaza — a woman's head, rendered in the same COR-TEN steel as the building behind it. Yes, when it was unveiled in 1967, Chicagoans boggled. Confronted with the female face Picasso had been drawing and painting for half a century, they saw everything from a praying mantis to a baboon.
     But that's par for the course. Bigotry makes people see what isn't there. David Marcus, a Fox News digital columnist, looked at the placid visage of "Grounded in the Stars" and saw "an angry Black lady." I'd call her expression somewhere between serene and bored.

To continue reading, click here.

Irv Kupcinet, by Preston Jackson



16 comments:

  1. The Statue of the Republic is without a doubt, one of the ugliest statues ever made!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Dude: Yeah, well, that's just your opinion, man.

      Delete
  2. I find the Jack Brickhouse statue to be slap-dash and creepy. If we absolutely needed a statue of Jack Brickhouse perhaps they should have taken another pass using all of him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My favorite is Harry Carry rising out of the depths of hell.

      Delete
  3. It's amazing how much performative outrage the right can gin up over stuff like this. I'm surprised they haven't all died of apoplexy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i think we let it happen too much. They need to be called out on their bs.

      Delete
  4. I imagine the pigeons like it.

    john

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't do a damn thing for me, but maybe the pigeons like it.
      And maybe some New Yorkers don't. Not a BFD, either way.
      It will only be available for crapping on until June 17th.
      Four more weeks. The blink of an eye. Deal with it.

      Delete
  5. As we were reminded by you yesterday, Niel; art is a very important aspect of our existence. The comments only confirmed your points. From agreement on being "tricked" into seeing other artists, to the confusion at the concept of kitsch, talent, and meaning.

    Though i will say, too many statues that look exactly like people don't work. More art is good, but too much of the same is bad. I mean, look at how crappy Lincoln park has become because all of the buildings look identical... and boring.

    I do see something much more important (and sinister) hiding between the lines of your post. And that is the problem of platforms, awareness, lies, hate, and propaganda. Fox News sets the agenda. It has never set it correctly, fairly, honestly, or in the interest of News. For some reason, all we care about is following their lead; and no one pushes back in their faces and calls their bluffs.

    Furthermore, the "liberal" media isn't that liberal and tries to hard to cater to "both sides." This just results in poor reporting, skewing figures, and sane washing the truth. It only justifies the rights unjustifiable actions. It allows their double talk. it holds democrats accountable but not republicans.

    It is infuriating.

    Kup was great because he knew what was right, and he said it. I may not have agreed with everything he said, but he said it well and there was an open and fair dialog about it. Such a thing does not exist at all today, at least not from the right.

    And lastly, the rights assault on DEI makes me sick. Especially given every single republican is essentially a DEI hire. They are white, unqualified, lying, cheating, lazy, self serving, fools who could not get a real job without the assistance of a diversity, equity, and inclusion effort.

    It's clear to me that the main reason whites and the right hate DEI is because it shows them how completely unqualified they are for even the most basic of roles. They are the welfare queens they complained about, with their billion dollar contracts and lives and residences out of the states they represent.

    As a society we need to destroy the partisan plague that is news media and return to a time before the fairness doctrine was ended. It would be great if news organizations made money, but they should report the news not make and promote it. It's the same reason insurance companies are a cancer on society right now. How can you make money off of an idea like insurance? You shouldn't, it should keep costs down and fair. But the moment you find out you can make money, you stop doing what you were designed to do, and pivot to a capitalistic mindset.

    Its time we fight the fascists.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course, people think she's angry. She's not smiling and people (mostly men) cannot stand a woman not smiling.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Calm down Watters! There's ar eal lot of hard working anonymous women. Should they aspire to be smug white men whining away?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Once upon a time, I believed racial prejudice in the U.S. would eventually disappear, but I'm beginning to doubt that it ever will. It will just "shape-shift" into abandonment of Affirmative Action programs or opposition to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, programs or hysteria over a statue in Times Square, or etc., etc., etc.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Given the previous comments, I hardly know where to begin. So I'll go back to Neil's original premise and add a few comments based on my own experience as an artist.

    First, a marvelous Chicago photographer, Patty Carroll, has created a decades long series on the theme of the "Anonymous Woman" in which she juxtaposes faceless female forms against backdrops and paraphernalia that bury the female figure in patterns of drapery and ephemeral flotsam. Until recently, women have been secondary creatures relegated to subservience when compared to their male counterparts. Like Ms. Carroll, the sculpture "Grounded in the Stars" addresses two issues: sexism and race.

    Second, I had no idea that Preston Jackson, a prominent Black artist, was the creator of the Irv Cupcinet sculpture. Preston was a personal friend of my cousin when they grew up together in Decatur, IL. Preston is an accomplished sculptor and painter who began teaching at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago in 1989. I met him a few years ago and would never have guessed that as an expressionist artist he would have been able to design a portrait so iconic and representational.

    Third, the previous criticism of the "Statue of the Republic" by Daniel Chester French ignores the fact that it was originally created as the centerpiece of the 1893 Columbian Exposition. Like it or not, it was in keeping with the times and stands as a monument to that significant slice of our Chicago history. It, like much public sculpture, isn't there to please Mr. Clark St, but to celebrate our history. D. C. French also created the sculpture that adorns the Lincoln Memorial in Washington. I suppose some self-appointed critics also find it ugly. I feel sorry for them.

    Lastly, I want to thank Neil for finally recognizing that the Chicago Picasso is the head of a woman. If anyone doubts it, all they have to do is examine Picasso's work. Art history is no mystery. For anyone who wants to act as a critic, please, first do your homework.

    ReplyDelete
  10. years ago when I was director at the Lake Forest Library, we received a gift from a resident for a local artist to design and install a sculpture. The family had chosen a local artist to do the design and installation; they approved it as did the Board.. When it was installed it created some controversy. One of our staff, an artist herself, told me to answer those who came to me to complain, "contemporary artist can be challenging". With the implication that "you are too dumb to get it". I used that response many times. Could be the same with this piece of art.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Watters is a POS, as are prob all folks at Faux news.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.