Thursday, January 16, 2020

The mayor puts her foot down


     Watched the presidential debate Tuesday night. Not much to add to the general roar. The whole thing seems beside-the-point right now. One of these candidates will have to defeat Donald Trump. Or lose to him.
      Or Michael Bloomberg will swoop in and do the job. Though that seems improbable, no matter how many commercials he runs.  Besides, is another self-absorbed billionaire really the answer to whatever our country's real problem is?
     The next day, discussing the outcome with my younger son, he mentioned that South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg is at a disadvantage compared to Joe Biden, since black Americans won't support him, because he's gay, and African-Americans have a particular animus toward gays.
     According to common wisdom. The idea is that, being devout church going folk, they hold the prejudices of the Christian faith a little tighter than most.
     The common wisdom. But is it actually true? I went looking for numbers. A Pew Research Center poll last year found that while 62 percent of white American adults support same-sex marriage, only 51 percent of black American adults do.
     A gap, though not a huge gap. Maybe the effect is magnified because it is more surprising to see blacks being homophobic—just as it is surprising to see them being anti-Semitic—because the of the charmed notion that, having been subject to such prolonged and systemic bigotry themselves, blacks might be more reluctant to inflict baseless hatred upon others.
     Pretty to think so. I don't see much evidence of that being true for any minority group. Racism is a kind of false power, and sometimes disadvantaged groups are even more quick to resort to it, having little else to boost themselves than to jeer at someone they can consider lower. Jews certainly have suffered tremendously at the hands of history, and while Jews, as a group, have certainly worked toward aiding the struggles of other minorities, they also, as individuals, are perfectly capable of expressing the vilest prejudices.
     There was an example of black anti-gay bias on display this week in the Chicago City Council. Mayor Lightfoot sponsored a resolution to look into whether LGBTQ businesses are discriminated against when doing business with the city. During committee debate Tuesday, several black aldermen took turns looking askance at it. Ald. Walter Burnett Jr., questioned whether white gay men can be considered victims of prejudice at all. "I don't think they're discriminated against," he said, incredibly invoking “I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry,” an Adam Sandler yuck-fest where two straight firemen pretend to be gay to gain benefits. He wondered: how can you even tell whether a person is gay or not? What if people are making it up?
     On Wednesday, at the general meeting, Mayor Lori Lightfoot stood up and was having none of it.
     "I don't normally speak during City Council debates," Lightfoot began, in an angry rebuttal. “As a leader, as a black gay woman proud on all fronts, I have to say I’m disturbed by the nature of the committee discussion and the nature of the discussion here today...I will be silent no more on any issue when people say and do things that are offensive and racist, I feel I have an obligation to speak and so I am.""
     I won't go into her whole remarks. They're brief; you can watch them here. But I have to say, I continue to be impressed with Lightfoot. Yes, she is only standing up for her own, and that is not exactly a profile in courage. It is the least anyone can do. Still, she is without a doubt standing up. Often, when a person from a minority group comes to power, they promptly ignore that group, figuring their support is secure. Barack Obama was an example of that—not exactly going out on a limb to help black Americans. But Lightfoot doesn't seem as if she's going to fall into that rut. Good for her.

6 comments:

  1. Sadly, some of the most prejudiced people I grew up with were from my own tribe. Jews have suffered terribly for many centuries, and have greatly aided the causes of blacks and other minorities, but some are unapologetic bigots. My father's older brother had no qualms about being a South Side slumlord who hid his real estate transactions by putting them in his wife's name, and while the n-word was strictly taboo from childhhood on, the S-word was not.

    For the uninitiated, the S is for "schvartse"...which means "black" in both Yiddish and German. It is a pejorative nonetheless. In those days, "black" was still a racial slur, and a fighting word. The S-word was (and still is) not quite as nasty as the n-word, but far more derogatory than the term most commonly used in those times--the c-word, which of course stood for "colored." I grew up routinely hearing both of them, and the S-word was freqently used right into my teen years...and beyond...by Jews who knew better and who championed civil rights and other liberal causes. Sadly, I was among them.

    My uncles (and other relatives) didn't think twice about hiring blacks for the most menial jobs, and paid them as little as they could get away with. They were far from the only Jews who exploited other minorities. When you get kicked around a good deal, having someone even lower on the totem pole to kick around makes the pain more bearable.

    As for gays, I've had gay relatives on both sides of my large extended family for several generations, so that's never been much of a problem for anybody. It was never openly discussed. Any mention of homosexuality was usually met with a shrug. Sexuality didn't matter very much...but skintone most certainly did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's the same thing with Greeks and "mavros." If you hear a bunch of old Greeks grumbling about how the mavri ruined the neighborhood, you'll know what they mean.

      Delete
  2. The problem I see with the Mayor standing up for her own kind is the tendency we have to consider efforts at attaining equality as attempts to gain advantage. To me, it's absurd that someone would pretend to be gay. Whether it happens or not, I doubt that it rises to a substantial social problem or would do so should favoring gay businesses provide an incentive. I think Barack Obama was wise to try to avoid the appearance of favoring black Americans. Unfortunately, it didn't work. So far, LIghtfoot has shown a lot of courage and political ability. It doesn't seem likely that she will need to make unseemly alliances with the powers that be in order to get things done. I certainly hope she doesn't do so.

    john

    ReplyDelete
  3. While Pete is no longer Mayor of South Bend. According to this article either he didn't know, which is hard to believe or just didn't care. https://tyt.com/stories/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA/5l5tnNOkyTbwbYU3DLDxeL

    ReplyDelete
  4. In "Black Boy," Richard Wright recounts how he and other miserable, ignorant and oppressed children in Jim Crow Mississippi would taunt their few Jewish neighbors, mostly shopkeepers:

    All of us black people who lived in the neighborhood hated Jews, not because they exploited us, but because we had been taught at home and in Sunday school that Jews were "Christ killers."...To hold an attitude of antagonism or distrust toward Jews was bred in us from childhood; it was not merely racial prejudice, it was a part of our cultural heritage.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sad. And it's not just the ignorant and oppressed who have been brainwashed into a completely irrational hatred of Jews. 19th Century American, English and French literature displays stunning examples of mindless prejudice even when the authors disclaimed such. And despite today's ecumenical religious atmosphere, gospel readings continue to state that "the Jews cried out, "Crucify him, crucify him."

    john

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comment, which will be published at the discretion of the proprietor.