Tuesday, September 26, 2023

Flashback 2006: "We didn't know what it meant."

Captured Syrian tanks

     Usually, I have a nose for anniversaries. I can see them coming. Not this time; I didn't realize that Monday was the 50th anniversary of the 1973 Yom Kippur War until the rabbi leading the service mentioned it at the start of his sermon. Though I suppose it's fitting that the anniversary snuck up on me. It reminded me of the moment captured at beginning of this column, from 17 years ago. Back then, the column ran a full page, and I've left in the subheads, and the rest, including the lame joke at the end, in case you feel like reading it.

OPENING SHOT

     I once found myself on the Golan Heights, chatting with an Israeli general. We stared down at the sweeping vista; you could see for miles, into Lebanon and Syria.
     He was a veteran of the 1973 war, when the Syrians recaptured the heights, briefly, and I had a question that — though impolitic — I just had to ask:
     How'd they ever sneak up on you? How could the Syrian tanks possibly have stormed the heights and taken you guys by surprise?
     He paused, thinking — this was obviously a difficult question — then gave me an honest answer, one that has stuck in my mind ever since.
     "We saw them coming," he said. "But we didn't understand what that meant."

THE MIND HAS TO ADJUST

     I didn't go into the office Monday, deciding instead to camp out in front of my computer and watch CNN's coverage of the Sept. 11 attacks, rebroadcast online as if in real-time.
     I didn't watch the day the attacks happened — busy — and was interested in seeing how the coverage transpired.
     What impressed me was how difficult it was for the anchors to process what was happening in front of them. Even though the second plane struck on live television — as some witness to the first attack prattled on, unaware — it was unnoticed and unremarked upon for a long time. At first they thought it might be a secondary explosion, related to the first plane. Even after they realized a second plane had hit, the CNN announcer clung to the notion that some kind of navigational beacon error might be sending airplanes into the World Trade Center.
     The word "terrorism" was never used, nor the possibility raised, until an unnamed government official announced that this was indeed an attack.
     I don't think CNN did a bad job, under the circumstances. Only it does remind us — as we cope with this uncertain future — how very human it is to cling to normalcy, to ignore what is going on under your nose if it deviates too much from the standard script. If Osama bin Laden himself, in turban and flowing robes, got aboard the 8:16 Metra Milwaukee North Line train this morning, and sat quietly holding a black spherical cartoon bomb on his lap, my guess is that most people on the train wouldn't give him a second glance, not until he drew out his lighter and lit the fuse, and only then because smoking isn't allowed on the train.

EMPTY PROMISES

     President Bush's first remarks on that day five years ago — Florida schoolchildren standing incongruously behind him, as if he were still going to talk about education — were to pledge the full support and power of the federal government to aid the disaster in New York.
     He needs to keep that pledge. As you probably have heard, as many as 70 percent of the firefighters, police officers, construction workers and ordinary citizens who rushed to the World Trade Center site to help, and who aided in clearing the scene, are now suffering from lung disease due to inhaling all that dust. Just like Americans as a whole, 40 percent of them do not have health insurance.
     Are they to be punished for helping? To suffer for their heroism, unaided by government? I watched Bush's speech Monday night, and was jarred to see him praise the dead and ignore the living. This is unacceptable, and the president should say nothing until he commits the nation to stand by its bravest citizens. He needs to make good on his past words before uttering any more.

WE'RE MORE POPULAR DEAD

     The Sept. 11 anniversary brought a blizzard of commentary, much of it daft. The most ridiculous, to me, was the statement, repeated again and again, that the United States enjoyed a groundswell of international sympathy immediately after 9/11, support we squandered by acting the way we did.
     Well, yeah. But what of it? They always love you when you die. Take it from a Jew — the world likes nothing better than to sit back and cluck sympathetically at your destruction.
     Act, however, in any kind of decisive fashion, protect yourself, and disapproval is swift. Israel was the spunky underdog when the Arab nations had its neck on the block and were sharpening their scimitars. Now that Israel has a bit of might, the world wails that it's a bully and an aggressor.
     President Bush had to do something after 9/11, and what he did — go after bin Laden and his supporters, the Taliban in Afghanistan, made perfect sense. The Iraqi war was more a stretch, but even then, WMD or no, there was a logic: One of the lessons of 9/11 was not to turn a blind eye to threats.
      It is fooling ourselves to pretend that, if only we had left Iraq alone, then the world would be our buddy. It wasn't before, and the flash of pity at 9/11 was certain to pass no matter what we did.

