Thursday, October 5, 2023

What just happened?

     At 1:18 p.m. Wednesday, I heard my wife's phone sound downstairs then, a moment later, mine buzzed.
     The national alert we had been told about. I'd noticed online reports about nutbag conspiracy theories — that the alert will somehow activate "nanoparticles" in people's bloodstream, injected along with the COVID vaccine, causing Marburg virus to manifest itself. Crazy stuff; hard for me to believe anybody believes that. But apparently some do, unless it's somebody's plea for attention.
     For me, the alert evoked memories of that  horrendous grating noise they used to play periodically over the radio as a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.
     I always wondered why the tone had to sound so awful, like Satan clearing his throat. Why couldn't it be something neutral, a gong, say, or even soothing. A harp glissando. With a disaster potentially bearing down on us; isn't comfort in order?
     I read the message, took a screenshot, and wondered two things:
     First, what conceivable emergency would require the entire nation to be notified at once? The United States is almost 2,900 miles across at its widest point. No weather, no natural disaster affects more than a part of it. Any attack would be localized. So what are we practicing for? 
     Reading up, I quickly realized that though the test is nationwide, the alerts are typically used in one region or another, to alert an area to an advancing hurricane or raging wildfire. There are practical applications to this, not merely improbable doomsday scenarios.
     You have to wonder what the practical result of ringings tens of millions of phones — I wonder how many car accidents resulted, for instance.
     Leading to my second question: how do they alert everyone at once? By what process? Turns out to be quite complicated. The Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, has a system it calls Integrated Public Alert & Warning System, or IPAWS
   They explain it this way:
     IPAWS allows Alerting Authorities to write their own message using commercially available software that is Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) compliant. The message is then delivered to the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System, Open Platform for Emergency Networks (IPAWS OPEN), where it is authenticated and then delivered simultaneously through multiple communication pathways. Through IPAWS, one message is created to reach as many people as possible to save lives and protect property.

     That's heavy sledding — as best I can figure it is, the government sends service providers a signal, and then every cell tower in their network scattershots out a pre-ordained message to every phone on the system. There is a chart that may or may not help.

    It's sort of an amazing thing, even if you only hazily understand the process — count me among you. Even for those of us muddy on the system, I think it's important to always ask, to make an effort to understand how a particular thing happens. Otherwise, we get into the habit of not bothering to even try to wrap our heads around a system, and risk shrugging off our technology as unknowable magic.


33 comments:

  1. its surprising that you summarily dismiss the idea the government or corporations could be up to no good. why would anyone ever think THAT?

    I hadn't heard anything about nano particles and Magnus virus til you brought it up. its a thing you do. mention an outrageous notion to prove that any nefarious activity could be occurring . and anyone suggesting such is a nut job . you are an odd man

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Whatta crazy thing to think.

      Delete
    2. I hope you realize, 6:08 Anonymous, that the only reason we're reading your comment is probably that our EGD host decided it would be illuminating for the readers to see a textbook example of "the pot calling the kettle black."

      It's a shame you wasted those 4 capital letters on the last word in a sentence; capital letters would have come in handy at the beginning of a half-dozen of the other sentences!

      Delete
    3. I’ll venture a guess that Anonymous 6:08 is the same person whose capitalisation issues I pointed out yesterday. I don’t necessarily even disagree with your point, but when you can’t spell or punctuate properly, you lose me.

      Btw, this is why most people lose me, subliteracy, apparently, being our cultural modus operandi.

      Delete
    4. 6:08. Are you saying that NS is a nutjob? If you need to see such a person, peek into a mirror!

      Delete
    5. Actually, it was early, and I didn't consider 6:08 too hard before posting. "Odd man" is sorta sweet, actually. I've been called worse.

      Delete
    6. Hey Joe, I'm really sorry I've explained this before. I have some issues with my fingers not working real well and I mostly just talk to the phone. I understand the rules of capitalization in grammar but my computer doesn't my phone's a little better about it. I'm sorry that it hurts you so.
      I generally just hope that people understand what I'm saying. I know it's difficult but I live to have people lord it over me. The ultra literate are my heroes that's why I keep coming back. It works. It works

      Delete
    7. No anonymous 3:07 Neil is not a nut job. At least I don't think so. I don't know the man.

      He thinks people that believe conspiracy theories are nut jobs.

      I'm not so certain. Haven't met them either.

      What with Tuskegee, gulf of tonkin, weapons of mass distraction, various covert operations and other secret government activities MLK, Iran contra, ,it's understandable people might think you can't always believe everything the government doesn't tell you.

