Regular EGD readers are familiar with Jack Clark, the former Chicago cabbie turned mystery writer who checks in occasionally, most recently in 2023. Today he comments on a pervasive problem in our social media age: fraud.
I opened my first bank account in 1957 with my First Communion money and closed it ten years later when I was 17. The bank officer was amused. He told me that, according to current rules, I was too young to open an account on my own.
I’ve had plenty of banks and bank accounts since then, and I could bore you silly with some of my bank stories. But I’m going to skip that. Something exciting has finally happened. After 60-some years of banking, I’ve been the victim of check fraud. Twice, with a single transaction.
It all started when I got a direct mail solicitation from Block Club Chicago. Now, I’m a nice enough guy, but I never donate to anyone but panhandlers. I’m the classic struggling writer (except about 50 years too old). People should be sending me money. But Block Club is really pretty cool and Jenny Sabella who is one of the founders and the executive editor is even cooler.
We first met when she got hired as a waitress/bartender at the Grafton Pub in Lincoln Square. This was just around the corner from my apartment. I liked to stop in on the way home. “Hey Jack, you should meet Jenny,” the bartender said one night. “She’s a writer too.”
“Oh cool,” I said. “What do you write about?”
“Sex,” she said, and we’ve been friends ever since.
For obvious reasons, I don’t get many solicitations. But when I do it’s usually for the Lyric Opera or the Art Institute, places like that. Somehow I’ve gotten myself on some arty mailing list. So I was impressed that Block Club had dropped a few dollars and given the list a try. Should I actually send them some money?
Jenny, who knew a thing or two about being a struggling writer (and did it at the appropriate age and then moved on), had promised me that I’d never have to pay for Block Club. Maybe now was the time to pony up.
And there was a bonus. If I donated $60 or more they’d send me six Chicago postcards. That may not be exciting to you but I’m a newlywed and my bride is a postcard freak. There’s no other way to put it. She likes to send them but, even more than that, she likes to buy them. I’d say for every postcard she sends, she buys 10 or 20. I’ve spent hours waiting outside cute little shops while she’s inside spinning the postcard racks.
Well, this would impress the lovely Helene, I decided. I filled out the form and included a check for $100 and dropped the envelope in the mailbox before I could have second thoughts. The extra $40 was so Jenny wouldn’t think I was a cheapsteak. [I know. I think it’s funnier this way.]
And then I waited for the postcards to arrive. Nothing. I checked my bank account. The check had not cleared. What was taking so long? It finally cleared nearly a month after I’d sent it. I was about to write Jenny: You’ve got to get those checks in the bank before people change their minds!
The wonders of online banking. You don’t have to wait for your cancelled checks to arrive a month later. You can view them online. Before writing Jenny, I thought I’d take a look. The front of the check looked fine. It was to the order of Block Club and my signature was artistically scrawled along the bottom. On the back of the check the fraud finally arrived (I know you’ve been waiting). The check was not endorsed by Block Club; it was endorsed with my name, which makes no sense. Now if you were going to forge the name of the person who wrote the check wouldn’t you try to imitate his handwriting. Not this guy. You can actually read every letter of my name. What kind of signature is that? He’d obviously never been to art school. The check was deposited into an account at a credit union in Virginia.
I wrote Jenny and sent her copies of the check. She wrote back: “This is SO weird. That was definitely not cashed by us.”
Next I called my bank, Wintrust, who I’ve had very good luck with in the past. I figured the call would take about five minutes. Instead it took a half hour or more. Most of that time I was on hold. I talked to three different bankers. They all agreed that the check had almost certainly been stolen. They kept failing as they tried to connect me to the manager at my local branch. “Why do we have to talk to him?” I finally asked.
“You’re going to have to close your account and open a new one.” (Note: all dialogue is reconstructed from memory.)
“Why?”
“Well, your account has been compromised. They have your account number and the routing number. They could. . .”
“That’s ridiculous. You can find the routing number of any bank in about eight seconds.” Banks want you to send them money. “And both numbers are on the checks. Anybody I send a check to sees them.” And the world is full of scoundrels who often disguise themselves by working for legitimate businesses, even banks now and then.
“I’m sorry, sir,” she said in a tone that let me know the discussion was over.
I asked to speak to a supervisor and soon a manager was on the line. We went through the same song and dance. She said that the bank would recommend that I get a new account.
“So I don’t have to?”
“No. But you know we have recorded this entire conversation. So if you have another problem later on, you might not recover your money.”