I THINK SHE LASTED A YEAR. . .

     You don't remember Lynda Gorov. But I do. She was going to be a big-deal Chicago columnist. In the hoopla welcoming her, which included billboards, she told Michael Miner that she was preparing for her newspapering fame by lying on a beach in Mexico, reading a Mike Royko anthology. The gods stirred.
     It has been nearly 20 years, but I can still feel the headshaking shiver of utter, slack-jawed, visceral disgust that rattled across me.
     Flash to today. Michael McCarthy, a Second City alum, is telling the Tribune all about his new radio show debuting next week on Q101. It's going to be Chicagoriffic!
     "At the end I do a commentary," he said. "I used Mike Royko as my model. I'm rereading his columns."
     Good idea. Hope it works. Though isn't that like rubbing a $20 bill against your wallet, trying to breed money? Royko doesn't rub off and only fools try. Whenever a reader writes in to say that I'm no Royko, I thank him, sincerely, because not being Royko is one of my major life goals.
     I particularly wouldn't use Royko as an example were I in broadcasting, given how wooden he was when he did political commentary on TV.
     But maybe you'll do better, Michael McCarthy, in however many months you've got before Q101 gives you the flush. Welcome to Chicago, pal, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. (Editor's note: McCarthy lasted a little more than a year at Q101 and died in 2020, age 61).

TODAY'S CHUCKLE

     This one is not my fault. It is the fault of Robin Reizner, of Vernon Hills, who in turn blames a client:
     What is Irish and stays out all night?
     Patio Furniture


     A lucrative client, I assume.
                                        —Originally published in the Sun-Times, Sept. 13, 2006

24 comments:

  1. The date of Yom Kippur, which follows the Jewish lunar calendar, fell on the Jewish Sabbath that year. The war, which resulted in an Israeli military victory, began on Saturday, October 6, and lasted for 19 days, ending with a cease-fire on October 25. And when that joke is witten out, the punchline works better if it reads as: "Paddy O' Furniture."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your lifetime of punning has been put to good use here, Grizz. : ) The punchline works MUCH better for me, as I was scratching my head about what that joke was supposed to mean until I read your comment. Thanks!

      Delete
    2. No problem. It's what I do. Irish I could be of more help. Just say the word [smirk]. After my excellent adventures, during my visit last month, I'm now finding that Amish Chicago a lot more than I have in a long time.

      Delete
  2. I never watch the morning news shows, I find them boring, but that day I came downstairs & turned on the computer & there was a small story that a plane had hit the WTC in NYC. Expecting that it was a small private plane I turned the TV & saw the second plane hit the other building.
    But I've learned that TV news people don't seem to know much outside of a small fabric of their lives.
    I remember watching the 1989 World Series when the Loma Prieta earthquake hit San Francisco & Oakland. The TV crews kept their focus on that short section of the Bay Bridge that had broken free from the main span east of Treasure island, but for some reason they couldn't figure out what I immediately saw was the collapse of the double deck freeway in Oakland. They kept showing a video of that collapsed freeway from a helicopter camera, but never could figure it out. Because they never identified the location, I thought it was the Embarcadero Freeway, which everyone in SF hated, because it blocked the view of the Ferry Building. What's interesting is the quake forced them to demolish the double deck Embarcadero Freeway, because the engineers determined it wasn't safe to survive another quake.
    As for the aftermath of September 11, Junior Bush gave up on getting Bin Laden, so Obama ordered the necessary deed be done. Bush, who at his best is a moron, ignored the President's Daily Brief given to him that stated Bin Laden was going to attack the US again. But then again then still makes him way smarter than T****, who is a useless, worthless, pile of shit, fucking moron!
    As for the Israeli general who said they saw them coming, don't forget, the radar operators on Oahu also saw the Japanese planes coming but thought they were a returning flight of US planes flying in from the North of the island. It wasn't until the bombings starting they knew otherwise. Directing his ships & planes to attack from the north was Yamamoto's brilliance, but he was never able to convince his foolish superior's of the massive superiority of American industry, which he saw by train travel in the 1920s, as a lieutenant serving as Japan's naval attache in DC. He saw that outside of Pittsburgh, lining the Monongahela River was 50 miles of steel mills & from the South Side of Chicago into Indiana around the South end of Lake Michigan were another 40 miles of steel mills. He told them he would win for six months & then it was over & done for Japan. He was only a month off on that, as the Battle of Midway was seven months after Pearl Harbor & Japan never managed to do much after that except lose battles & men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yamamoto is alleged to have also said: "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." Whether he said it or not, that's exactly what happened. Pearl Harbor united a divided America in 1941, just as 9/11 did in 2001...at least until Christmastime, anyway.

