Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Bear down, Arlington Heights Bears!


     In my post about going back-and-forth with CNN, I quote myself saying this, as a preface to explaining why the city needs every warm body it can get:
     "Chicago had 3 million residents in 1950. Now we have 2.7 million residents."
     I wasn't thinking, or, rather, thought I was writing to somebody in Atlanta. But my writing about it expanded the audience. Slapdown came quickly, from a reader named Nate.
     "'Chicago had 3 million residents in 1950. Now we have 2.7 million,'" he wrote, quoting me. "And you're one of the ones that left. Taking the 'we' out of it."
     Ouch. True enough. I try to admit when I'm caught in a deception.
     "I generally try not to include myself among Chicagoans — stolen valor — but sometimes I mess up," I replied. "I'll correct."
     And I did, changing it to "Now Chicago has 2.7 million residents."
     Only then I realized I hadn't written that for the post, but was quoting something that I had already written to CNN. So I changed it back — as a value, quoting accurately, even quoting myself, surpasses not being caught putting on airs.
Designed by ChatGPT
    Which came to mind Monday when the Bears announced they're really, truly moving to Arlington Heights. No foolin' around this time. 
     “Moving outside of the city of Chicago is not a decision we reached easily,” Bears president and CEO Kevin Warren wrote in a letter to season ticket holders. “This project does not represent us leaving, it represents us expanding.”
     Expanding ... into Arlington Heights. While indeed leaving Chicago, in the sense they won't play there anymore. But they still won't be the Arlington Heights Bears, correct? The name "Chicago" they intend to keep, apparently.
    Allow me to savor this moment.
    As someone who has had my chops busted for 25 years for not living in the city, I'm not sure how to feel about this apparent development. Is this helpful to my cause? With this move, I've got the Chicago Bears behind me, arms folded across their chests, hands tucked in armpits, nodding in agreement. I can reply: "It's good enough for the Chicago Bears, it's good enough for me, so shut the fuck up!"
     Or is it just harmful to them without necessarily benefiting us scorned suburbanites? Chicagoans love lording their residency over those whose pillows rest over the city limits. If the Bears go on some White Sox-like swoon, will the general weakness and inauthenticity of the suburbs be blamed? 
     Bank on it.
     Unless it doesn't. The New York Giants play in East Rutherford, New Jersey. I almost said, "And nobody holds that against them." Honestly, I'm not that well versed in New York Giants fandom. Maybe their fans howl location-based derision from the stands. Maybe they wave signs, "You made me schlep to East Rutherford for THIS?!?!?!"
    Or maybe, because the Giants went to the Super Bowl five times and won four, they could play at the American Girl store in Montclair and that would be okay with fans.
     I shouldn't dip my toe too far into sports — I couldn't name a current Bears player if you put a gun to my head. But next time someone gives me grief about living in Northbrook, I can say, "Hey, at least I sometimes work in Chicago. That's more than" — whoever the quarterback of the Bears might be — "can say." 
     Which means I'll have to learn a player's name. Someday. 

37 comments:

  1. I don't care where the Bears play as long as zero tax money is involved in building their overblown & overpriced stadium!
    And that includes the state preventing them from getting a law passed allowing them to not pay the full tax rate of Arlington Heights!
    Plus they also need to pay off the remaining bonds on Soldier Field, as the crooked McCaskeys are the ones who demanded it be rebuilt as the Toilet Bowl!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could be worse, dude. You could be living in Cleveland.

      Moved here 33 years ago, at age 45, to marry my college sweetheart. Found out early on that the Browns were like a religion here. This is Browns Town. They played in historic old Cleveland Stadium, on the lakefront, which seated 80,000 for football games.

      That is, they played there until their greedy shmuck of an owner moved them to Baltimore, where they have been enormously successful for almost thirty years, and became big winners in the NFL. The city of Cleveland bitched loudly and long, and threatened legal action. Bitched enough to be awarded an expansion team, with the same name and colors.

      The old stadium was torn down and a new one was slapped together on the same spot. And it immediately began falling apart. So did the new team. They have been a laughingstock, and the joke of the NFL, for a quarter-century now. Stink is too good a word for them. Worse than the hapless Cubs have ever been.

      So now their current billionaire owner, a corrupt and dishonest carpetbagger from Tennessee, wants to move the team out of their crumbling dump when their lease expires in a few more years. He bought a huge chunk of land, the former site of a now-demolished auto plant, in an inner-ring suburb. He envisions a multi-billion-dollar Dizzyland on that spot. The usual bells and whistles: a domed stadium, retail, apartments, concert halls, yadda yadda yadda. The whole megillah.

