2025 was a fine year when many good things occurred.

 

Original cartoon by K.C. Green

    With the year waning, the Washington Post editorial board came up with a list of "25 Good Things That Happened in 2025." Displaying it prominently, on the upper right corner of their web site.
    They start with Chicagoan Robert Prevost becoming the first American pope, Leo XIV. Hard to argue that one. 
    Hard to argue most of their points. A growing American economy, despite random tariffs imposed and withdrawn with mad, Lewis Carroll abandon. Overdose deaths and obesity down, alternate energy and tiger populations up.
     There was only one thing I completely disagreed with — No. 15: "Idaho, Indiana, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming adopted universal school choice programs, bringing the total to 18 states." School choice is a sham to direct public dollars into private, often parochial, schools. It benefits those who are already ahead of the game, and leaves those in public schools in an even worse situation.
    No, what bothered me most was the exercise. Though the editorial board pointed out that they've done this before, I couldn't help but reflect how the Jeff Bezos-owned Post has drifted Trumpward over the past year. Ticking off everything good that happened in 2025 is a half sly way of saying, "Things aren't so bad!" I thought of that meme of the dog sitting in the burning room, saying, "This is fine."
     Everything, of course is not fine. When your house is on fire, you don't list the rooms that aren't burning, yet and admire the as-yet-unsinged curtains. How can you cite China's lowering carbon emissions and rising support for nuclear power without noting that our country has abandoned clean energy across the board?
     No mention of immigration at all. Any list I created would cite the good thing of regular Americans turning out, in Chicago and elsewhere, to push back against ICE, to defend their friends and neighbors.  I'd say if you mention Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce getting engaged — a joy to the world for sure —that the massive No Kings rallies deserve a place of prominence too.    
    Most telling is what is missing. Not a word about our president. The name "Trump" doesn't appear in their list of two dozen plus one good things that happened this year. Of course not. Everything Trump touches dies. So a little credit for not trying to spin one of rare defendable actions —eliminating the penny, for example.

      Still, an unwelcome bit of ballyhoo. A reminder that there are sins of omission as well as sins of commission. The MAGA world stands on chairs and howls their praise. While the bought-off, the compromised, and the oblivious, cough into their fists and talk about California embracing phonics education. 
     Good things happened in 2025. But so what? Unless some really good things happen in 2026 and 2027 and, especially, 2028, we're still going to be fucked, utterly. Never forget that.

     

Armored car

     Sometimes you notice something and realize: "Haven't seen one of those in a long time!"
     Like this armored car that pulled up at the entrance of the Chicago Botanic Garden as my wife and I were leaving Monday.

     Strolling through the grounds, I'd read a sign board listing the price for specialty cocktails — $17 —and figured there had to be a joke in there somewhat. "Must be raking it in with that spiced rum hot wassail concession..."

     But rather than say that — shutting up is an art form I struggle to master —I fell to musing on the subject of armored cars. I used to see them all the time. Then again, I used to be walking around the Loop five days a week. There could still be one on every street corner, for all I know.

     But i doubt it. I couldn't remember last time I'd seen one. I haven't touched money in weeks. My automatic assumption is that a decrease in cash usage has led to reduced demand for armored cars.

     Half true, according to an initial AI gloss. I asked if the armored car business suffered because of decrease use of cash. Cash is down but other services are up:

"Yes, the decreased use of cash due to digital payments puts downward pressure on the demand for traditional cash-in-transit (CIT) armored car services, forcing companies to diversify into handling high-value goods, documents, or investing in technology like smart safes; however, cash still remains vital for many, so the industry isn't disappearing but evolving with new security needs. 

     Seeking to back that up — you cannot trust AI — I found this marketing report, that suggests steady growth for the CIT industry, thanks to that diversification.

     Which got me curious — just what do they charge for hauling cash around? How much, for instance, to transport $1 million in cash five miles across Chicago? AI said that it depends on the route and the level of security provided, but anywhere from a few hundred dollars to $1,000 on bonded services like Loomis or Brinks.  Sounds right.

     My next question is: should I use AI to answer these questions, or tracking down the original sources? It seemed to boil down to a question of expectations. The first answer differed from what I thought —armored car companies are suffering — so I had to confirm that it was correct. The second answer, about the cost of armored car services, had what I call the "tang of veracity," so I trusted it. Why not? Everyone else seems to be doing it.

Flashback 2006: Have a happy one — try, anyway

Ron Bernardi, of Sunset Foods in Northbrook, setting the tone in 2024.