      Just saying
      Frank in Pocket Town

      Delete
    8. Frank, Neil is a known quantity. He has shown up to work in a real office, been vetted by a reputable organization and build a solid reputation. The entity known today as 6:08 has no proof of existence as a human being. I doubt it could present itself at any location, unless the person who created the bot masquerading as 6:08 showed its face.

      Delete
    9. "Frank in Pocket Town," eh?

      Is Pocket Town even big enough to have two Franks commenting on EGD? Does this mean that Mr. 6:08 has previously been known here as FME, then Franco? If so, I wouldn't have been quite so mean yesterday...

      Delete
    10. Try to follow along JP. I'm anonymous at 6:08 . I hope that clears this up

      Frank in pocket Town

      Delete
    11. I don't understand the whole kerfuffle about anonymous and whatever other handles people use to comment.

      Unless you've been to a book signing or reading or attended one of Neil's events at the Opera or something. None of us know who each other are and saying who we are has very little meaning. But yes, I post with various different handles depending on my mood.
      I don't mind when people disagree with me. I don't mind when they're mean to me. I honestly try to keep things civil but sometimes they get misconstrued. I really like reading Neil's stuff and the comments by most of the commenters you know. I have no idea who they are. They're all anonymous. As far as I know though, it does seem like Janet Dahl would be Steve's wife and I don't know them. And Tony Fitzpatrick could be Tony Fitzpatrick. Hard to say but him I know.

      I had hoped Neil would have a 10th anniversary party, a picnic or something and we could all get together though just because you comment on a Chicago writer you could live anywhere. We all know grizz lives in Cleveland. Yes I am
      Frank in Pocket Town

      Delete
    12. Well, thanks for replying FME / Franco / Frank. Of course, I disagree. I know more about Grizz (and you, for that matter) just from reading what you've posted on EGD than I know about most of my neighbors. Not that it's all that significant, but a commenter having a track record of many previous comments, whatever name or pseudonym one uses, is helpful when deciding how seriously to take an individual comment.

      To wit: I thought yesterday's 6:08 comment was left by a random, drive-by troll. I didn't realize it was from a SPECIFIC, well-known troll! (Uh, that's a joke -- I don't think you're a troll.)

      I know what you think about a variety of things, and that you're a reasonable guy, so the comment reads differently than if it was written by an anti-science, right-wing crank, as I might have presumed.

      Plus, some of us find so many Anonymous comments annoying. If somebody is bothering to comment, it's not that much trouble to put *anything* besides Anonymous above your comment. Today, it seems like a half-dozen comments were left at about 11:45 by the same person. It would have been nice to know. Does that matter? Of course not, none of this matters! : )

      Delete
  2. I happened to be on a golf course when the alert sounded. I read it and my playing partner commented that it was the test alert that he had heard would be getting sent out. I wasn't aware that it was coming so I figured it was a weather alert. To me it brought to mind the sirens that at one time would sound at (if memory serves) 10:30 on Tuesdays in years gone by. As a kid (I'm 71 now) I didn't think the weekly sirens were anything special but later I guess I realized that they were connected to nuclear threats, probably tying that to the times that we had drills in grade school where we would get under the desks or go into the hallway, kneel down and cover our heads in case "the bomb" was dropped. Still later, when I found out how atom bombs worked I laughed at the silliness of the alarm and the drills knowing what would really happen in the event of nuclear war. So, that's what yesterday's alarm brough to mind for me, but I'm happy to know that there's a system in place to warn us of things like tornados and hurricanes. I also appreciate the technology and the people who manage and implement it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. The sirens are still tested on Tuesday mornings. Alas, given the increased number of potentially dangerous weather events due to climate change, I've heard them at other times more in the last few years than I ever had before.

      Delete
    2. Living in Will county now, I guess I don't hear the city sirens...

      Delete
    3. Of the testing-the-weather-alert kind, nor the fire trucks, ambulances, cop cars... You can probably sleep with the windows open! : )

      Delete
    4. 10:00 AM Tuesdays Golf and Algonquin, earsplitting that can be experienced beyond Woodfield Mall. I did not receive the alert on Wednesday. My sister and I are on the same bill, she was alerted, I was ignored, go figure.

      Delete
  3. At 1:18 yesterday my phone was in my purse, where it usually resides. I had read about the alert but didn't hear a buzz or a ring. I did see the alert later, read it, and deleted.