      A sports-themed and owner-operated mini-city, like the Braves built twenty miles from Atlanta. On the taxpayers' dime. The Ohio legislature already gifted him with half-a-billion. The rest is supposed to be funded by Joe and Jane Shmoe, who don't want this boondoggle, and who can't afford the tickets anyway. Or the team-controlled parking lots. Or the cost of tailgating in a team-owned space. And all this mishegoss would be ruining nearby neighborhoods on game days and concert days. One of which would be mine.

      But there has been pushback from the city. Oh, and did I mention that the land is adjacent to the AIRPORT? Imagine trying to catch a plane on the Sunday after Thanksgiving, when a game is scheduled. Or before Christmas. Or on any given Sunday. Or on a weekend when Taylor Swift shows up to sing. The FAA says a dome would interfere with air traffic. The highway people say Dizzyland would mess up ground transportation. A rapid transit station would still mean a mile-long walk. But what billionaires want, billionaires usually get.

      Be happy you are not living in Cleveland. For so many reasons. Am I pissed off about all this? Damn betcha. Maybe I won't live long enough to experience this nightmare scenario. Really, really hate the Browns now. Go Lions.

      Delete
  2. NFC North fan, daughter of an avid Bears fan. Born in Chicago, raised in the boonies (McHenry County), moved to the suburbs in 1972. Worked in both city and burbs. Still visit our beautiful city often. (Just because I don't live there doesn't mean it's not mine.) A Super Bowl in Chicago in 2031. How cool is that? It would be even cooler if my Packers are in that game. And if my team can't do it, the Bears, Lions or Vikings would make a great choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You were born in Chicago and you are an avid Packers fan. If one of your parents was a Bears fan where did the go wrong. So I am a Bears fan. I was born in Chicago, but I have lived in Wisconsin since 1957. I was never a Cubs fan being a south sider by the time I got interested in baseball No animosity towards them but they were so bad in those days. A few years after moving to the South side. Living in a National League town I could root for the Braves and the White Sox. I am rooting for the Packers lose every game.

      Delete
  3. As long as the McCaskeys own the Bears, it probably won't make much difference where they play. However, I can't imagine suburbanites being thrilled over the traffic jams which will occur when the Bears are playing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Chicago Bears" is a brand now, not a location. Also FWIW, the population of Chicago in 1950 was 3.6 million, not 3 million.

    ReplyDelete
  5. With the bears stumbling to bitter defeat last night on national television I came right to EGDD thinking I could find some respite from the hand wringing and clutching of pearls by commentators and a fan base desperate for success .

    No need to learn the latest failure of a quarter backs name or any of the others players for that matter. they're all bums.

    I believe the bears own a trademark on Chicago Bears and im not sure the move is written in stone, yet

    Sports fandom is a high form of tribalism and fanbases remain angry for decades when their team leaves town . in New York they've had their heat broken over and over by various franchises in several sports.

    Im from Toronto - well I visited once and our countries share a boarder- so you can claim residency of wherever you want . its very fashionable all the kids are doing it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In all honesty, I wasn't aware they had lost when I wrote this.

      Delete
    2. There record of late has been horrible when the play in prime time. However they draw big on prime time. I am a Bears fan, but they don't deserve playing in those games. If this was like English Soccer they would be relegated.

      Delete
  6. Think back a few decades. I don't assume anything. But I would guess you and Mrs. Steinberg moved from Lakeview to Northbrook way back when for the usual reasons. (If memory serves you lived somewhere in the vicinity of Halsted and Barry or Halsted and Oakdale. You used to write about it.) One of your reasons may have been the budding notion of feathering a nest. You thought it might be pleasant for any resultant children to grow up in a house with a yard, etc. Have their little pals close by. Be able to ride bikes around the neighborhood and camp out in the yard and catch fireflies in a jar and roast weinies. The normal drill. Northbrook was an easy straight shot downtown on the train for you. Why not do it? Entire generations of young people have followed that obvious blueprint: Graduate from college, take first "real job" in Chicago, find that first apartment (preferably around Wrigleyville or Lakeview or Bucktown, etc.), drink with your buddies, meet and court a potential spousal unit, marry and spend a few (not too many!) early years in the city until it's time to...settle down. Hello Northbrook! Hello Elmhurst! Hello Vernon Hills and Arlington Heights and Palatine! You didn't "leave" Chicago. You were already transient. You probably had an idea you'd land in the suburbs after a few years. One way or another. You (thousands of young adults) were but passing through. Chicago was a rite of passage. You'd have funny stories about the time you spent in Lakeview or Ravenswood, etc. YOU should NOT be included in a population loss stat. Folks stepping over the border to Indiana, certainly. Count them. But not that earnest young Ohio college kid, with the firm hand-shake and freshly shined Florsheims, who lived in an apartment for a few years. Count families moving to the southwest and northwest suburbs. Orland Park and Buffalo Grove didn't mysteriously populate themselves with a handful of magic beans. Nope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, my oldest was about to send him to kindergarten, and there was nowhere he could go to school that didn't feel like child abuse.