“Are you threatening me?” Is what I wish I’d said.
When the call finally ended, I called right back. I didn’t want to talk to anyone. I just wanted to make sure I got the wording of their message exactly. “Please note: Your call may be recorded for quality and training purposes.” Not one word about legal purposes or retribution for not following bank recommendations.
So that’s the second clear case of fraud. Consider yourself forewarned: You may be sitting in a courtroom some day or at a deposition, and somebody on the other side will play that recording supposedly made for quality and training purposes.
Should we tell the person who picks up that recorded call, “I agree to have this conversation recorded for quality and training purposes only. Nothing beyond that?”
One final question: Should I follow the bank’s advice and close my account and open another? Let me know what you think. I’m honestly confused.
Very informative and a good lesson to learn. It would be a huge hassle to change your account, especially if you have auto withdrawals from there. I find if you go on the fb or other social media website of the business, you often get results. Go smear them.
ReplyDeleteYou're a writer, Jack. You write (And you also know a few things about cab driving, truck driving, and furniture moving). Wintrust is a bank. They do bank stuff. They seem to be holding all the cards in this game. Frankly, they're making it clear that they don't need you. The bottom line (sorry) is...how much do you need them?
ReplyDeleteThey've been rude and unprofessional. They've threatened you, by implying that you might have to lawyer up to recover any stolen funds in the future. And technically, they recorded that call without your knowledge or consent--which I'm guessing is probably legal in this situation. But only because nobody ever objects to anyone doing so...after they've been up-front about it. With that bogus disclaimer about "quality and training purposes"--strictly a CYA move. Seems fraudulent and sketchy. Not being an attorney, I can't play one online, either.
Do you follow their advice. and let them behave like a-holes, and just let it slide?
Or do you walk away from the table and cash out?
Close your account and open another...at another bank. And let them know why. Rip them a new orifice. They're not the only game in town. Especially in a town as big as Chicago. Ask around for recommendations. Make like Woody Allen...take the money and run. Run like hell. And don't look back.
Close the account. Open one at a credit union. They are more customer oriented. I have had an account at one for 54 years and never had a hassle. When I've had to call, I've never been transferred to more than one person. When they call me, they give me a direct line to the person making the call. Never have my calls been recorded.
ReplyDeleteYes you should close the account. They're trying to protect you and also themselves. You could go to another bank but you would be treated the same way if not worse. If you are looking for a more personal banking service, maybe try a credit union.
ReplyDeleteYour bank should do the work of going after that credit union in Virginia. The credit union should never have accepted the check. Remember, your bank works for you. Not the other way around.
ReplyDeleteYes, close your account and open another one. And when you do -- don't write checks anymore. It's just too dangerous nowadays. I haven't written a check in three years. Use Zelle.
ReplyDeletezelle I thought I heard was closing, try venmo
DeleteMy online bank is nicer than my brick-and- mortar bank as well as having higher interest and lower fees.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry this happened to you, Jack. It's an unsatisfying, time-consuming ordeal to attempt to make things 'right' after being scammed. And its made worse when you are scammed while doing 'good'.
ReplyDeleteI'm confused about whether the solicitation from Block Club was real. Was it a genuine appeal from Block Club that got hijacked when your check was stolen out of a public mailbox, or was the entire solicitation a scam, with a phony enclosed return envelope?
Either way, it stinks.
I'm pretty sure it was a real solicitation. I've been in touch with Block Club and they never gave me any reason to think otherwise.
DeleteI also haven't gotten my postcards yet either. But im pretty sure they're in route. I did send Block Club another $100, online this time.
DeleteI think there's still too small of a statistical sample here to say that Wintrust is Evil and All Other Banks are Good. I will note that my father always had excellent personalized service from the staff at the Wilmette branch, great people there, but when I tried to set up an account for his estate at the McHenry branch, they seemed uninterested in helping, and I landed happily at JPMorgan Chase instead.
ReplyDeleteThe bank would prefer that Jack open a new account because they don't want to have to fend off more fake checks with that account number headed their way from who knows where. Given the length of a modern account number, the odds of an evildoer landing on a valid one by guessing are pretty remote, so Jack's known-good number has some value.
That said, shouldn't that credit union in Virginia be doing a lot more explaining? They're the ones who handed out the cash, presumably to someone they can identify.