    BTW Neil, check the difference between "effects" and "affects". I know it's nitpicky and I'll probably be called grammar police, still it was noticeable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right you are. Not nitpicky at all.. Fixed now. Thanks.

      Delete
  4. I kept my phone off, but a friend's went off at 1:19. Jimmy Kimmel said all the phones around him also went off a minute early.
    As to your photo with the tornado warning in it, several years ago there was a tornado warning for Orland Park, so some "genius" at Chicago's OEMC decided to set off every single siren in the city, even all the way up north in Rogers Park, thus scaring the hell out of people never in danger.
    And I agree, just what good are the sirens for a nuclear attack, since it only takes under 20 minutes for a ballistic missile to cross the world!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This theory about the nanoparticles helps explain all the "I'm not a Zombie" jokes I saw on social last night. I knew I missed something -- although not enough to google it. So thanks for your reporting. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I’m my suburban Chicago town that siren still goes off every Tuesday at 10am

    ReplyDelete
  7. In addition to my own phone going off, I also heard the radio version of the emergency alert. (It was funny to hear someone's phone going off in the studio background as they announced the upcoming radio test.)

    It struck me that the spoken message portion about how this was just a test was the worst, most static-filled, borderline-unintelligible spoken message that I had heard in a long time. It sounded like they recorded it off a phone call circa 1966.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Over-the-air television is required, I think, to still send out those "This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System" messages with the same grating alert sound to get the viewer's attention and the same static-filled voice message announcing that it's a test. Of course, they never seem to happen during a commercial, conveniently, but always during the program being watched so the viewer ends up missing some program content.

      Delete
  8. This old geezer is assuming that landlines were unaffected, but I took our phone off the hook anyway, so that the phone...and the six extensions in this two-bedroom bungalow...would not make any noise. Okay, you can stop laughing now. My wife saw the message on her screen and deleted it.

    IPAWS sounds like some kind of feline rescue outfit that feeds, traps, fixes, and fosters--Individuals Protecting Animals Without Sustenance...or maybe something similar.

    Unfortunately, Northeast Ahia still uses that electronic shriek from hell...when there's a weather warning...or when AT &T tests their cable equipment, usually weekly. The ones that piss me off the most are the ones that let everyone in the state know that some crazed, desperate, and armed Jethro down in West Virginny has become enraged over another custody dispute. So they've snatched their hatchling from the estranged and sobbing wife, tossed the kid into a battered pickup, grabbed their shootin' iron, and are heading north. To Cleveland. Or not.

    They might be six counties away, and we still have to hear all about it. Loudly and incessantly. Are those annoyances called Amber Alerts? Just STFU already...and tell someone who cares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what's worse?
      You're watching a late night talk show & around midnight they do that Emergency Alert idiocy test, which always kills off the audio of whoever is on the talk show. It never happens during an ad & even closed captioning doesn't work!

      Delete
    2. While I, too, despise those incessant Amber Alerts, there was an incident in Wisconsin, maybe 15 years ago, where a guy kidnapped his ex-wife from her home, drove her across the Wisconsin-Illinois border, and dumped her bound body into a big industrial barrel he kept in a storage locker. Thanks to the Amber Alert, which included his license plate number, the police were able to apprehend him and find the wife, thankfully still alive, based on 911 calls that reported where his car had been seen. Even though it may be annoying to those of us who are not involved in the abduction, they are very helpful, imo. They also have "Gray Alerts" which are for missing senior citizens (not senior HS students). Since I am now a senior citizen I am grateful to know that if I ever develop dementia and someone notices that I wandered away from my home and reports me as being missing, others may hear about my disappearance and pay attention to a wandering old & demented senior thinking she's out for a stroll.

      Delete
  9. The signal is not meant for earthlings.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It seems the Emergency Alerts weren't activated, either locally, regionally or nationwide during 9/11. Perhaps the days of these kinds of warnings have passed. How many thought it was probably some type of spam?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chicago still tests the sirens at 10 a.m. on the first Tuesday of every month. I hear it!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Scared the hell out of me and I was duly informed well in advance by the Sun-Times that it was coming.

    john

    ReplyDelete
  13. Agree with Frank in PocketTown.

    Politics is a business of mendacity. NO ONE wants to hear what really has to be done, so pols of all stripe couch their language (and often hide deeds) with rivers of rhetorical effluent.

    And tho I'm not worried on a conspiracy level about this alert system (and c'mon, who in the midwest WOULDN'T want to know that Kim Jong In just nuked Dan Diego?), it certainly could be used to cause a national panic if it fell into the wrong small hands...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.