      Delete
    2. Graduate from Ohio State or Michigan State or Illinois, take that first "real job" in Chicago, find that first apartment (preferably around Wrigleyville or Lakeview or Bucktown, etc.), drink in the bleachers with your buddies, meet and court a potential spousal unit, marry and spend a few (not too many!) early years in the city until it's time to...settle down. And hatch out a kid or two. And then look around for a house in the suburbs, because the young'uns are NOT going into a Chicago public school. Good-bye, North Side. Hello, boonies. Fixed it fer ya.

      Delete
    3. On the one hand, there is the oft-deployed, delightful image of the "leafy, suburban paradise." On the other, let me quote from some guy's swell memoir called "You Were Never in Chicago."

      "... we're leaving the city and decamping to the suburbs tomorrow. Not just to the suburbs, but to Northbrook, a particularly suburban suburb, with neither the moneyed grace of Wilmette or Winnetka, nor the blue-collar pride of Niles or Des Plaines. A neutered nowhere..."

      Ouch! No wonder the Bears aren't going there!

      But the choicest shot is saved for our fair city, as the sentence continues: "...arrived at through a tactical retreat inspired by the crummy city schools and, to be honest, the city itself. The boys need to go through three locked doors ... to reach the street, to descend to the muddy, dog-piss-murdered patch of grass between the sidewalk and the curb to play for a few closely watched minutes beneath the hulking, black-barked, hacked-up trees ... sidestepping bottle caps, petrified dog turds, and broken glass."

      Ouch again! I guess it's no wonder that "we've" lost almost 900,000 residents since 1950. 😉 (BTW, it appears that Anonymous at 8:06 is correct about Chicago's population being 3.6 million in 1950. 🤔)

      Delete
    4. Remember, Jakash, that was written from the perspective of someone who had never lived there, yet. After 25 years, we've taken to the place. I can walk to the library, train, hardware store, grocery store, downtown, half a dozen restaurants. I can see living here for 20 more years, which would probably not be true were I still on Pine Grove Avenue.

      Delete
    5. I realized that you wouldn't have written that about Northbrook today, NS. I started to add a sentence to that effect, but since my comments are too long to begin with, I left it out. I just thought that those jabs were pretty funny!

      Might as well mention: The hyperlink starting out this entry -- "In my post about going back-and-forth with CNN," goes to this same post, not the one about CNN. 🙂

      Delete
    6. Writing from Lincoln Square: "I can walk to the library, train, (okay, not this, hardware store), grocery store, (or this -- but that el! downtown), (many many more than) half a dozen restaurants. I can see living here for 20 more years" Plus a state-performing high school .... There are lovely places in the city

      Delete
    7. You're in a desirable location, Mister S. If anywhere at all can be called Beautiful Downtown Northbrook, you live in it. Or near it. The train station and all the stores. Spent eleven years in Skokie as a kid, and 17 more in Evanston, as an adult. So I'm not really all that familiar or well-versed with your leafy suburban paradise, even though I had "mispocha" there for a good fifty years.

      But it sounds like you are either in, or within close proximity, to the original town of Northbrook. Most of the rest of it is nothing at all like where you live. It's pretty much, for good and for ill, the quintessential American suburb.

      When, in 1965, my parents looked at new houses in the "rest of" Northbrook, I held my breath and prayed they wouldn't relocate there. Got my wish. But five years later, they did move. To Florida.

      Delete
  7. I nominate Caleb Williams as the name of a current Chicago Bears player, which happens to also be the name of a novel written more than 200 years ago by William Godwin, the father of the creator of Frankenstein. You can look it up!

    tate

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have little respect for teams that play outside of the city limits and call themselves of that very city. it seems like a cop out, an insult.

    Ironically, they all do it for bigger stadiums and more money all while getting public funds to boot.