      Delete
  3. Ahh, the old "Chamberlain didn't see it coming" trope. For every threat we didn't anticipate and got caught, we went off half-cocked for no reason. The Maine? No Spanish bomb. Gulf of Tonkin? Overanxious Americans firing on nothing. Domino theory? Not so much. We were lied to again about the threat of WMD and spent $3 trillion and accomplished what? Got rid of one dictator while we suck up to a dictator whose countrymen were in fact responsible for 9/11. Threat assessment going awry is one thing. Lying about the threat to accomplish a political or military goal is a whole 'nother ballgame.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I grew up reading Royko, who was almost exactly my father's age. At his best, he could be incisive, or very funny, or very moving. Like a lot of working-class whites of his generation, FDR-Kennedy Democrats, he was heading steadily right when he died, an old man who went to college on gov't programs and spent his golden years bitching about hippies (Bill Clinton!) and taxes. Had he lived long enough, he'd almost certainly have voted for Trump
    Over the years, I heard a lot of friend-of-friends type stories about personal encounters with him. He never came off well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never had a good encounter with him. Now, every so often, a reader writes to me and tells me I'm no Royko. And I thank them, saying that given how Royko was a mean drunk whose kid robbed a bank, not being Royko is something of a life goal of mine.

      Delete
    2. there was that event at the Old Town tavern a few weeks ago re-creating Royko's beer taste test put on by some friends.

      I genuinely like Royko's early writing, but the idea of the event depressed me. Royko's relationship to liquor seemed like one of his worst traits, and one that made his other bad ones stronger. He seems like the sort of man whom I glad I never met.

      Delete
    3. During my brief cup of coffee a the Sun-Times (1976-78), I only conversed with him once...if you count grunting at each other in the men's room at the Billy Goat. He would literally hold court in the newsroom. He'd sit on a desk while his legion of sycophants surrounded him...and hung on his every word. I was not among them. Seeing it disgusted me.

      I was working in the wire room when the City News Bureau broke the story of his late-night arrest, after a brawl in a Lincoln Ave. bar. Somebody at the paper had to bail him out. And there was also the day he physically challenged a Tribune pressman who sat on "Mike's Stool" at the Billy Goat, and got decked. Didn't see the clocking, but I heard a lot about it. Wish I'd been there, an eyewitness to Chicago journalism history.

      Delete
    4. That might have been in 1977, when he broke a ketchup bottle and threatened Suzan Quinlan for not knowing who he was. I have his letter of apology to her framed next to my desk, though I'm going to give it back to her. She thought I might be interested in writing about the episode, but I don't think it merits attention.

      Delete
    5. Bingo, Mr. S. The Ketchup Incident. Late winter or early spring of '77. Can't recall what month. Happened in the notorious 2200 block of N. Lincoln Ave. Which was where I did my carousing in those days, before Wrigleyville was Wrigleyville.

      Delete
    6. We were sitting at the bar in Ricardo’s years ago and the friendly, gabby Studs came in and sat next to us. He was waiting for Royko who came in and sat at a table in the corner. Studs left to join him and suggested we stop by their table after we finished eating waiting he could introduce us to Royko. Another news guy at the bar, I think it was John McHugh, leaned over and said “don’t even think about going over there, he’ll bite your heads off.” We heeded his advice.