     How was your Wednesday? I've had better. While you were hugging relatives and chugging nog and whatever else you do at this happy time of year, I was struggling through a computer snafu of my own creation and then trying to reproduce the writing I had stupidly lost. It left me at 6 p.m. drained, teeth on edge, wondering how to spread some joy on your Christmas Day. Then I realized: I've been at this a long, long time. I bet there is some joy from years past that will serve. This does big time —it even includes a shot at Donald Trump, and a reminder that he never, ever learns or changes, since my observation of 19 years ago is spot on today. This ran back when the column filled a page, and I've kept in the original subheadings. Merry Christmas.

OPENING SHOT

     "Do you think this is a particularly grim Christmas?" I asked the managing editor. "People are saying it's grim."
     "I think that depends upon whom you ask," he said. "Look at our circle."
     I instantly understood.
     "We're middle-aged," I said. "Everything seems grim."
     We both laughed.
     Phyllis, the bartender at the Billy Goat on Washington, has her own theory about why the season feels the way it does.
     "It's the weather," she says, leaning in, as if confiding a secret. "Too sunny. Too warm. It isn't right. Something is out of whack."
     Something is always out of whack. Especially at the holidays, so often plagued by problems and pressures. Getting everything wrapped and ready and everybody in the car and all the relatives and grudges to deal with once you claw through the traffic and get there, made all the worse by the canard that everything is supposed to be perfect and happy and Norman Rockwellian.
     Christmas is a time to rest and reconnect, to celebrate and ponder, and try to be a little less miserable than usual. To whatever degree you can, I hope you have a happy one, and remember this: It beats working.
     Usually.

IT DRIVES 'EM CRAZY . . .

     Donald Trump is not the brightest man. Yes, he is rich, but his father was a millionaire real estate developer — an inexplicably obscure fact — and he would have been flush had he never done a single deal.
     So naturally Trump would thickly rise to Rosie O'Donnell's bait, to her unarguable observation that Trump isn't exactly a moral role model for America's youth. He should have laughed it off, but instead he replied with a barrage of insults — that Rosie is fat, is loud, is a lesbian. Typical Trump, as classy as a gold-plated toilet handle.
     The media, of course, responded like grade schoolers on a playground, shouting, "Fight! Fight!" and egging the participants on to deliver fresh insults and keep the thing going.
     Perhaps I'm biased, but Rosie seems to be the winner here. Has The Donald learned nothing from being ridiculed, non-stop, for the last 20 years? When someone castigates you, the most cutting response is to pretend you're indifferent. Oh really? Did Rosie say that? How wry. . . .
     Even better is real indifference. I've earned my share of enemies — OK, more than my share — over the years, and have learned that nothing leaves them fuming in the dust like warmly casting away all hard feelings and resentments on my part and viewing them affectionately, with perhaps a trace of pity.
      Forgiveness is always portrayed as a humble, spiritual act, and I guess it can be. But abandoning resentment also makes you feel good and can be a clever, soft form of attack, as well. The Florentine master, of course, said it best.
     "The wise man will not lock the chamber of forgiveness," Dante wrote in his Convivio. "Because to forgive is a fine victory in war."
      

On the watch

     'Tis the season to buy expensive watches, apparently. There were 28 photos of watch faces in ads in the front section of the New York Times on Thursday. So while I still believe — as I wrote before — that wearing watches will be less prevalent because of the clocks built in to cell phones and such, all those fancy watches represent one rather large exception that I didn't consider, not until my colleague Richard Roeper, passing me in the hall, yanked up his sleeve to show a knee-weakening example of the Swiss watchmaker's art and noted, with typical pith:
     "You can't bring your car into a bar."
     Translation: Financially successful men will always want to strap on a few grand — or a few dozen grand — worth of wristwatch, as a subtle reminder to those who might not otherwise grasp that their cisterns of cool capital are deep and wide and filled to the brim. Must be nice.
     Speaking of watch ads — I couldn't examine two dozen-plus photos of pricey timepieces without noticing that the old custom of watch ads showing 10:10 still holds mainly true — 26 of the 28 watches advertised had that magic hour, though the precise time tended to be 10:08 or 10:09 on many of the watches.
     The classic explanation is that setting the hands that way shows off the manufacturer's logo, typically under the "12," is balanced, and resembles a smile. Though sometimes the practice is carried out to irrational limits, such as the "woman's dual time zone stainless steel watch with diamond markers, mother-of-pearl dial and purple galuchat strap," a steal at $1,320.
     The watch has two faces, with both set to 10:10, which is just silly, plus being a reminder that a true world-shaking executive could figure out the time on the coasts by simple addition or subtraction of an hour or two, without the crutch of a second dial.

