Friday, July 10, 2015
Don't blame the Chinese, yet
We teach kids the wrong stuff.
Yes, multiplication is important. And you don’t want youngsters looking at a dollar bill and wondering, “Who’s the dude in the wig?”
But we load students with too many dates, too many facts, too much Treaty of Ghent and not enough organizing concepts.
Knowing a fact — the Civil War ended in 1865 — can be helpful in constructing an accurate view of the world. But knowing a concept helps you mold the countless facts encountered through life into meaning.
If I had the chance to design a class for high school students, I would teach “Pattern Recognition.” Patterns explain so much: Why you wake up at night, startled, thinking the shirt you draped over a chair is an intruder. Why so many otherwise sane people believe the 9/11 attacks were the result of a conspiracy other than the actual conspiracy. Or why on Wednesday, when I saw that, in addition to United Airlines suspending its entire operations due to a computer malfunction, the New York Stock Exchange had also ceased trading, I tweeted two words: “The Chinese . . .”
We connect dots, facts, and form patterns, some accurate, some illusional. United Airlines freezes up, Wall Street goes down, the Wall Street Journal home page too — obviously an attack — and China, causing computer trouble lately, the obvious culprit. The difference is, when officials announced that it wasn’t an attack, just coincidence, I accepted that. (Although, wouldn’t that be just what they would say, to avoid panic?)
See, that’s what people do. They take a couple of data points and spin a story around it. That’s how the little pinpricks of light randomly jumbled in the sky became Orion the Hunter, Gemini the Twins, Queen Cassiopeia and such. Then we stick with that story, ludicrous though it be. Think of those constellations. All our technology, all the complicated history of the world, all the stuff we have to know now that shepherds 2,000 years ago didn’t have to know.
So why does society still teach us the “W” in the sky is Cassiopeia — and I never bothered to find this out before — a Greek queen famous for her beauty? Whose vanity drew the wrath of the gods, which is why she is in that chair, the Earth’s rotation turning her upside down, punishing her.
Heck, why not? The stars are always above — no glitches there — and separating them into little packages and giving those clusters personalities, well, maybe it makes the night less scary. We look up and see the Big Dipper, we recognize a pattern, like a friend’s face in a crowd. So not only do patterns alarm — the bear that isn’t there, the Chinese attack that wasn’t, apparently. But they also comfort.
Technical disruption, temporarily and on a small scale, can be comforting too. Or at least a chance for a pause from routine. I like when the power goes out. We light a few candles and sit there, a routine evening turned into flickering drama. I’m sure after two days it would get old, but my power was never out for two days. Lucky me.
Even computer crashes, annoying as they are, are also a reminder that this isn’t magic. It’s human agency. Robots won’t take us over; we’ll take ourselves over. The networks are all dependent on overworked, overheating server farms in places like Prineville, Oregon, and Weehawken, New Jersey, and right here in Chicago, where Microsoft has thousands of servers. Facebook has been wheezing lately, its data banks no doubt groaning under billions of users who all want to post video of their 4-year-old playing a bee in the school pageant. Facebook constantly crashes — “Aw, Snap!” Chrome’s error screen says — which was cute the first 20 times I saw it.
I take Facebook’s sputtering as a karmic reminder that Facebook has peaked, and the less time I spend on it the better. We have to remember that all this online stuff is still relatively new and people are still figuring out how much of our lives to devote to it. I’m not suggesting the novelty might wear off. We won’t go back to pasting photos in scrapbooks or recording stock sales in ledger books. But we might decide to focus a tad more on the living world and a tad less on the Internet. It is possible. Isn’t it?
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I cannot argue Neil, that more real-world is better for us than online-world. But I do enjoy online-world quite a bit. "China" was my first thought when the UAL, NYSE and WSJ downtime "coincidence" occurred. I think there was something more to it than those in-the-know will ever reveal, and that those of us not in-the-know will ever know.ReplyDelete
The Chinese stock market seems to be tanking too -- whom do they blame?ReplyDelete
Us, no doubt.Delete
Agree about how History should be taught, etc. Whether it was high school level or later college level, I stayed away from date memorization and went with cause and effect, the why and how. This is part of Bloom's taxonomy on critical thinking.ReplyDelete
As for the airline crash, maybe American airlines has a better system. It seems United has more problems with that, as reported by the paper yesterday.
On the Facebook matter, the 20 somethings or young barely bother with it, I hear tell. Snapchat, Tumblr and Instagram is more in use by that demographic. Or if it is used, it's considered passe'.
Having a young adult, offspring keeps one clued in on these things.Delete
Pattern recognition is important to understand, and should be taught within the framework of critical thinking. If one has extreme views, you become very susceptible to confirmation bias. One possible way to minimize the risk, is to teach the ability to understand multiple points of view, by using a broad curriculum. Banning or ignoring other points of view, when teaching, will often lead to conflicts in society that are difficult to resolve.ReplyDelete
Well said, Bernie.ReplyDelete
Mr. S., was that photo taken fairly recently at a local school?ReplyDelete
A few years back. Why?Delete
The kid up front on the left looks like one of yours. I think that's why.Delete
He does, a bit yes. But no, just a class I was talking to about journalism. I snapped the shot waiting to be introduced, realizing that nobody was looking at me at all. And yes, I did ponder whether it was intrusive to post the picture but a) given that nobody is identified and b) given that they're all just sitting there, not doing anything noteworthy or embarrassingI figured it was okay.Delete
I hope they were interested and receptive.Delete
Yes, the online world has it's advantages too.ReplyDelete
"Robots won’t take us over;" Don't listen to mean Neil, Robbie - we still love you!!!ReplyDelete
I'd like to see that class called Pattern Recognition and Risk Analysis. While our brains are pretty good at forming quick judgments about potential threats, they're not as good at assessing the scale of said threats. Most of us should be a lot more concerned about heart disease than ISIS, to give one example.ReplyDelete
We had a power outage last evening, and I didn't have quite the same equanimity about it as you. Possibly because I hadn't made dinner yet.
You never saw the classic Clash of the Titans? It explains about the constellations at the end. Well worth to watch: Lawrence Olivier, Maggie Smith, and Cassiopeia is Sian Phillips(who was superb in I,Claudius). The best is Ray Harryhausen's stop-motion effects. They should never have remade it.ReplyDelete
Regarding the United system failing: Given their usual level of service, how could anyone tell?ReplyDelete
good one, ScribeReplyDelete
Nikki, I loved the I, Claudius presentation on PBS years back. Derreck Jacoby was made for the part.Delete
I don't think Derek Jacobi has ever done a bad role. Even his voice work is excellent.Delete
I always thought that there had been more stars visible in Greek times and the rest of Cassiopeia had since dimmed or been obscured by light pollution, leaving only that bodacious rack.ReplyDelete
I always thought that there had been more stars visible in Greek times and the rest of Cassiopeia had dimmed or been obscured by light pollution, leaving only that bodacious rack.ReplyDelete