P.S. I think the disclaimer about "recording for training and quality purposes only" is so vague that it could cover everything and nothing. On the other hand, I'd like to reserve a special place in hell for the ones that start out by lying: "Please listen closely as our menu choices have recently changed."
It could have been worse. It was worse for a friend of mine who sent a 400 and something check to pay a utility bill and the thief squeezed in an extra thousand dollars, with both banks involved insisting it was the other dude that done it.
ReplyDeletetate
You mentioned at the outset that you've had good luck with Wintrust in the past, and they covered your $100 loss without much of a hassle. I feel like I would give them the benefit of the doubt and follow their advice even though it seems unnecessary.
ReplyDeleteThey haven't covered my loss yet. But I'm sure hoping they do.
DeleteHello, Mr. Clark (and Neil, of course)
ReplyDeleteSorry to hear of your recent travails with our banking industry, which, like the medical insurance industry, treats interations with actual people, i.e. customers, as a necessary evil, much preferring to deal with us a cyber-entity comprised of a computer address and account number.
However, that aside, I would like to deviate to your writing in general, which I thoroughly enjoy. I've mentioned in the past that I've purchased Nobody's Angel, Dancing on Graves, Hack Writting & Other Stories, and have enjoyed reading the first two (Hack Writing was still in the to-be-read stack, but It's been advanced to the top for the reason that follows!). Via the links that Neil so thoughtfully provided, I was able to reacquaint myself with the story of Ruby and Schuba's, and although it saddened me once again, I did enjoy reading your slice-of-life account of 1980's Chicago, before Richard M. accelerated the gentrification of the North Side.
Any chance of contribuing more of your circa-1980's / 1990's era recollections? Although short-form, the story of Ruby contained amazing detail, such as the reference to WMAQ - All Country, and it triggered so many memories of life in Chicago prior to and in the early days of Richard M. Chicago is still a wonderful city, one of the best places to be, but I still enjoy the stories of days passed, when the North Side was a bit more gritty. Would you have enough short-form stories, such as the story of Ruby, to form a sort of self-published compendium, even in digital, i.e. Kindle, form? However it should occur, I would enjoy reading more.
And, Neil, while I'm on the subject, in the past, I enjoyed immensely your online postings of your trip to Anartica, and at the time would eagerly wait in anticipation of them. Any chance of reposting those previous online postings, maybe one per week, on a Saturday for example? You've done something similary reposting occasionally the adventures of the Western trip with your sons. Perhaps these could even be reposted once per week on a Saturday? I enjoy your writing in any format, but these sort of "short story" reports were very interesting, especially the Anartica trip, which is something I'll not be able to do.
Anyway, thank you both for your contributions to my reading enjoyment!
Jim
Argh! My apologies for not proofreading and noticing the misspelling of Antarctica, and other grammatical errors. This will teach me to not post at length using my mobile device! My 65 year old eyes are no longer able to perform such a task, sadly so.
DeleteNo worries, Jim. As I sometimes say, "Too right is two air." Whoops, I mean, "To write is to err." I'm happy to run Jack Clark's work as often as he feels inclined to share it. I don't repost old posts on EGD — that seems lazy, plus I don't have to, as they're all still there (you can use the search bar at the upper left to find them, or go to the archive at bottom left). Every summer I tell myself I'm going to post the entire book I wrote about going out West with the boys, but as I still harbor a tiny, guttering hope it could actually be printed — my yardstick for success — I hold back. If you want to find posts I consider above-average, you might want to plug "State of the Blog" into the search bar, and that'll lead you to year end posts where I highlight what I consider the year's best work. Thanks for reading.
DeleteUsing "State of the Blog" sounds like an excellent shortcut and time-saver. Never would have thought of that. Thanks for the heads-up, Mister S.
DeleteYes close the account....period
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading all that. I've been writing novels lately. I can't find a publisher but I'm not really letting that bother me. Eventually, I'll self publish the entire mess. I plan to self publish a memoir of my days as a long-haul furniture mover: HONEST LABOR, Writing & Moving Furniture, probably early in the new year. I'm also going to publish a collection of short stories: EDDIE MILES DRIVES AGAIN & other stories. Some of those stories might have a little of what you're looking for. But they're all fiction. As far as memories of the old days, when something hits me, I write it if I can. But besides Neil's blog, there's nowhere to send it. I can't tell you how much I miss the old Reader. My first story there was in 1975. I might have written very little without their we'll-publish-anything-good-if-it's-about-Chicago policy.
ReplyDelete