TODAY'S DEFINITION

     Galuchat: The skin of various fish, such as dogfish, small sharks, etc.
     You'd think for $1,320, they wouldn't give you a fish-skin strap.

TODAY'S CHUCKLE:

     John Williams from WGN called just now and asked me to talk with him a bit.
     While waiting to go on the air, I phoned my wife.
     "I'm a gonna be on the raydyo!" I enthused.
     She listened in, and called me immediately afterward.
     "You sounded good — very cheerful," she said.
     "I was just feigning cheerfulness," I admitted.
     "Well, feign it when you get home, too," she said.    

— Originally published in the Sun-Times, Dec. 24, 2006

At Christmas, cops, Chinese cuisine and a fallen firefighter hero

     Ah, Christmas memories. Crouched in the back of a CPD squad car cruising through Englewood. Diners crowded into a busy River North Thai restaurant. The great rose window of the Rose of Sharon Community Baptist Church, backlit by flame.
     Not your average Christmas memories. Then again, I am not your average Christmas celebrant. In fact, I've never observed the holiday in my life. Never woke up and scampered downstairs to see what Santa left me. Never lived in a house with a tree. Not once. I'm a Jew. We don't do Christmas.
     Okay, not generally. Some Jews do. They figure, the holiday is secular enough, why not join the party? Why miss out on fun, even if it's somebody else's fun? And I don't judge them.
     Okay, maybe I judge them a little. Cookies and carols are one thing. But a tree? Really? A "Hanukkah bush"? It's like wearing a medal for a battle you didn't fight in.
     What I have done, quite religiously, is work on Christmas. This year, needing to blow off a week of vacation or else lose it — and never losing vacation is close to holy writ for me — I deliberately took off the week of the 15th, so as to be back now, to lighten the load for my colleagues who have presents to wrap and mistle to toe and whatever else it is must be done to commemorate Jesus's birth.
     When I started at the Sun-Times, I'd work the night shift at Christmas, 6 p.m. to 2 a.m., grumbling mightily, trying to hide the fact that being in the newsroom on Christmas was great. You got paid double-time. There were platters of cookies and cold cuts. Not many people around. Often a bottle tucked somewhere. I remember sitting at the slot — the U-shaped central news desk — with ... thinking hard ... Jim Merriner, maybe? Silently sipping bourbon in white styrofoam coffee cups. Listening to the police scanner crackle at midnight.
     Being me, I tried to take advantage of the opportunity, wondering: who else works Christmas? I spent Christmas eve, 1986, riding around Englewood in the back of a police cruiser with a pair of rookies. Writing the story gave me a lot of respect for police officers — I was scared, running up the stairway of a pitch black six-flat, and I was with two cops.
     Another Christmas I visited Asian restaurants and interviewed Jews — and Muslims — happily chowing down. One said that eating Chinese food on Christmas is a Jewish tradition. Prompting a rabbi to phone me a couple days later to express outrage that I had somehow maligned Jewish traditions. I said something along the lines of "Rabbi, don't you see that you complaining is a worse insult to Judaism than the thing you're complaining about?" Leading to further complaints, meetings and apologies, teaching me a valuable lesson: save candor for people you respect.

To continue reading, click here.

'Celebrating you on your special day'

 

    Modern life is jammed with decisions. Do this, buy that. Or don't do that, don't buy this. Being married, my wife and I typically make decisions together. In the past, big decisions — buying a condo; having children. Lately, small decisions.
     A friend of her family, Bobby, turned 100 over the weekend. He was a classmate of her mother's —used to dip her pigtails in the inkwell, he used to say. There was a party, at his apartment in Arlington Heights. A card seemed in order. The Hallmark shop in Northbrook closed long ago — sending cards is not the thing it used to be, I suppose. So we went to Osco, which has a wide selection of cards.

     The birthday section offers age-specific cards, intended for children turning 1, 2, 3, and such. We speculated, as we hunted, whether there would be a "So you're 100!" card. My  hunch was there would not be — think of how small that market is. But there it was. An elegant-yet-lighthearted, gold-lettered card —you wouldn't want something too jokey, or too serious, or leering. I examined it.

      "This one is pretty," my wife said, showing me another card, cheerful, arty, with cut-outs of balloons. A nice card. But also, I felt, a missed opportunity.
     "How often do you get the chance?" I said, making the case for the 100 years card in my hands. My view carried the day, and we bought the card. My wife had me make copies of two photos of Bobby and his wife, posing with her parents and other friends, at some long-ago occasion, maybe 60 years ago, and we tucked them in the card.