      Delete
    7. I have the court records, clips, etc. I just don't see the value in resuscitating it. The most interesting aspect is, when Royko sent her the letter, he said she should hold onto it, and it should be valuable someday. I approached a couple Chicago auction houses, on her behalf, and neither was interested in selling the letter. It's basically worthless, because there's no market.

      Delete
    8. No market for "Roykoiana" you mean (does that word even exist? I just made it up, I think)..because there's no such animal. I still have a very old pair of those white "Cub socks" (Cub Sox? Cub White Sox?)...with a Cub logo and his signature on them, but that isn't genuine. His scrawl was printed right on the socks. I framed them anyway.

      Delete
  5. I actually remember Lynda Gorov and the hype thereof. She became the Rula Lenska of Chicago journalism -- who the hell IS this chick? (Old farts like me will get that reference; others can look it up if they care to.) The endless hype, in fact, is the only thing I remember about her. I had a Trib subscription at the time, but if you put a gun to my head now, I could not remember a single thing she wrote.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tried to talk to her once. We were sitting outside on the plaza east of 401 N. Wabash. I said something along the lines that we both sank or swam depending on the quality of what we wrote, and she took exception to this, saying, in essence, she could walk across the street to Tribune any time she wanted. She must have taken the long way...

      Delete
    2. Tried to look her up. Apparently, she's still around, and has been a freelancer in SoCal for a while...don't know how long. Links to her name are few. Her LinkedIn profile only goes back to the mid-2000s, but starts with: "Experienced editor, writer, journalist, content strategist, 551 followers 500+ connections." My, my.

      I was still living in Chicago during her brief tenure there, which apparently lasted about as long as a lightning bolt, accompanied by the crash of thunder that was all hype. Don't remember her at all, nor anything she may have written. Seems incredibly full of herself. I avoid witches like that. I 've known a number of them.

      Delete
    3. Rula Lenska, now there's a name I haven't heard of in ages. I still remember her in those TV ads where she was referred to as a famous actress, except absolutely no one had ever heard of her!

      Delete
  6. This swell column is overflowing with things one could comment on.

    "...how very human it is to cling to normalcy, to ignore what is going on under your nose if it deviates too much from the standard script." As with so many observations, it's hard to read that today and not apply it to the ascendance, reign, and continued relevance of the Biggest Loser. Even having witnessed this ongoing national nightmare, I still find it hard to believe that so many refuse to acknowledge what a charlatan he is. How dangerous a predicament the country is in.

    I also want to give a thumbs-up to the painting atop the blog, "Transport of Colonial Soldiers." I assume you saw it on your recent trip, Neil, since the artist was from the Netherlands. There's something crisp and well-defined about it that I really like, especially with the muted colors. Anyway, it is shown off to fine effect occupying the whole screen. Cool!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, in the Rijksmuseum. I thought it showed an aspect of war too easily overlooked.

      Delete
  7. On 9-11 I was working in my shop manufacturing furniture listening to cassette tapes. It wasn't until after lunch that I made a phone call on the land line , answering machine blinking with messages.

    Both buildings had collapsed before I heard anything about it.

    I felt prompted to watch you tube on this years anniversary. Watched some real time news coverage and a documentary made by to Frenchmen who'd been following cadet firemen for weeks before it happened. Capturing incredible scenes inside tower 2.

    Then a documentary detailing the construction techniques used to erect the towers explaining why they fell after being struck. Kept me up til 2 in the morning. Overwhelmed with sadness . Again

    ReplyDelete
  8. Had to come back here and re-read this today.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Same here. Eleven days later, after a re-run of the 2006 Mr. S. column that touched on the 1973 war, the Israelis, 9/11...the poop hits the propeller. Or, rather, more like a whole row of porta-potties being pulverized in a whole bomber wing's worth of propellers. Two, three, a dozen Pearl Harbors. Reading this again gave me the willies.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are vetted and posted at the discretion of the proprietor.