    The rich get richer...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While this was not in the form of a question, the answer to all or most questions is money

      Delete
  9. Does it actually matter? I am, admittedly, not a football fan. The last Superbowl I watched was .. ahem .. 1985. I don't understand why everyday people, working folks, are so enamored of a "game" owned by immensely rich families who don't necessarily live here and played by immensely rich athletes who surely don't live here. Do they imagine that those owners and players actually give a RRFRA about the town and residents they purport to represent? Maybe it's fantasy. Maybe it's an unattainable dream. Maybe it's projection. There's a lot of that now. So I guess it really doesn't matter .. as long as NO taxpayer money is used to sustain and expand those rich owners and players.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As Seinfeld said you are pretty much rooting for laundry. I am not crazy like some people. I used to get more upset when I was way younger when the Bears lost. There wasn't really pro football back in the early 1900's. Baseball was the big sport. Most players back then came from rural areas. I am pretty sure most went back where they once lived. And they are rich because they are the product making the money for the rich owners. Back in the old days players couldn't be free agents. You were tied to the team that drafted you. You stayed with that team until the team decided they didn't want you. The best players generally stayed the team that drafted them. At least for the majority of the career. Talk about getting cheap labor even way back.

      Delete
  10. They are allowed to identify as "Chicago" unless they start putting ketchup on their hotdogs.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I stopped watching sports decades ago when as a teen when I discovered many teams were operating under fake names. A lie is a lie. To lie daily while stoking rivalry and hero worship, abusing players, employees and communities all to increase owners' personal wealth, under a false symbols... Oh, our fearless leader just flashed in my brain!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am a Northbrook resident – and a Green Bay Packers fan. I guess that says it all.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now that the antisemitic owner has passed on, allowing the rest of the McCaskeys to avoid hundreds of millions in capital gains, the family should sell the team to a billionaire who will bring in other investors to pay for the stadium.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Here's a name to learn: Caleb Williams.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes learn that name you're going to put it on a list with Mitch trubisky ,Justin fields, and too many others to list here failed bears quarterbacks

      Delete
    2. I don't think we should be worrying too much about the play of the Bears quite yet. We've only had our second game in the history of the franchise that was not attended by Virginia Hallas Makaski. we're way behind her terrible record. it will take time.

      Delete
    3. were you spelling her name wrong on purpose

      Delete
  15. I hadn't watched a game in years but decided to join male members of the family on the couch last night? Are there any other team's jerseys covered with initials of dead people? Also the Viking helmets were way cooler. Who won? I wasn't paying attention.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't give a crap about the Bears and have long been mystified about their preposterously outsized place in this city's culture. Especially since they've sucked for so long. Yesterday, the first 5 pages of the S-T sports section were devoted to them BEFORE the game. Today, 7 pages. Whatever; the NFL is big business, obviously, and was that way even before it became primarily a gambling option.

    I just would love to see the Bears season-ticket list and know what percentage of fans who actually attend games come from the Northern Suburbs, anyway. Regardless of anything else, taking all that traffic out of the city would be a plus! Now, losing the hotel, restaurant and other associated Bears-related revenues will not be ideal, of course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So pro football was not as popular as pro football util the Colts won the first overtime championship game. You could always bet on pro football even though it wasn't a big deal. Once the point spread was introduced that helped to explode betting. Las Vegas was the only place you could bet on sports for a long time. Now many states have sports books and of course today you don't even have to do go to a sports book. You can do it on your phone.

      Delete
  17. We need more thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've been to only one Bears game in person, sufficient for me to conclude that I'd rather watch them on TV. Aside from a better view of the game, one big incentive for me to stick to televiewing in future was what a colossal pain in the butt it was to get to Soldier Field and back.

    Now look at the map surrounding Arlington Park, and you can see how insanely convenient it is to get there from practically anywhere: Route 53 borders it to the west for high-speed access north or south, Northwest Highway borders it on the north for people who want to drive out from the 'burbs, and running parallel to it is the Metra Northwest Line, which already has a station for Arlington Park and can take you all the way downtown from there, similar to how the North Line serves Ravinia on concert nights.

    In short, regardless of whatever financial shenanigans are and will be doubtless occurring behind the scenes, I can't fault their choice of location (though I do miss the horse racing, and seeing horses on the practice track from my morning train). The surrounding infrastructure is mostly all there; it will just need some beefing up of capacity.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor. Comments that are not submitted under a name of some sort run the risk of being deleted without being read.