     The tough part about decisions is there are usually multiple factors involved, and you can't consider everything, try though you might. My wife, sharper than me, saw the problem minutes later, in the car.

     "I wonder how many people will buy that exact card?" 

     Produced by American Greetings, it was probably in every Osco in the city. 

     We arrived at the party. I could not resist looking about and noticing three of our card's distinctive blue envelopes, piled atop gifts. And two more on the piano. Plus one identical card that had already been opened. And ours. Making seven in plain sight. No doubt more elsewhere.

     No big harm. Repetition is a key part of growing old, routines you cherish, and those you don't. The birthday boy and his family may have even had a laugh over the seven identical cards. That's a present in itself.

The Chicago City Council fights an inferno with squirt guns

 

     Well, it took 'em long enough.
     Where was this City Council spirit of rebellion when Richard M. Daley was giving away the city's parking meter concession in 2008? Cutting off a major revenue stream for the next 75 years, leaving $4 billion on the table, a blunder called "the worst privatization deal in U.S. history."
     A few days of review, and the Council rubber stamped the folly, 40 to 5.
     No more. In a rare Saturday vote, the council voted 30 to 18 to send Mayor Brandon Johnson its own budget plan, rejecting his spending plan as unworkable.
     Is it? Heck if I know. The details of municipal planning are a nosedive into the weeds.
     But maybe we should peer into the undergrowth anyway. Given the entire future of Chicago is teetering on the edge of a cliff, ready to plunge into bankruptcy and ruin, we are obligated to put on our thinking caps and consider it, once again.
     When I wrote about this in 2014, as Rahm Emanuel grappled with the issue, the unfunded pension obligation was $32 billion. Now, it's more than $50 billion.
     That's the central problem. The city is on the hook for more pension debt than 44 states — Chicago has a bigger pension burden than Florida.
     How did that happen? Politics. Chicago has 32,000 city workers. Whether those workers vote for you or an opponent can decide an election. Easy to promise them gravy you don't have.
     And that isn't the only problem. COVID hollowed out the city's economic life while ramping up expenses. Texas started sending busloads of undocumented immigrants, and while housing them was the right thing to do, it still cost money.
     Chicago sure needs the people. The city's population is 2.7 million. You know what it was in 2020? 2.7 million. In 2010? 2.7 million. The city population has roughly plateaued for the past 45 years. Chicago has has fewer people now than it did 100 years ago. Can't tax people who aren't here.
     That's the deficit side. Now let's look at the proposed solutions.
     The mayor wants to put a head tax on business — that, plus his lack of even a flicker of political savvy, stirred the Council to act against him. But their proposal is just as weak as his. Increase fees on plastic grocery bags. Sell advertising on city light poles. Video poker.
     Do you see a difference in scale? The problems are enormous, involving billions of dollars in forced payments, hundreds of thousands of people wandering off or staying away. The proposed solutions are so feeble. The house is on fire, and the mayor and City Council are fighting over an array of squirt guns, arguing which will work best.
     Sigh.

To continue reading, click here.

Getting hung up on art

"Lyra" by Jessica Joslin

     Context is important.

     I went to the West Town Chamber of Commerce in Ukrainian Village on Friday night. Some of Tony Fitzpatrick's artist friends had gotten together to put on a show, "Black Swan Elegies," in his honor, and invited me. The Metra schedule gave me the choice of being a little early or a little late, and I chose early, so I could leisurely walk a cigar up Western and then east along Chicago Avenue. 

     I was the first guest there, so had time to  admire the various artworks, such as Jessica Joslin's dramatic bird above. 

     After I'd looked at the pieces, I went into the hallway, toward the front room, where there was a bar, and a spread of cookies. The choice was wine, but the bartender kindly dug up a bottle of chilled water for me. 

     Passing back through the hall, I noticed this line of little birds — Tony did like his birds —and appreciated their crisp uniformity, so snapped a photo.

    I looked for the placard, for the artist's name, the piece's title. But didn't notice one, and didn't think much of that. An oversight perhaps.

     More people arrived. I talked to friends in the front room. Then decided to go back into the gallery, now filling up with people. 

     Only then did I realize my mistake. For a bright guy, I can be extraordinarily dense. Do you see it coming? I certainly didn't. I had a good laugh at myself. Those unfortunates who have to always insist that they're right, even when they're wrong, never know the pleasure — nearly a joy — of having a good laugh at your own expense. Not art. A coatrack.